한국항해항만학회지 (Journal of Navigation and Port Research)

  • 제37권3호
  • /
  • Pages.231-237
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1598-5725(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-8470(eISSN)
한국항해항만학회 (Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

안전항해를 위한 인지작업분석 기법 개발과 적용사례

Development of a Cognitive Work Analysis Method for Safe Ship Navigation and a Case Study

  • 홍승권 (한국교통대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Hong, Seung-Kweon (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation)
  • 투고 : 2013.04.03
  • 심사 : 2013.05.02
  • 발행 : 2013.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

항해사들이 선박을 운항하는 과정에서 수행하게 되는 인지작업을 체계적으로 분석한다는 것은, 선교장비들의 개선, 교육훈련 방법의 개발, 잠재적인 인적오류의 추출 등 다양한 안전항해를 위한 방안들을 마련하기 위한 기초 작업이다. 항공기나 원자력발전 시설과 같이 인적오류에 대해 많은 연구가 수행되어온 분야에서는 인지작업을 분석하기 위한 다양한 분석기법들이 개발되었고, 개발된 기법들을 적용해 왔다. 그러나 해양분야에서는 아직까지 인지작업분석에 대한 연구가 미진한 편이다. 본 연구에서는 선박운항과정에서 수행하는 인지작업을 체계적으로 분석할 수 있는 하나의 인지분석방법을 제안하였다. 제안된 분석방법은 선박운항의 특성들을 반영하고, 인지작업에 영향을 미치는 다양한 요인들을 고려할 수 있도록 개발되었다. 한편 사례분석으로서 컨테이너선 충돌사례에서의 인지작업을 제안된 방법으로 분석하였다.

What to analyze cognitive works that are involved in ship navigation is a basic work to make alternatives for maritime safety such as development of bridge equipments, extraction of potential human errors and development of education/ training methods. In the domains in which much research on the human error has been performed such as aviation and nuclear plant, analysis methods for cognitive work analysis have been developed and applied to them. However, the research on the cognitive work analysis is not sufficient in the maritime domain. This paper proposes a method to analyze cognitive work of ship navigation. The method was developed so that some maritime characteristics and a variety of factors influencing cognitive works are reflected on cognitive work analysis processes. On the other hand, an ship collision accident was analyzed by the proposed method as a case study.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bautsch S. H., Narayanan S. & McNeese D. M., (1997). "Development and evaluation of a cognitive model of human-performance in fighter aircraft." In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, Part 3, pp 2109-2133.
  2. Cacciabue P. C., Decortis, F., Drozdowicz B., Masson M., & Nordvik J. O., (1992). "A cognitive simulation model of human decision making and behaviour in accident management of complex plant". IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 22(5) pp. 1058-1074. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.179844
  3. Itoh, K. Yamaguchi1, T. Hansen, J. P. & Nielsen, F. R. (2001), "Risk Analysis of Ship Navigation by Use of Cognitive Simulation" Cognition, Technology & Work, 3, pp. 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011520
  4. Kim G-S et al. (1999), Bridge Resource Management, Marine Edutech.
  5. Kirlik A., Miller R. A., & Jagacinski R. J., (1993). "Supervisory control in a dynamic and uncertain environment: a process model of skilled human- environment interaction." IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 23, pp. 929-952. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.247880
  6. Kirwan B. and Ainsworth, L. K. (1992), A guide to task analysis, Talyor and Francis.
  7. Ko, S-M & Myung, R-H, (2006), "Ecological Interface design for sir traffic control display", Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 25(4), pp 103-113. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2006.25.4.103
  8. Lee, J. D. & Sanquist, T. F. (2000), "Augmenting the operator function model with cognitive operations: assessing the cognitive demands of technological innovation in ship navigation", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 30. No. 3. pp. 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844353
  9. Lee, J. D., McCallum, M. C., Maloney, A. L. & Jamieson, G. A. (1997), Validation and Sensitivity Analysis of a Crew Size Evaluation Method, ADA331589, Battle Seattle Research Center.
  10. Mitchell C. M. & Miller, R. A., (1986), "A descrete control model of operator function: A methodology for information display design," IEEE Transaction on Sys., Man, Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-16, pp. 343-357.
  11. Newell, A & Simon, H. A. (1972), Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  12. Rasmussen, J. (1983), "Skills, rules and knowledge; signals, signs and symbols and other distinctions in human performance models," IEEE Transaction on Sys., Man, Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-13, pp. 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313160
  13. Sanquist, T. F., Lee, J. D. & Rothblum, A. M. (1994), Cognitive analysis of navigation tasks: A tool for training assessment and equipment design, CG-D-19-94, U. S. Coast Guard Research and Development Center.
  14. Schraagen, J. M., Chipman, S. F., & Shute, V. J. (2000) "State-of-the-art review of cognitive task analysis techniques." In J. M Schraagen, S. F. Chipman & V. J. Shute (Eds.), Cognitive Task Analysis (pp. 467-487). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  15. Smidts C., Shen S. H., & Mosleh A., (1997). "The IDA cognitive model for the analysis of nuclear power plant operator response under accident conditions. Part I: problem solving and decision making model." Reliability Engineering and System Safety 55 pp. 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00104-4
  16. Thurman, D. A., Chappell, A. R. & Mitchell, C. M., (1998), "An enhanced architecture for OFMert:A domain-independent system for intent inferencing," IEEE Int. Conf. Sys., Man, Cybernetics.
  17. Vicente, K. J. (1999), Cognitive work analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, New Jersey.

피인용 문헌

  1. Prediction Table for Marine Traffic for Vessel Traffic Service Based on Cognitive Work Analysis vol.13, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2013.13.4.315