대한간호학회지 (Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing)

한국간호과학회 (Korean Society of Nursing Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Introduction to Logistic Regression: From Basic Concepts to Interpretation with Particular Attention to Nursing Domain

  • Park, Hyeoun-Ae (College of Nursing and System Biomedical Informatics National Core Research Center, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2013.03.19
  • 심사 : 2013.04.02
  • 발행 : 2013.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this article is twofold: 1) introducing logistic regression (LR), a multivariable method for modeling the relationship between multiple independent variables and a categorical dependent variable, and 2) examining use and reporting of LR in the nursing literature. Methods: Text books on LR and research articles employing LR as main statistical analysis were reviewed. Twenty-three articles published between 2010 and 2011 in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing were analyzed for proper use and reporting of LR models. Results: Logistic regression from basic concepts such as odds, odds ratio, logit transformation and logistic curve, assumption, fitting, reporting and interpreting to cautions were presented. Substantial shortcomings were found in both use of LR and reporting of results. For many studies, sample size was not sufficiently large to call into question the accuracy of the regression model. Additionally, only one study reported validation analysis. Conclusion: Nursing researchers need to pay greater attention to guidelines concerning the use and reporting of LR models.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bagley, S. C., White, H., & Golomb, B. A. (2001). Logistic regression in the medical literature: Standards for use and reporting, with particular attention to one medical domain. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54(10), 979-985. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00372-9
  2. Bewick, V., Cheek, L., & Ball, J. (2004). Statistics review 13: Receiver operating characteristic curves. Critical Care (London, England), 8(6), 508- 512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3000
  3. Bewick, V., Cheek, L., & Ball, J. (2005). Statistics review 14: Logistic regression. Critical Care (London, England), 9(1), 112-118. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/cc3045
  4. Eberhardt, L. L., & Breiwick, J. M. (2012). Models for population growth curves. ISRN Ecology, 2012, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5402/2012/ 815016
  5. Giancristofaro, R. A., & Salmaso, L. (2003). Model performance analysis and model validation in logistic regression. Statistica, 63(2), 375-396.
  6. Harrell, F, E., LEE, K. L., & MARK, D. B. (1996). Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors, Statistics in Medicine, 15, 361-387. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4
  7. Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  8. Hsieh, F. Y., Bloch, D. A., & Larsen, M. D. (1998). A simple method of sample size calculation for linear and logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine, 17(14), 1623-1634.
  9. Katz, M. H. (1999). Multivariable analysis: A practical guide for clinicians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Kleinbaum, D. G., & Klein, M. (2010). Logistic regression(statistics for biology and health) (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
  11. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent vriables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  12. Menard, S. W. (2001). Applied logistic regression analysis (quantitative applications in the social sciences) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  13. Morris, J. A., & Gardner, M. J. (1988). Calculating confidence intervals for relative risks (odds ratios) and standardised ratios and rates. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.), 296(6632), 1313-1316. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.296.6632.1313
  14. Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(12), 1373-1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3
  15. Peng, C. J., Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2002). An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209598786
  16. Peng, C. J., & So, T. H. (2002). Logistic regression analysis and reporting: A primer. Understanding Statistics, 1(1), 31-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0101_04
  17. Tetrault, J. M., Sauler, M., Wells, C. K., & Concato, J. (2008). Reporting of multivariable methods in the medical literature. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 56(7), 954-957. http://dx.doi.org/10.231/JIM.0b013e31818914ff

피인용 문헌

  1. Infrared assessment of knee instability in ACL deficient patients vol.40, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2839-y
  2. Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Use of Public Buses in Delhi vol.142, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000316
  3. Binary Logistic Model for Estimation of Mode Shift into Delhi Metro vol.10, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447801610010124
  4. Proposing stochastic probability-based math model and algorithms utilizing social networking and academic data for good fit students prediction vol.7, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-017-0448-z
  5. Women’s opinion on the justification of physical spousal violence: A quantitative approach to model the most vulnerable households in Bangladesh vol.12, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187884
  6. Suicidal ideation in systemic lupus erythematosus: NR2A gene polymorphism, clinical and psychosocial factors vol.27, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203317742711
  7. The use of geographic information system and 1860s cadastral data to model agricultural suitability before heavy mechanization. A case study from Malta vol.13, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192039
  8. Spatial filtering pipeline evaluation of cortically coupled computer vision system for rapid serial visual presentation vol.5, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263x.2019.1568821
  9. Determining Factors Affecting Consumer’s Decision to Purchase Organic Chicken Meat vol.21, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1060
  10. Determinants of child labour practices in Ghana vol.27, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-018-0935-3
  11. Drivers of Cooperation Activity in Kosovo’s Agriculture vol.9, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9050096
  12. Performance and cost-effectiveness of change burst metrics in predicting software faults vol.60, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-018-1241-7
  13. A Hybrid Computational Intelligence Approach to Groundwater Spring Potential Mapping vol.11, pp.10, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102013
  14. TLUSBoost algorithm: a boosting solution for class imbalance problem vol.23, pp.21, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3629-4
  15. A Review of the Logistic Regression Model with Emphasis on Medical Research vol.7, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4236/jdaip.2019.74012
  16. Sewer Pipes Condition Prediction Models: A State-of-the-Art Review vol.4, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4040064
  17. Assessment of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Rib Fractures on Whole-Body Trauma Computed Tomography vol.21, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0653
  18. Interest to continue farming among agricultural students who is a child of a farmer vol.454, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/454/1/012027
  19. Predicting the Utilization of Mental Health Treatment with Various Machine Learning Algorithms vol.19, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.37394/23205.2020.19.34
  20. Predicting the Utilization of Mental Health Treatment with Various Machine Learning Algorithms vol.19, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.37394/23205.2020.19.34
  21. Machine Learning Algorithms in Cardiology Domain: A Systematic Review vol.13, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2174/1875036202013010025
  22. Knowledge mining on the association between psychological capital and educational qualifications among hospitality employees vol.23, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1597026
  23. Farmers’ Attitudes Towards the Use of Biomass as Renewable Energy-A Case Study from Southeastern Europe vol.12, pp.10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104009
  24. Postpartum depression and its correlates in middle‐class women in Hunan, China vol.14, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12198
  25. Prediction of physical violence in schizophrenia with machine learning algorithms vol.289, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112960
  26. Application of logistic regression analysis in prediction of groundwater vulnerability in gold mining environment: a case of Ilesa gold mining area, southwestern, Nigeria vol.192, pp.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08532-7
  27. Predicting Dysfunctional Human-Dog Dyads vol.33, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2020.1824655
  28. A cross-sectional study to determine factors affecting dental and medical students’ preference for virtual learning during the COVID-19 outbreak vol.6, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05704
  29. A Regression Model for Predicting the Likelihood of Reporting a Crime Based on the Victim’s Demographic Variables and Their Perceptions Towards the Police vol.11, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2020-0003
  30. Community participation in watershed management: analysis of the status and factors affecting community engagement in the upper Gibe basin, South West Ethiopia vol.64, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1762550
  31. Predicting the Safety Climate in Construction Sites of Saudi Arabia: A Bootstrapped Multiple Ordinal Logistic Regression Modeling Approach vol.11, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041474
  32. Performance analysis of Word Embeddings for Cyberbullying Detection vol.1085, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1085/1/012008
  33. Visual light perceptions caused by medical linear accelerator: Findings of machine-learning algorithms in a prospective questionnaire-based case-control study vol.16, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247597
  34. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Model for the Severity Prediction of Drug-Induced Rhabdomyolysis by Using Random Forest vol.34, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00347
  35. Analysis of Unmet Healthcare Needs in Ireland: A Data Mining Approach vol.10, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.c2232.0210321
  36. Automatic Evaluation of Heart Condition According to the Sounds Emitted and Implementing Six Classification Methods vol.9, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030317
  37. Talking about Sustainability: How the Media Construct the Public’s Understanding of Sustainable Food in Romania vol.13, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094609
  38. Assessing risk factors associated with urban transit bus involved accident severity: a case study of a Middle East country vol.26, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2020.1718465
  39. Does engagement with frontline health workers improve maternal and child healthcare utilisation and outcomes in India? vol.19, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00592-1
  40. Development of a prediction models for chemotherapy-induced adverse drug reactions: A retrospective observational study using electronic health records vol.56, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102066
  41. A comparison of neural and non-neural machine learning models for food safety risk prediction with European Union RASFF data vol.134, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108697