World Technopolis Review

World Technopolis Association (세계과학도시연합)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CUGAR: A Model for Open Innovation in Science and Technology Parks

  • Narasimhalu, Arcot Desai (School of Information Systems, Institute of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Singapore Management University)
  • Published : 2013.06.10
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper reviews key elements of a Science or Technology Park in the context of open innovation. Insights into and recommendations on key issues related to intellectual property, licensing and venture capital that would be of interest to any Science Park are presented later.

Keywords

References

  1. Battelle Technology Partnership Practice (2007) "Characteristics and Trends in North American Research Parks: 21st Century Directions."
  2. Chesbrough, H.W. (2003) "Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology." (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).
  3. Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L.(2000) "The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations," Research Policy 29: 109-23. Available at http://www.chss.uqam.ca/Portals/0/docs/sts8020/(20)Etzk-Leides.Triple.Helix.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  4. Etzkowitz, H., Dzisah, J., Ranga, M., and Zhou, C. (2007) "University-Industry-Government Interaction: the Triple Helix Model for Innovation," Asia-Pacific Tech Monitor 24 (1): 14-23.
  5. Etzkowitz, H., Dzisah, J., Ranga, M., and Zhou, C. (2007) "The triple Helix Model of Innovation," Techmonitor, (Jan- Feb 2007): 1-23.
  6. International Association of Science Parks http://www.iasp.ws, Accessed in September 2012.
  7. IKP, http://www.ikpknowledgepark.com/content_page.php?id=3, Accessed in September 2012.
  8. Leydesdorff, L., and Etzkowitz, H. (1998) "The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studie," Science & Public Policy 25(3): 195-203.
  9. Marx, K. (1867) Capital, Volume I.
  10. Narasimhalu, A.D. (2007) "A Framework for Technology Transfer," Technology Management for the Global Future, July 2006. PICMET, Istanbul, Turkey 4: 1781-8, Available at doi:10.1109/PICMET.2006.296753.
  11. Narasimhalu, A.D. (2009). "A Method for Monetizing Technology Innovations," The Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Entrepreneurship and Innovation, The University of Antwerp, Belgium, September 10-11, 2009, Available at http://www.academic-conferences.org/pdfs/ECEI09-booklet.pdf.
  12. Wessner, C.W.(ed)(2009) Understanding Research, Science and Technology Parks: Global Best Practice; Report of a symposium, Ed. Committee on Comparative Innovation Policy: Best practice for the 21st Century (Washington DC: National Research Council, National Academies Press).

Cited by

  1. Building Effective Bridges between Science Parks and Universities vol.4, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr2015.4.1.2
  2. Barriers to Openness: The Case of Technology Development Zone Companies vol.3, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.23834/isrjournal.392830
  3. A New Perspective in Science and Technology Park Model (STPM) for Eco-Social Development Using Penta-Helix Concept: Case Study in Sumedang Regency vol.248, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/248/1/012050
  4. STP Development in the Context of Smart City vol.8, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr19s1223.21