DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Rectal hyposensitivity and functional anorectal outlet obstruction are common entities in patients with functional constipation but are not significantly associated

  • Lee, Tae Hee (Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Joon Seong (Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Su Jin (Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jeon, Seong Ran (Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kwon, Soon Ha (Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Wan Jung (Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Gun (Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Won Young (Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Joo Young (Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Oh (Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Ji Sung (Division of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, Korea University)
  • Published : 2013.01.01

Abstract

Background/Aims: The causes of functional anorectal outlet obstruction (outlet obstruction) include functional defecation disorder (FDD), rectocele, and rectal intussusception (RI). It is unclear whether outlet obstruction is associated with rectal hyposensitivity (RH) in patients with functional constipation (FC). The aim of this study was to determine the association between RH and outlet obstruction in patients with FC. Methods: This was a retrospective study using a prospectively collected constipation database, and the population comprised 107 patients with FC (100 females; median age, 49 years). We performed anorectal manometry, defecography, rectal barostat, and at least two tests (balloon expulsion test, electromyography, or colon transit time study). RH was defined as one or more sensory threshold pressures raised beyond the normal range on rectal barostat. We investigated the association between the presence of RH and an outlet obstruction such as large rectocele (> 2 cm in size), RI, or FDD. Results: Forty patients (37.4%) had RH. No significant difference was observed in RH between patients with small and large rectoceles (22 [44.9%] vs. 18 [31%], respectively; p = 0.140). No significant difference was observed in RH between the non-RI and RI groups (36 [36.7%] vs. 4 [30.8%], respectively; p = 0.599). Furthermore, no significant difference in RH was observed between the non-FDD and FDD groups (19 [35.8%] vs. 21 [38.9%], respectively; p = 0.745). Conclusions: RH and outlet obstruction are common entities but appear not to be significantly associated.

Keywords

References

  1. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989;30:1737-1749. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.30.12.1737
  2. Muller-Lissner S. The difficult patient with constipation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2007;21:473-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2007.01.008
  3. Gladman MA, Lunniss PJ, Scott SM, Swash M. Rectal hyposensitivity. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:1140-1151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00604.x
  4. Kiff ES, Barnes PR, Swash M. Evidence of pudendal neuropathy in patients with perineal descent and chronic straining at stool. Gut 1984;25:1279-1282. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.25.11.1279
  5. Solana A, Roig JV, Villoslada C, Hinojosa J, Lledo S. Anorectal sensitivity in patients with obstructed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1996;11:65-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00342462
  6. Rao SS. Dyssynergic defecation and biofeedback therapy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2008;37:569-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2008.06.011
  7. Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR, MacCarty RL, Beart RW, Wolff BG. Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology 1987;92:40-47.
  8. Glia A, Lindberg G, Nilsson LH, Mihocsa L, Akerlund JE. Constipation assessed on the basis of colorectal physiology. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998;33:1273-1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365529850172359
  9. Gladman MA, Scott SM, Williams NS, Lunniss PJ. Clinical and physiological findings, and possible aetiological factors of rectal hyposensitivity. Br J Surg 2003;90:860-866. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4103
  10. Rao SS, Welcher KD, Pelsang RE. Effects of biofeedback therapy on anorectal function in obstructive defecation. Dig Dis Sci 1997;42:2197-2205. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018846113210
  11. Peticca L, Pescatori M. Outlet obstruction due to anismus and rectal hyposensation: effect of biofeedback training. Colorectal Dis 2002;4:67. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00322.x
  12. Lagier E, Delvaux M, Vellas B, et al. Influence of age on rectal tone and sensitivity to distension in healthy subjects. Neurogastroenterol Motil 1999;11:101-107. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2982.1999.00145.x
  13. Hammer HF, Phillips SF, Camilleri M, Hanson RB. Rectal tone, distensibility, and perception: reproducibility and response to different distensions. Am J Physiol 1998;274(3 Pt 1):G584-G590.
  14. Wijffels NA, Angelucci G, Ashrafi A, Jones OM, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. Rectal hyposensitivity is uncommon and unlikely to be the central cause of obstructed defecation in patients with high-grade internal rectal prolapse. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011;23:151-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01625.x
  15. Wingate D, Hongo M, Kellow J, Lindberg G, Smout A. Disorders of gastrointestinal motility: towards a new classification. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;17 Suppl:S1- S14. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1746.17.s1.7.x
  16. Harraf F, Schmulson M, Saba L, et al. Subtypes of constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome based on rectal perception. Gut 1998;43:388-394. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.43.3.388
  17. Houghton LA. Sensory dysfunction and the irritable bowel syndrome. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 1999;13:415-427.
  18. Baldi F, Ferrarini F, Corinaldesi R, et al. Function of the internal anal sphincter and rectal sensitivity in idiopathic constipation. Digestion 1982;24:14-22. https://doi.org/10.1159/000198769
  19. Mimura T, Nicholls T, Storrie JB, Kamm MA. Treatment of constipation in adults associated with idiopathic megarectum by behavioural retraining including biofeedback. Colorectal Dis 2002;4:477-482. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00372.x
  20. Ringel Y, Whitehead WE, Toner BB, et al. Sexual and physical abuse are not associated with rectal hypersensitivity in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 2004;53:838-842. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2003.021725
  21. Lehur PA, Stuto A, Fantoli M, et al. Outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection vs. biofeedback for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with rectal intussusception and rectocele: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:1611-1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9378-1

Cited by

  1. Psychosocial Factors and Rectal Hyposensitivity vol.19, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm.2013.19.3.418
  2. Rectal prolapse traumatizes rectal neuromuscular microstructure explaining persistent rectal dysfunction vol.31, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2649-8
  3. Rectal Hyposensitivity Is Associated With a Defecatory Disorder But Not Delayed Colon Transit Time in a Functional Constipation Population vol.95, pp.19, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000003667
  4. Prokinetics in the Management of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders vol.19, pp.10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-017-0593-6
  5. Poststroke Constipation Is Associated With Impaired Rectal Sensation vol.115, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000479
  6. Ameliorating Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation at Neiguan (PC6) and Zusanli (ST36) Acupoints Combined with Adaptive Biofeedback Training on Functional Outlet Obstruction Constipation vol.2020, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8798974
  7. Digital Rectal Examination Is a Valuable Bedside Tool for Detecting Dyssynergic Defecation: A Diagnostic Study and a Meta-Analysis vol.2021, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5685610
  8. Imaging and clinical assessment of functional defecatory disorders with emphasis on defecography vol.46, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02142-9