DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Understanding Phytosanitary Irradiation Treatment of Pineapple Using Monte Carlo Simulation

  • Kim, Jongsoon (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering Pusan National University) ;
  • Kwon, Soon-Hong (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering Pusan National University) ;
  • Chung, Sung-Won (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering Pusan National University) ;
  • Kwon, Soon-Goo (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Jong-Min (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Won-Sik (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2013.04.15
  • Accepted : 2013.05.21
  • Published : 2013.06.01

Abstract

Purpose: Pineapple is now the third most important tropical fruit in world production after banana and citrus. Phytosanitary irradiation is recognized as a promising alternative treatment to chemical fumigation. However, most of the phytosanitary irradiation studies have dealt with physiochemical properties and its efficacy. Accurate dose calculation is crucial for ensuring proper process control in phytosanitary irradiation. The objective of this study was to optimize phytosanitary irradiation treatment of pineapple in various radiation sources using Monte Carlo simulation. Methods: 3-D geometry and component densities of the pineapple, extracted from CT scan data, were entered into a radiation transport Monte Carlo code (MCNP5) to obtain simulated dose distribution. Radiation energy used for simulation were 2 MeV (low-energy) and 10 MeV (high-energy) for electron beams, 1.25 MeV for gamma-rays, and 5 MeV for X-rays. Results: For low-energy electron beam simulation, electrons penetrated up to 0.75 cm from the pineapple skin, which is good for controlling insect eggs laid just below the fruit surface. For high-energy electron beam simulation, electrons penetrated up to 4.5 cm and the irradiation area occupied 60.2% of the whole area at single-side irradiation and 90.6% at double-side irradiation. For a single-side only gamma- and X-ray source simulation, the entire pineapple was irradiated and dose uniformity ratios (Dmax/Dmin) were 2.23 and 2.19, respectively. Even though both sources had all greater penetrating capability, the X-ray treatment is safer and the gamma-ray treatment is more widely used due to their availability. Conclusions: These results are invaluable for optimizing phytosanitary irradiation treatment planning of pineapple.

Keywords

References

  1. Andreo, P. 1991. Monte Carlo technique in medical physics. Physics in Medicine and Biology 36:861-920. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/36/7/001
  2. Attix, F. H. 1986. Introduction to radiological physics and radiation dosimetry. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Brown, F. B. 2003. MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, Version 5. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
  4. Cashwell, E. D. and C. J. Everett. 1959. A practical manual on the Monte Carlo method for random walk problem. New York: Pergamon Press.
  5. CFR. 2004. Irradiation in the Production, Processing and Handling of Food, Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, 21 CFR Part 179, Docket No. 2003F-0088. Fed Reg 69(246): 76844-76847.
  6. Du. C. and D. Sun. 2006. Estimating the surface area and volume of ellipsoidal ham using computer vision. Journal of Food Engineering 73:260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.01.029
  7. Elishakoff, I. 2001. Essay on the role of the Monte Carlo method in stochastic mechanics. In: Monte Carlo Simulation, eds. G .I. Schueller, and P. D. Spanos, Abingdon: Balkema
  8. FAOSTAT. 2012. Available at: http://faostat3.fao.org/ home/index.html.
  9. Goni, S. M., E. Purlis and V. O. Salvadori. 2007. Threedimensional reconstruction of irregular foodstuffs. Journal of Food Engineering 82:536-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.03.021
  10. Hallman, G. J. 2011. Phytosanitary applications of irradiation. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 10:143-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00144.x
  11. Hallman, G. J., and L. R. Martinez, 2001. Ionizing irradiation quarantine treatment against Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in citrus fruits. Postharvest Biology and Technology 23:71-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00090-4
  12. Heather, N. W. and G. J. Hallman. 2008. Pest management and phytosanitary trade barriers. Cambridge, MA: CAB International.
  13. IAEA. 2002. Dosimetry for food irradiation. Technical report series 409. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency
  14. Kim, J., R. G. Moreira and M. E. Castell-Perez. 2008. Validation of irradiation of broccoli with a 10 MeV electron beam accelerator. Journal of Food Engineering 86: 595-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.11.018
  15. Kim, J., R. G. Moreira, Y. Huang and M. E. Castell-Perez. 2007. 3-D dose distribution for optimum radiation treatment planning of complex foods. Journal of Food Engineering 79:312-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.01.061
  16. Kim, J., R. G. Rivadeneira, M. E. Castell-Perez and R. G. Moreira. 2006. Development and validation of a methodology for dose calculation in electron beam irradiation of complex-shaped foods. Journal of Food Engineering 74:359-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.03.008
  17. Limohpasmanee, W., P. Keawchoung, S. Segsarnviriya, A. Malakrong, T. Kongratarpon, S. Vongcherree and P. Pransophon. 2005. Irradiation as a quarantine treatment of fruits. In: Proceedings in International Symposium "New Frontier of Irradiated food and Non-Food Products" 22-23 September 2005, KMUTT, Bangkok, Thailand.
  18. Mackie, T. R. 1990. Applications of the Monte Carlo Method in Radiotherapy. In: Dosimetry of Ionizing Radiation, eds. K. Kase, B. Bjarngard and F. H. Attix, New York: Academic Press.
  19. Matsufuji, N., H. Tomoru, Y. Futami, H. Yamashita, A. Higashi, S. Minohara, M. Endo and T. Kanai. 1998. Relationship between CT number and electron density, scatter angle and nuclear reaction for hadrontherapy treatment planning. Physics in Medicine and Biology 43:3261-3275. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/43/11/007
  20. Meissner, J., M. Abs, M. R. Cleland, A. S. Herer, Y. Jongen, F. Kuntz and A. Strasser 2000. X-ray treatment at 5 MeV and above. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 57:647-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-806X(99)00431-4
  21. Miller, R. B. 2005. Electronic irradiation of foods: An introduction to the Technology. Berlin: Springer.
  22. Pimentel, D., M. Pimentel and A. Wilson. 2007. Plant, animal, and microbe invasive species in the USA and the world. In: Biological Invasions, eds. W. Nentwig, pp. 316-330. Berlin: Springer.
  23. Rosenstein, M., H. Eisen and J. Silverman. 1972. Electron depth dose distribution measurements in finite polystyrene slabs. Journal of Applied Physics 43:3191-3201. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1661684
  24. UNEP. 2012. Handbook for the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (12th ed., pp. 11-12). Nairobi, Kenya.
  25. USDA. 2013. Available at: http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/ search/list.
  26. Uyar, R., and F. Erdogdu. 2009. Potential use of 3-dimensional scanners for food process modeling. Journal of Food Engineering 93:337-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.01.034

Cited by

  1. Improving phytosanitary irradiation treatment of mangoes using Monte Carlo simulation vol.149, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.10.005