DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation Factors on BIM Acceptance

  • Lee, Seul Ki (Graduate School, KwangWoon University) ;
  • Yu, Jung-Ho (Department of Architectural Engineering, KwangWoon University)
  • Received : 2012.11.26
  • Accepted : 2013.03.25
  • Published : 2013.06.20

Abstract

Although many researchers and practitioners are in agreement about the potential applicability and benefit of BIM in construction, it is still unclear why BIM is adopted, and what factors enhance the adoption and implementation of BIM. As such, the mechanism of BIM acceptance and use remains in question. Therefore, this paper aims to identify the key factors affecting the acceptance of BIM in construction organizations, and to analyze the effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation factors on BIM acceptance. The key factors in BIM acceptance are identified through a literature review in TAM (Davis 1989) and related theories, and consolidated by interviews and pilot studies with professionals in the construction industry. Based on the factors, a questionnaire was designed and sent out to a total of 114 construction organizations in Korea, such as contractors, architects, and engineers. Using SPSS 12.0, the data was analyzed to determine the relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation factors and BIM acceptance through multiple regression analysis. These findings will clarify what the highly prioritized factors are, and can also be used in an assessment tool for the performance of BIM utilization.

Keywords

References

  1. Eastman C, Teicholz P, Rafael S, Kathleen L. BIM handbook : a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractor. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2008. 490 p.
  2. Lee JG. BIM Guideline emerges [internet]. Seoul: Public Procurement Service; 2010 Dec. 3p. Available from: http://www.pps.go.kr/user.tdf
  3. Choi HS. An Analysis about Factors affecting Inactiveness of BIM Introduction in the Construction Industry [Master thesis]. [Seoul (Korea)]:Hanyang University; 2010. 60 p.
  4. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies. MIS Quarterly. 1989 Sep;13(3):319-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  5. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model : Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science. 2000 Feb;45(2):186-204.
  6. Venkatesh V, Bala H. TAM 3: Advancing the Technology Acceptance Model with a Focus on Interventions. Decision Sciences. 2008 May;39(2):273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
  7. Lim CH. Organizational Behavior. Seoul: B&MBooks; 2009. 590 p.
  8. McGregor DM. The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1960. 427 p.
  9. Herzberg F. The Motivation-Hygiene Concept and Problems of Manpower. Personnel Administration. 1964 Jan-Feb;27(1):3-7.
  10. Tulke J, Nour M, Beuke K. Decomposition of BIM objects for scheduling and 4D simulation. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Product and Process Modelling in the Building and related Industries; 2008 Sep; France. London (UK): A. A. Balkema Publishers: 2008. p. 653-60.
  11. Beak JS. Affects in Use Intention Air navigator Kiosk of Technology Readiness Index and Technology Acceptance Model [Master thesis]. [Gyeonggiedo (Korea)]: Korea AeroSpase University; 2008. 56 p.
  12. Lee YJ. The Effects of Personal Innovativeness and Self-efficacy on the User's Intention to Use Really Simple Syndication(RSS) Services [Master thesis]. [Seoul (Korea)]: Hongik University; 2009. 79 p.
  13. Han YS, Heyon SY. Effects of Extrinsic reward, Intrinsic/Extrinsic Motivation and Types of Task on Problem Solving. Educational Methodology Studies. 2010 Nov;22(4):21-42.
  14. Kim SJ. Self-efficacy, Innovation, and Interactivity on Users' Motive and Intention to Use DCATV [Master thesis]. [DeaGu (Korea)]: Kyungpook National University; 2010. 113 p.
  15. Park YA. A Study of the influence of personal factors(innovativeness, self-efficacy, knowledge) on the use intention of vehicle navigation-A focus on a moderating effect of gender. Tourism Research. 2011 Dec;26(5):261-76.
  16. Tang WA. Study on the Motivations and Customer Orientation for Job Satisfaction of Hotel Employees-Focused on Luxury Hotels in Guangzhou [Master thesis]. [DeaJeon (Korea)]: Paichai University; 2011. 76 p.
  17. Ko SI, Han JH. The Multi-dimensional Structure of Job motivation. Korean Business Review. 2005 Oct;34(5):1339-63.
  18. Kim EY. Special Issue, intelligent Digital Architecture Tools and BIM paradigm. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2004 Nov;48(11):56-9.
  19. SmartMarket Report. The Business Value of BIM for Infrastructure: Addressing America's Infrastructure Challenges with Collaboration and Technology. Massachusetts: McGrawHill Constructon; 2012. 64 p.
  20. Lee SH, An BJ, Kim JH, Kim KH, Lee YS, Kim JJ. An Analysis on affecting factors about lowly using 3D CAD by using the AHP. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2007 Dec;8(6):188-96.
  21. Park YJ, Won SK, Han CH, Lee JB. A Study on 3D BIM Collaborative Approximate Estimating Model of Structural Work for Apartment Projects. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2011 Jun;27(6):123-30.
  22. An SJ, Lee HS, Park MS, Kim WY. Object-Oriented Modeling of Construction Operations for Schedule-Cost Integration, Based on BIM. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2009 Dec;25(12):165-74.
  23. Froese T, Yu K. Industry Foundation Class Modelling For Estimating And Scheduling, Durability of Building Materials & Components 8. 1999 May;4:2825-35.
  24. Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data And Source of collinearity. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2005. 310 p.
  25. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. 701 p.
  26. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd rev.ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1988. 567 p.

Cited by

  1. Building information modeling acceptance and readiness assessment in Taiwanese architectural firms vol.23, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2015.1128480
  2. Discriminant model of BIM acceptance readiness in a construction organization vol.21, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0555-9