Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bone apposition on implants coated with calcium phosphate by ion beam assisted deposition in oversized drilled sockets: a histologic and histometric analysis in dogs

  • Kim, Min-Soo (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Sungtae (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Seok (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, In-Seop (Institute of Physics and Applied Physics, Atomic-Scale Surface Science Research Center, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2012.11.28
  • Accepted : 2013.01.18
  • Published : 2013.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of calcium phosphate (CaP)-coated implants by ion beam assisted deposition with a lack of primary stability. Methods: A total of 20 CaP-coated implants were bilaterally placed in the mandible of five dogs. In the rotational implant group, the implants were inserted in oversized drilled sockets without mechanical engagement, while the conventional surgical protocol was followed in the control group. Each group was allowed to heal for 4 and 8 weeks. The bone-to-implant contact (BIC, %) was measured by a histometric analysis. Results: All of the implants were well-maintained and healing was uneventful. In the histologic observation, all of the implants tested were successfully osseointegrated with a high level of BIC at both observation intervals. There was no significant difference in BIC among any of the groups. Conclusions: Within the limitation of this study, successful osseointegration of CaP-coated implants could be achieved in unfavorable conditions without primary stability.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsson T, Jansson T, Lekholm U. Osseointegrated dental implants. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:151-74.
  2. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  3. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999;70:1523-39. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.12.1523
  4. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Buser D, Lindhe J. The jumping distance revisited: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:35-42. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140105.x
  5. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Resolution of bone defects of varying dimension and configuration in the marginal portion of the peri-implant bone. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:309-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00502.x
  6. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Persson LG, Lindhe J. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:448-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00693.x
  7. Junker R, Dimakis A, Thoneick M, Jansen JA. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 Suppl 4:185-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01777.x
  8. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Van't Hof MA, Jansen JA, Creugers NH. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: a systematic review. J Dent Res 2006;85:496-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500603
  9. Jung UW, Hwang JW, Choi DY, Hu KS, Kwon MK, Choi SH, et al. Surface characteristics of a novel hydroxyapatite-coated dental implant. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2012; 42:59-63. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2012.42.2.59
  10. Lacefield WR. Hydroxyapatite coatings. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988;523:72-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb38501.x
  11. Hayashi K, Inadome T, Mashima T, Sugioka Y. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of solid hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:557-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820270502
  12. van Dijk K, Schaeken HG, Wolke JC, Maree CH, Habraken FH, Verhoeven J, et al. Influence of discharge power level on the properties of hydroxyapatite films deposited on Ti6A14V with RF magnetron sputtering. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:269-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290218
  13. Lee IS, Zhao B, Lee GH, Choi SH, Chung SM. Industrial application of ion beam assisted deposition on medical implants. Surf Coat Technol 2007;201:5132-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.112
  14. Wikesjo UM, Susin C, Qahash M, Polimeni G, Leknes KN, Shanaman RH, et al. The critical-size supraalveolar peri-implant defect model: characteristics and use. J Clin Periodontol 2006;33:846-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00985.x
  15. Jung UW, Kim CS, Choi SH, Cho KS, Inoue T, Kim CK. Healing of surgically created circumferential gap around non-submerged-type implants in dogs: a histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:171-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01310.x
  16. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003;67:932-49.
  17. Sivolella S, Bressan E, Salata LA, Urrutia ZA, Lang NP, Botticelli D. Osteogenesis at implants without primary bone contact: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:542-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02423.x
  18. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x
  19. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9:332-43.
  20. Stadlinger B, Pourmand P, Locher MC, Schulz MC. Systematic review of animal models for the study of implant integration, assessing the influence of material, surface and design. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39 Suppl 12:28-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01835.x
  21. Chae GJ, Jung UW, Jung SM, Lee IS, Cho KS, Kim CK, et al. Healing of surgically created circumferential gap around nano-coating surface dental implants in dogs. Surf Interface Anal 2008;40:184-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.2745
  22. Jung UW, Kim S, Kim YH, Cha JK, Lee IS, Choi SH. Osseointegration of dental implants installed without mechanical engagement: a histometric analysis in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1297-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02306.x
  23. Song JE, Yoon HJ, Um YJ, Chae GJ, Jung UW, Chung SM, et al. The effect of a multi-treated implant surface on gap defect healing in dogs. Thin Solid Films 2009;517:5352-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.164
  24. Um YJ, Song JE, Chae GJ, Jung UW, Chung SM, Lee IS, et al. The effect of post heat treatment of hydroxyapatite-coated implants on the healing of circumferential coronal defects in dogs. Thin Solid Films 2009;517:5375-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.107

Cited by

  1. The case against the use of dental implants in dogs and cats vol.243, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.243.12.1680
  2. Secondary stability of microthickness hydroxyapatite‐coated dental implants installed without primary stability in dogs vol.25, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12226
  3. Evaluating the osseointegration of nanostructured titanium implants in animal models: Current experimental methods and perspectives (Review) vol.11, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4958793
  4. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Evaluation of the Interface between a Nanostructured Calcium-Incorporated Dental Implant Surface and the Human Bone vol.10, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10121438
  5. Immediate loading of fixed partial prostheses reconstructed using either tapered or straight implants in the posterior area: A randomized clinical trial vol.23, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13039
  6. Secondary stability achieved in dental implants with a calcium‐coated sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (SLA) surface and a chemically modified SLA surface placed without mechanic vol.32, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13848