The Relationships between The Quality of Teacher-Child Relationship, Teacher-Child Interactions, and Child Temperament

교사-유아관계의 질과 교사-유아 상호작용 및 유아의 기질과의 관계

  • Published : 2013.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relations between the quality of teacher-child relationship, child temperament, and teacher-child interaction. The subjects were 51 3-4 years old children who were attending a preschool in Seoul and their mothers. The mothers of the young children rated child temperament and the head teachers of the children evaluated the quality of teacher-child relationship. The frequency of teacher-child interactions in the classroom was collected through observation during self-selected activities in the classrooms. Observational data included frequency of teacher-initiated interactions and number of child-initiated interactions. The results showed that boys were more likely to have conflictual relationships with teachers and girls were likely to have close relationships with teachers. And lower levels of effortful control were associated with teacher-child conflict. More child-initiated interactions were related to the conflict relationships with teachers. Results suggest that child characteristics and teacher-child interactions contribute to children's relationships with teachers.

본 연구는 교사-유아 관계가 유아의 성별 및 기질과 같은 개인적 특성과 교사-유아 간의 성별에 따라 교사-유아 관계의 특성에 차이가 있는지를 알아보고, 유아의 기질 및 교사-유아 간의 상호작용 빈도와 교사-유아 관계의 관련성을 살펴보았다. 연구대상은 서울시에 소재한 한 유아교육기관에 다니는 만 3~4세 유아 51명과 이들의 어머니 그리고 담임교사이었다. 유아의 기질은 어머니가 평가하였고, 교사-유아관계의 질은 담임교사가 평정하였다. 교사-유아 상호작용은 관찰자에 의해 자유선택활동시간 동안 유아주도 상호작용과 교사주도 상호작용으로 구분하여 빈도를 측정하였다. 자료분석 결과, 유아교사는 여아들과는 친밀한 관계를, 남아들과는 갈등 관계를 더 많이 형성하는 것으로 나타났다. 유아의 기질과 교사-유아 관계에서는 의도적 통제 수준이 낮은 유아일수록 교사와 갈등적인 관계를 형성하는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 교사-유아 관계가 교사-유아 간의 상호작용 특성과 관련이 있는지를 살펴본 결과, 갈등적인 관계를 맺고 있는 유아에 대해 교사는 상호작용을 더 적게 시도하는 경향이 있는 것으로 밝혀졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. 권연희(2011). 남녀 유아의 의도적 통제가 행동 문제에 미치는 영향에 대한 교사-유아 관계의 매개효과. 한국생활과학회지, 20(3), 595-609.
  2. 김선희(2009). 유아의 행동문제에 대한 유아의 기질과 교사-유아관계의 영향. 유아교육연구, 29(5), 203-224.
  3. 박영태, 이경님(2011). 유아의 기질과 어머니의 양육행동 및 교사-유아 관계가 유아의 자기통제에 미치는 영향. 열린유아교육연구, 16(1), 235-256.
  4. 신유림, 윤수정(2009). 교사-유아관계와 유아의 사회적 행동특성 및 유아교육기관 적응의 관련성: 유아 및 교사 지각의 비교. 유아교육연구, 29(5), 5-19.
  5. 안선희(2002). 유아의 어머니, 교사, 또래와의 관계와 유치원 적응. 미래유아교육학회지, 9(3), 163-180.
  6. 이경옥(2004). 유아 기질 척도(CBQ)의 타당화를 위한 기초 연구. 유아교육연구, 24(5), 101-120.
  7. 이진숙(2004). 유아의 어머니, 교사, 또래와의 관계와 보육시설 적응간의 관련성. 열린교육연구, 12(2), 217-235.
  8. 천향숙, 조은진(2011). 교사가 지각하는 교사-유아관계 및 관련 변인 분석. 아동학회지, 32(4), 167-183.
  9. Asendorpf, J. B. (1990). Beyond social withdrawal: Shyness, unsociability, and peer avoidance. Human Development, 33, 250-259. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276522
  10. Baker, J. A. (2006). Contributions of teacher-child relationships to positive school adjustment during elementary school. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.02.002
  11. Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). The teacher-child relationship and children's early school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00029-5
  12. Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78(2), 647-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x
  13. Coplan, R. J., & Prakash, K. (2003). Spending time with teacher: Characteristics of preschoolers who frequently elicit versus initiate interactions with teachers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18(1), 143-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(03)00009-7
  14. Coplan, R. J., Prakash, K., O'Neil, K., & Armer, M. (2004). Do you "want" to play? Distinguishing between conflicted shyness and social disinterests in early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 244-258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.244
  15. Crozier, W. R. (1995). Shyness and self-esteem in middle childhood. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1995.tb01133.x
  16. Eisenhower, A. S., Baker, B. L., & Blacher, J. (2007). Early student-teacher relationships of children with and without intellectual disability: Contributions of behavioral, social, and self-regulatory competence. Journal of School Psychology, 45(4), 363-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.10.002
  17. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301
  18. Howes, C., Phillipsen, L. C., & Peisner-Feinberg, E. (2000). The consistency of perceived teacher-child relationships between preschool and kindergarten. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(99)00044-8
  19. Jerome, E. M., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2009). Teacher-child relationships from kindergarten to sixth grade: Early childhood predictors of teacher-perceived conflict and closeness. Social Development, 18(4), 915-945. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00508.x
  20. Ladd, G. W., & Burgess, K. B. (1999). Charting the relationships trajectories of aggressive, withdrawn, and aggressive/withdrawn children during early grade school. Child Development, 70(4), 910-929. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00066
  21. Liew, J., McTigue, E. M., Barrois, L., & Hughes, J. N. (2008). Adaptive and effortful control and academic self-efficacy beliefs on literacy and math achievement: A longitudinal study on 1st through 3rd graders. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(4), 515-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.07.003
  22. Mash, E. J., & Wolfe, D. A. (1998). 조현춘, 송영혜, 조현재 공역(2001). 아동이상심리학. 서울: 시그마프레스.
  23. Olson, S, L., Sameroff, A. J., D. C., Kerr, D. C., Lopez, N. L., & Wellman, H. M. (2005). Developmental foundations of externalizing problems in young children: The role of effortful control. Development and Psychopathology, 17(1), 25-45.
  24. Pianta, R. C., Nimetz, S. L., & Bennett, E. (1997). Mother-child relationships, teacher-child relationships, and school outcomes in preschool and kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(97)90003-X
  25. Pianta, R. C., & Steinberg, M. (1992). Teacher-child relationships and the process of adjusting to school. New Directions for Child Development, 57, 61-80.
  26. Pianta, R. C., Steinberg, M. S., & Rollins, K. B. (1995). The first two years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children's classroom adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 7(2), 295-312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006519
  27. Prior, M., Smart, D., Sanson, A., & Oberklaid, F. (2000). Does shy-inhibited temperament in childhood lead to anxiety problems in adolescence? Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 39(4), 461-468. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200004000-00015
  28. Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In W. Damon, R. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 99-166). New York: Wiley.
  29. Rudasill, K. M., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2009). Teacher-child relationship quality: The roles of child temperament and teacher-child interactions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(2), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.12.003
  30. Rydell, A., Bohlin, G., & Thorell, L. B. (2005). Representations of attachment to parents and shyness as predictors of children's relationships with teachers and peer competence in preschool. Attachment & Human Development, 7(2), 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730500134282
  31. Saft, E. W., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Teachers' perceptions of their relationships with students: Effects of child age, gender, and ethnicity of teachers and children. School Psychology Quarterly, 16(2), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.16.2.125.18698
  32. Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Social competence at school: Relations between social responsibility and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 61, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061001001