Korean Journal of Poultry Science (한국가금학회지)

The Korean Society of Poultry Science (한국가금학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Origins of Soybean Meal on Growth Performance, Nutrient Retention and Excreta Microflora of Broilers

  • Ku, Yun (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Ingale, Santosh Laxman (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin Soo (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Kwang Hyun (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Su Hyup (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Chae, Byung Jo (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2013.05.21
  • Accepted : 2013.06.13
  • Published : 2013.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine the effects of origins of soybean meal (SBM) on growth performance, nutrients and energy retention and fecal microflora in broilers. The SBM originating from Korea, Brazil and India were used. A total of 480 broiler chicks (average initial BW, 41.8 g) were randomly allotted to 6 treatments. Each treatment had 4 replicate pens with 20 chicks per pen. Birds were fed diets containing SBM originated from Korea (domestic SBM), Brazil or India (imported SBM) and the diets were based on the total amino acid (TAA) or true digestible amino acid (TDAA). Experimental diets were fed in two phases, starter (d 0~21) and finisher (d 22~35). The overall weight gain, feed intake and FCR were better (P<0.05) in birds fed Korean SBM. During starter and finisher periods, birds fed diets containing Korean SBM had greater (P<0.05) retention of GE, DM, and CP (P<0.05) as compared with Birds fed diets containing SBM from India. In addition, diets formulated on TDAA basis had grater (P<0.05) CP retention during starter period and DM, GE and CP retention during finisher period. There were no differences (P>0.05) in the excreta microflora and overall feed cost per kg body weight gain in birds fed SBM from different origins; however, diets formulated on TDAA basis had lesser (P<0.05) feed cost per kg body weight gain in birds when compared with diets formulated on TAA basis. These results indicate that Korean SBM has better nutrients digestibility than SMB originated from Brazil and India, which contributes to the improved performance of broilers. In addition, better performance was obtained when diets were formulated on TIDAA basis.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC 2007 Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. AOAC Int., Gaithersburg, MD.
  2. Araba M, Dale N 1990 Evaluation of protein solubility as an indicator of over-processing soybean meal. Poultry Sci 69: 76-83. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690076
  3. ASA 2002 Soy Stats. A Reference Guide to Important Soybean Facts and Figures. American Soybean Association, St. Louis, MO.
  4. Baize JC 1997 Results of USB study on SBM quality released. Soybean Meal Info Source 1:1-4.
  5. Baker KM, Stein HH 2009 Amino acid digestibility and concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy in soybean meal produced from conventional, high-protein, or low-oligosaccharide varieties of soybeans and fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 87:2282-2290. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1414
  6. Choi JY, Shinde PL, Ingale SL, Kim JS, Kim YW, Kim KH, Kwon IK, Chae BJ 2011 Evaluation of multi-microbe probiotics prepared by submerged liquid or solid substrate fermentation and antibiotics in weaning pigs. Livest Sci 138:144-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.12.015
  7. Cromwell GL 2000 Utilization of soy products in swine diets. In Soy in Animal Nutrition. J. K. Drackley, ed Fed. Anim Sci Soc, Savoy, IL, pp. 258-282.
  8. Eggum BO, Beames RM 1983 The nutritive value of seed proteins. In: Seed Proteins, Biochemistry, Genetics, Nutritive value. (Ed. E. Gottschalk and H. P. Muller). pp. 499-531. Martinus Nijhof/Junk, Hague.
  9. Fenton TW, Fenton M 1979 An improved method for chromic oxide determination in feed and feces. Can J Anim Sci 59:631-634. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas79-081
  10. Fuller R 1989 Probiotics in man and animals. J Appl Bacteriol 66:365-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x
  11. Grieshop CM, Fahey GC Jr 2001 Comparison of quality characteristics of soybean meals. J Agric Food Chem 60: 437-442.
  12. Grieshop CM, Kadzere CT, Clapper GM, Flickinger EA, Bauer LL, Frazier RL, Fahey GC 2003 Chemical and nutritional characteristics of United States soybeans and soybean meals. J Agric Food Chem 51:7684-7691. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf034690c
  13. Joo YJ, Kang KR, Nham KT, Kang CW, Jung MS 1994 Evaluation of nutritional quality of soybean oil meals as poultry feed stuffs. Kor J Anim Nutr Feed 18(5):340-345.
  14. Karr-Lilienthal LK, Kadzere CT, Grieshop CM, Fahey GC Jr 2005 Chemical and nutritional properties of soybean carbohydrates as related to nonruminants: A review. Livest Prod Sci 97:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.01.015
  15. Kim IH, Hancock JD, Jones DB, Reddy PG 1999 Extrusion processing of low-inhibitor soybeans improves growth performance of early-weaned pigs. Asian Aust J Anim Sci 12:1251-1257. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1999.1251
  16. Kumar V, Rani A, Goyal L, Dixit AK, Manjaya GJ, Dev J, Swamy M 2010 Sucrose and raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs) in soybean seeds as influenced by genotype and growing location. J Agric Food Chem 58: 5081-5085. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf903141s
  17. Lee H, Garlich JD 1992 Effect of overcooked soybean meal on chicken performance and amino acid availability. Poultry Sci 71:499-508. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0710499
  18. Lee JH, Han IK, Ha JK, Kim JW, Kim IB 1994 The determination of amino acid digestibility of soybean meals in pigs. Kor J Anim Nutr Feed 18:354-362.
  19. Leeson SJ, Attech O, Summers JD 1987 Effects of increasing dietary levels of commercially heated soybeans on performance, nutrient retention and carcass quality of broiler chickens. Can J Anim Sci 67:821-828. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas87-085
  20. Line, EJ, Bailey SJ, Cox NA, Stern NJ, Tompkins T 1998 Effect of yeast-supplemented feed on Salmonella and Campylobacter populations in broilers. Poultry Sci 77: 405-410. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.3.405
  21. Narayan R, Chauhan GS, Verma NS 1988 Changes in the quality of soybean during storage. Part 2 -Effect of soybean storage on the sensory qualities of the products made there from. Food Chem 30(3):181-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(88)90120-3
  22. NRC 1994 Nutrient Requirement of Poultry. 9th Edn. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  23. Park HS, Baik SH 1997 Comparison of two different soybean meal sources for broilers. ASA Feeding Trial Report. ASA, Korea.
  24. Park YH, Kim HK, Kim HS, Lee HS, Shin IS, Whang KY 2002 Effects of three different soybean meal sources on layer and broiler performance. Asian Aust J Anim Sci 15:254-265. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.254
  25. Pascual M, Hugas M, Badiola JI, Monfort JM, Garriga M 1999 Lactobacillus salivarius CTC2197 prevents Salmonella enteritidis colonization in chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4981-4986.
  26. Qin GX, Verstegen MWA, van der Poel AFB 1998 Effect of temperature and time during steam treatment on the protein quality of full-fat soybeans from different origins. J Sci Food Agric 77:393-398. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199807)77:3<393::AID-JSFA59>3.0.CO;2-M
  27. SAS Institute Inc. 1996 SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.11. SAS 412 Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  28. Sauer WC, Ozimek L 1986 Digestibility of amino acids in swine: Results and their practical applications. Livest Prod Sci 15:367-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(86)90076-X
  29. Shim YH, Shinde PL, Choi JY, Kim JS, Seo DK, Pak JI, Chae BJ, Kwon IK 2010 Evaluation of multi-microbial probiotics produced by submerged liquid and solid substrate fermentation methods in broilers. Asian Aust J Anim Sci 23:521-529. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.90446
  30. USDA 2009 Oilseeds: World Markets and Trade. Agric. Marketing Service, USDA, Washington, DC.
  31. van Kempen TATG, van Heugten E, Moeser AJ, Muley NS, Sewalt VJH 2006 Selecting soybean meal characteristics preferred for swine nutrition. J Anim Sci 84:1387-1395. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.8461387x
  32. Ward, NE 1996. Quality Considerations for Soybean Meal. ASA Technical Bulletin. MITA No. 195, 11. ASA, Singapore.