DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Plants Containing Secondary Compounds with Palm Oil on Feed Intake, Digestibility, Microbial Protein Synthesis and Microbial Population in Dairy Cows

  • Anantasook, N. (Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Wanapat, M. (Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Cherdthong, A. (Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Gunun, P. (Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University)
  • Received : 2012.12.12
  • Accepted : 2013.02.14
  • Published : 2013.06.01

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of rain tree pod meal with palm oil supplementation on feed intake, digestibility, microbial protein synthesis and microbial populations in dairy cows. Four, multiparous early-lactation Holstein-Friesian crossbred (75%) lactating dairy cows with an initial body weight (BW) of $405{\pm}40$ kg and $36{\pm}8$ DIM were randomly assigned to receive dietary treatments according to a $4{\times}4$ Latin square design. The four dietary treatments were un-supplementation (control), supplementation with rain tree pod meal (RPM) at 60 g/kg, supplementation with palm oil (PO) at 20 g/kg, and supplementation with RPM at 60 g/kg and PO at 20 g/kg (RPO), of total dry matter intake. The cows were offered concentrates, at a ratio of concentrate to milk production of 1:2, and chopped 30 g/kg of urea treated rice straw was fed ad libitum. The RPM contained condensed tannins and crude saponins at 88 and 141 g/kg of DM, respectively. It was found that supplementation with RPM and/or PO to dairy cows diets did not show negative effects on feed intake and ruminal pH and BUN at any times of sampling (p>0.05). However, RPM supplementation resulted in lower crude protein digestibility, $NH_3$-N concentration and number of proteolytic bacteria. It resulted in greater allantoin absorption and microbial crude protein (p<0.05). In addition, dairy cows showed a higher efficiency of microbial N supply (EMNS) in both RPM and RPO treatments. Moreover, NDF digestibility and cellulolytic bacteria numbers were highest in RPO supplementation (p<0.05) while, supplementation with RPM and/or PO decreased the protozoa population in dairy cows. Based on this study, supplementation with RPM and/or PO in diets could improve fiber digestibility, microbial protein synthesis in terms of quantity and efficiency and microbial populations in dairy cows.

Keywords

References

  1. Anantasook, N. and M. Wanapat. 2012. Influence of rain tree pod meal supplementation on rice straw based diets using in vitro gas fermentation technique. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 25:325-334. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11131
  2. Anantasook, N., M. Wanapat and A. Cherdthong. 2013. Manipulation of ruminal fermentation and methane production by supplementation of rain tree pod meal containing tannins and saponins in growing dairy steers. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12029
  3. Abdl-Rahman, M. A. 2010. In vitro manipulation of rumen fermentation efficiency by fumaric acid-bentonite coupled addition as an alternative to antibiotics. J. Agric. Sci. 2:174-180.
  4. AOAC. 1995. Official Method of Analysis, 16th ed. Animal Feeds: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, VA, USA.
  5. Barry, T. N. and T. R. Manley. 1984. The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of Lotus pedunculatus for sheep. 2. Quantitative digestion of carbohydrates and proteins. Br. J. Nutr. 51:493-504. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19840055
  6. Chanthakhoun, V., M. Wanapat, C. Wachirapakorn and S. Wanapat. 2011. Effect of legume (Phaseolus calcaratus) hay supplementation on rumen microorganisms, fermentation and nutrient digestibility in swamp buffalo. Livest. Sci. 140:17-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.02.003
  7. Chen, X. B. and M. J. Gomes. 1995. Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivative-an overview of 215 the technique details. Occasional Publication 1992. International Feed Resources Unit, Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, UK.
  8. Cowan, M. M. 1999. Plants products as antimicrobial agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12:564-582.
  9. Crocker, C. L. 1967. Rapid determination of urea nitrogen in serum or plasma without deproteinization. Am. J. Med. Technol. 33:361-365.
  10. Devendra, C. and D. Lewis. 1973. The interaction between dietary lipids and fibre in the sheep 1. A comparison of the methods used for crude fibre and acid-detergent fibre estimations. Anim. Prod. 17:275-280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100017062
  11. Dutta, T. K., M. K. Agnihotri and S. B. N. Rao. 2008. Effect of supplemental palm oil on nutrient utilization, feeding economics and carcass characteristics in post-weaned Muzafarnagari lambs under feedlot condition. Small Rumin. Res. 78:66-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.05.002
  12. European Union. 2003. Regulation (EC) No. 1831/2003 of the European parliament of the council o 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition. Off. J. Eur. Union, 268:29-43.
  13. Firkins, J. L., Z. Yu and M. Morrison. 2007. Ruminal nitrogen metabolism: perspectives for integration of microbiology and nutrition for dairy. J. Dairy Sci. 90:E1-E16. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-518
  14. Francis, G., Z. Kerem, H. P. S. Makkar and K. Becker. 2002. The biology action of saponis in animal systems: A review. Br. J. Nutr. 88:587-605. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN2002725
  15. Galo, E., S. M. Emanuele, C. J. Sniffen, J. H. White and J. R. Knapp. 2003. Effects of a polymer-coated urea product on nitrogen metabolism in lactating Holstein dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 86:2154-2162. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73805-3
  16. Galyean, M. 1989. Laboratory Procedures in Animal Nutrition Research. New Mexico State University.
  17. Grobner, M. A., D. E. Johnson, S. R. Goodall and D. A. Benz. 1982. Sarsaponin effects on in vitro continuous flow fermentation of a high grain diet. J. Anim. Sci. 55:491-497.
  18. Guo, Y. Q., J. X. Liu, Y. Lu, W. Y. Zhu, S. E. Denman and C. S. McSweeney. 2008. Effect of tea saponin on methanogenesis, microbial community structure and expression of mcrA gene, in cultures of rumen micro-organisms. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 47:421-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02459.x
  19. Hristov, A. N. and J. P. Jouany. 2005. Factors affecting the efficiency of nitrogen utilization in the rumen. In: Nitrogen and Phosphorus Nutrition of Cattle and Environment (Ed. A. N. Hristov and E. Pfeffer). CAB International, Wallingford, UK. 117-166.
  20. Hungate, R. E. 1969. The Rumen and Its Microbes. Academic Press. New York.
  21. Jones, G. A., T. A. McAllister, A. D. Muir and K. J. Cheng. 1994. Effects of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) condensed tannins on growth and proteolysis by four strains of ruminal bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:1374-1378.
  22. Jouany, J. P. 1996. Effect of rumen protozoa on nitrogen utilization by ruminants. J. Nutr. 126:1335-1346.
  23. Kamra, D. N., A. K. Patra, P. N. Chatterjee, K. Ravindra, A. Neeta and L. C. Chaudhary. 2008. Effect of plant extract on methanogenesis and microbial profile of the rumen of buffalo. A brief overview. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 48:175-178. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07268
  24. Kamra, D. N., N. Agarwal and L. C. Chaudhary. 2006. Inhibition of ruminal methanogenesis by tropical plants containing secondary compounds. Int. Congr. Ser. 1293:156-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2006.02.002
  25. Klita, P. T., G. W. Mathison, T. W. Fenton and R. T. Hardin. 1996. Effect of alfalfa root saponins on digestive function in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 74:1144-1156.
  26. Kongmun, P., M. Wanapat, P. Pakdee and C. Navanukraw. 2010. Effect of coconut oil and garlic powder on in vitro fermentation using gas production technique. Livest. Sci. 127:38-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.08.008
  27. Lunsin, R., M. Wanapat, C. Yuangklang and P. Rowlinson. 2012. Effect of rice bran oil supplementation on rumen fermentation, milk yield and milk composition in lactating dairy cows. Livest. Sci. 145:167-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.01.015
  28. Makkar, H. P. S. 2003. Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin rich feeds. Small Rumin. Res. 49:241-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00142-1
  29. Mao, H. L., J. K. Wang, Y. Y. Zhou and J. X. Liu. 2010. Effects of addition of tea saponins and soybean oil on methane production, fermentation and microbial population in the rumen of growing lambs. Livest. Sci. 129:56-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.12.011
  30. Mapato, C., M. Wanapat and A. Cherdthong. 2010. Effect of urea treatment of straw and dietary level of vegetable oil on lactating dairy cows. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 42:1635-1642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9613-3
  31. Newbold, C. J., S. M. Hassan, J. Wang, M. E. Ortega and R. J. Wallace. 1997. Influence of foliage from African multipurpose trees on activity of rumen protozoa and bacteria. Br. J. Nutr. 78:237-249. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19970143
  32. Ngamsaeng, A., M. Wanapat and S. Khampa. 2006. Evaluation of local tropical plants by in vitro rumen fermentation and their effects on fermentation end-products. Pak. J. Nutr. 5:414-418. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2006.414.418
  33. Otaru, S. M., A. M. Adamu, O. W. Ehoche and H. J. Makun. 2011. Effects of varying the level of palm oil on feed intake, milk yield and composition and postpartum weight changes of Red Sokoto goats. Small Rumin. Res. 96:25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.11.004
  34. Palmquist, D. L. 1994. The role of dietary fats in efficiency of ruminants. J. Nutr. 124:1377S-1382S.
  35. Patra, A. K. 2011. Effects of essential oils on rumen fermentation, microbial ecology and ruminant production. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 6:416-428. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2011.416.428
  36. Pilajun, R. and M. Wanapat. 2011. Effect of coconut oil and mangosteen peel supplementation on ruminal fermentation, microbial population, and microbial protein synthesis in swamp buffaloes. Livest. Sci. 141:148-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.05.013
  37. Roseler, D. K., J. D. Ferguson, C. J. Sniffen and J. Herrema. 1993. Dietary protein degradability effects on plasma and milk urea nitrogen and milk non protein in Holstein cow. J. Dairy Sci. 76:525-534. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77372-5
  38. Russell, J. B. and A. J. Houlihan. 2003. Ionophore resistance of ruminal bacteria and its potential impact on human health. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27:65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00019-6
  39. Sallam, S. M. A., I. C. S. Bueno, P. Brigide, P. B. Godoy, D. M. S. S. Vitti and A. L. Abdalla. 2009. Efficacy of eucalyptus oil on in vitro ruminal fermentation and methane production. Options Mediterraneennes 85:267-272.
  40. SAS. 1996. User's Guide: Statistic, Version 5. Edition. SAS. Inst, Cary, NC, USA.
  41. Smith, A. H., E. Zoetendal and R. I. Mackie. 2005. Bacterial mechanisms to overcome inhibitory effects of dietary tannins. Microb. Ecol. 50:197-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-004-0180-x
  42. Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, NY, USA.
  43. Van Keulen, J. and B. A. Young. 1977. Evaluation of acid insoluble ash as a neutral marker in ruminant digestibility studies. J. Anim. Sci. 44:282-287.
  44. Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  45. Wanapat, M. 1999. Feeding of ruminants in the tropicals base on local feed resources. Khon Kaen Publishing Company Ltd., Khon Kaen, Thailand. 236.
  46. Wanapat, M., C. Mapato, R. Pilajun and W. Toburan. 2010. Effects of vegetable oil supplementation on feed intake, rumen fermentation, growth performance, and carcass characteristic of growing swamp buffaloes. Livest. Sci. 135:32-37.
  47. Wang, J. K., J. A. Ye and J. X. Liu. 2012. Effects of tea saponins on rumen microbiota, rumen fermentation, methane production and growth performance-a review. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 44:697-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9960-8
  48. Wang, Y., T. A. McAllister, L. J. Yanke and P. R. Cheeke. 2000. Effect of steroidal saponin from Yucca schidigera extract on ruminal microbes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 88:887-896. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01054.x
  49. Wina, E., S. Muetzel, E. Hoffmann, H. P. S. Makkar and K. Becker. 2005. Saponins containing methanol extract of Sapindus rarak affect microbial fermentation, microbial activity and microbial community structure in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 121:159-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.02.016

Cited by

  1. on rumen environment, milk yield and milk composition in lactating dairy cows vol.99, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12198
  2. On-farm feeding interventions to increase milk production in lactating dairy cows vol.49, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1268-x
  3. Rambutan fruit peel powder and dietary protein level influencing on fermentation characteristics, nutrient digestibility, ruminal microorganisms and gas production using in vitro fermentation techniques pp.1573-7438, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01837-x
  4. Effect of (Leucaena leucocephala) Leaves as Tannin Source on Rumen Microbial Enzyme Activities and In Vitro Gas Production Kinetics vol.478, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/478/1/012088
  5. Effects of different sources and levels of tannins on live performance and antioxidant response of Ossimi lambs vol.158, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859620000684
  6. Effect of soybean meal replacement by slow-release urea on ruminal parameter, blood metabolites, and microbial protein synthesis in Zel ram vol.43, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v43i1.48684
  7. Dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus) peel pellet as a rumen enhancer in Holstein crossbred bulls vol.34, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0151
  8. Effects of plant extract supplementations or monensin on nutrient intake, digestibility, ruminal fermentation and metabolism in dairy cows vol.275, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114886
  9. Effects of Bacillus megatherium 1259 on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation, and Blood Biochemical Parameters in Holstein Bull Calves vol.11, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082379
  10. Manipulation of In Vitro Ruminal Fermentation and Feed Digestibility as Influenced by Yeast Waste-Treated Cassava Pulp Substitute Soybean Meal and Different Roughage to Concentrate Ratio vol.7, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7030196
  11. Mitigating rumen methane and enhancing fermentation using rambutan fruit peel powder and urea in lactating dairy cows vol.105, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13526
  12. The Effects of Oil Palm Fronds Silage Supplemented with Urea-Calcium Hydroxide on Rumen Fermentation and Nutrient Digestibility of Thai Native-Anglo Nubian Goats vol.7, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7040218
  13. Mitragyna speciosa Korth Leaves Supplementation on Feed Utilization, Rumen Fermentation Efficiency, Microbial Population, and Methane Production In Vitro vol.8, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8010008