Korean Journal of Radiology

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Digital Tomosynthesis of the Chest: Comparison of Patient Exposure Dose and Image Quality between Standard Default Setting and Low Dose Setting

  • Hwang, Hye Sun (Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Chung, Myung Jin (Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Kyung Soo (Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Published : 2013.06.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: To determine the optimum low dose (LD) digital tomosynthesis (DT) setting, and to compared the image quality of the LD DT with that of the standard default (SD) DT. Materials and Methods: Nine DT settings, by changing tube voltage, copper filter, and dose ratio, were performed for determining the LD setting. Among combinations of DT setting, a condition providing the lowest radiation dose was determined. Eighty artificial nodules less than 1 cm in diameter (subcentimeter nodules: 40, micronodules less than 4 mm: 40) were attached to a Styrofoam and a diaphragm of the phantom. Among these, 38 nodules were located at the periphery of the lung (thin area) and 42 nodules were located at the paravertebral or sub-diaphragmatic area (thick area). Four observers counted the number of nodules detected in the thick and thin areas. The detection sensitivity in SD and LD settings were calculated separately. Data were analyzed statistically. Results: The lowest LD setting was a combination of 100 kVp, 0.3 mm additional copper filter, and a 1 : 5 dose ratio. The effective dose for the LD and SD settings were 62 $\mu$Sv and 140 $\mu$Sv, separately. A 56.7% dose reduction was achieved in the LD setting compared with the SD setting. Detection sensitivities were not different between the SD and the LD settings except between observers 1 and 2 for the detection of micronodules in the thick area. Conclusion: LD DT can be effective in nodule detection bigger than 4 mm without a significant decrease in image quality compared with SD DT.

Keywords

References

  1. Dobbins, JT, Godfrey, DJ,Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential, Phys Med Biol, 48, 1, R65-R106(2003) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/48/19/R01
  2. Vikgren, J, Zachrisson, S, Svalkvist, A, Johnsson, AA, Boijsen, M, Flinck, A,Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases, Radiology, 249, 2, 1034-1041(2008) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2492080304
  3. Brenner, DJ, Hall, EJ,Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure, N Engl J Med, 357, 3, 2277-2284(2007) https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra072149
  4. Hall, EJ, Brenner, DJ,Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology, Br J Radiol, 81, 4, 362-378(2008) https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/01948454
  5. McCollough, CH, Primak, AN, Braun, N, Kofler, J, Yu, L, Christner, J,Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT, Radiol Clin North Am, 47, 5, 27-40(2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.006
  6. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103, Ann ICRP, 37, 6, 1-332(2007)
  7. James, TD, McAdams, HP, Song, JW, Li, CM, Godfrey, DJ, DeLong, DM,Digital tomosynthesis of the chest for lung nodule detection: interim sensitivity results from an ongoing NIH-sponsored trial, Med Phys, 35, 7, 2554-2557(2008) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2937277
  8. Quaia, E, Baratella, E, Cioffi, V, Bregant, P, Cernic, S, Cuttin, R,The value of digital tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary lesions on chest radiography: analysis of diagnostic accuracy and confidence, Acad Radiol, 17, 8, 1267-1274(2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.05.009
  9. Sabol, JM,A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis, Med Phys, 36, 9, 5480-5487(2009) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3250907
  10. Bath, M, Svalkvist, A, von Wrangel, A, Rismyhr-Olsson, H, Cederblad, A,Effective dose to patients from chest examinations with tomosynthesis, Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 139, 10, 153-158(2010) https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq092
  11. Svalkvist, A, Bath, M,Simulation of dose reduction in tomosynthesis, Med Phys, 37, 11, 258-269(2010)
  12. Hamer, OW, Sirlin, CB, Strotzer, M, Borisch, I, Zorger, N, Feuerbach, S,Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration, Radiology, 237, 12, 691-700(2005) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2372041738
  13. Dobbins, JT, Samei, E, Chotas, HG, Warp, RJ, Baydush, AH, Floyd, CE,Chest radiography: optimization of X-ray spectrum for cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector, Radiology, 226, 13, 221-230(2003) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2261012023
  14. MacMahon, H, Austin, JH, Gamsu, G, Herold, CJ, Jett, JR, Naidich, DP,Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society, Radiology, 237, 14, 395-400(2005) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2372041887
  15. Lung Screening Trial Research Team, National,Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening, N Engl J Med, 365, 15, 395-409(2011) https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1102873
  16. Dobbins, JT, McAdams, HP,Chest tomosynthesis: technical principles and clinical update, Eur J Radiol, 72, 16, 244-251(2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.054
  17. Carmichael JHE, Maccia C, Moores BM, Oestmann JW, Schibilla H, Teunen D, et al. EUR 16260 - European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images. Brussels: European Communities, 1996
  18. Kim, EY, Chung, MJ, Lee, HY, Koh, WJ, Jung, HN, Lee, KS,Pulmonary mycobacterial disease: diagnostic performance of low-dose digital tomosynthesis as compared with chest radiography, Radiology, 257, 18, 269-277(2010) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100303
  19. Kim, EY, Chung, MJ, Choe, YH, Lee, KS,Digital tomosynthesis for aortic arch calcification evaluation: performance comparison with chest radiography with CT as the reference standard, Acta Radiol, 53, 19, 17-22(2012) https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2011.110347
  20. Yoo, JY, Chung, MJ, Choi, B, Jung, HN, Koo, JH, Bae, YA,Digital tomosynthesis for PNS evaluation: comparisons of patient exposure and image quality with plain radiography, Korean J Radiol, 13, 20, 136-143(2012) https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.136

Cited by

  1. Effect of radiation dose level on the detectability of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis vol.24, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3182-1
  2. VISIBILITY OF STRUCTURES OF RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS WITH CYSTIC FIBROSIS IN CHEST TOMOSYNTHESIS: INFLUENCE OF ANATOMICAL LOCATION AND OBSERVER EXPERIENCE vol.169, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv556
  3. EFFECT OF RADIATION DOSE LEVEL ON ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF MANUAL SIZE MEASUREMENTS IN CHEST TOMOSYNTHESIS EVALUATED USING SIMULATED PULMONARY NODULES vol.169, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw041
  4. Initial clinical evaluation of stationary digital chest tomosynthesis in adult patients with cystic fibrosis vol.29, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5703-9