DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Deep Beam Designed by Two Models of STM and ACI Traditional

깊은 보의 스트럿-타이 모델과 고전적인 방법의 설계 비교

  • Lymei, Uy (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Konyang University) ;
  • Son, Byung-Jik (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Konyang University)
  • Received : 2013.05.10
  • Accepted : 2013.06.21
  • Published : 2013.06.30

Abstract

Deep beam shall be designed either by taking into account nonlinear distribution of strain or by Appendix A of Strut-and-Tie Models (STM) according to ACI 318(M) from version of 2002. Although STM is accepted as tool in design Discontinuity region (D-region) which mostly exist in Deep beam, Corbels, Dapped ends etc., it has been modified by many researchers. In this study we design deep beam by STMs which use simple truss for load distribution and the model of complex truss for load distribution compare with the ACI traditional which is designed by flexure design method and shear provided by concrete($V_c$) as provided in special provisions section of 11.8 in ACI 318-99 [1]. This study aims to find the different and efficiency of deep beam design based on variation of parameter compiled from many samples selected from ACI traditional and two model of STMs, simple and complex load distribution.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI Committee 318 (1999), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318M-99) and Commentary (318RM-99), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, pp. 163.
  2. ACI Committee 318 (2011), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318M-11) and Commentary (318RM-11), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, pp. 189.
  3. James, K., Wight and James G., MacGregor (2012), "Reinforced Concrete Mechanics and Design," Pearson, Six Edition, pp. 881.
  4. Karl-Heinz Reineck (2002), Examples for the Design of Structural Concrete with Strut-and-Tie Model.