한국전문물리치료학회지 (Physical Therapy Korea)

  • 제20권2호
  • /
  • Pages.46-51
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1225-8962(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-982X(eISSN)
한국전문물리치료학회 (Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

엄지발가락휨각도 측정을 위한 각도계의 신뢰도와 타당도

Reliability and Validity of the Goniometer for Hallux Valgus Angle Measurement

  • 정성대 (연세대학교 대학원 물리치료학과) ;
  • 강선영 (연세대학교 대학원 물리치료학과) ;
  • 김문환 (원주 세브란스 기독병원 재활의학과) ;
  • 원종혁 (중부대학교 물리치료학과)
  • Choung, Sung-Dae (Dept. of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kang, Sun-Young (Dept. of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Moon-Hwan (Dept. of Rehabilitation medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital) ;
  • Weon, Jong-Hyuck (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Joongbu University)
  • 투고 : 2013.03.13
  • 심사 : 2013.04.18
  • 발행 : 2013.05.21
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of goniometer measurements of the hallux valgus angle (HVA) compared to radiographic measurements, which are the current standard. Twenty subjects (10 female, 10 male) were recruited for this study (40 feet). The HVA of the subjects was measured using goniometer and radiographic measurement. In three trials, measurements were taken of each subject by two examiners using goniometer and radiographic measurements using radiography in a standing position. The reliability of the measurements was investigated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(3,1)), and the validity was tested using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient and an independent t-test. The intra-rater reliability of left and right HVAs were poor (ICC=.409 and .341, respectively). The inter-rater reliability of left and right HVAs were poor and moderate (ICC=.303 and .501, respectively). Left and right HVAs measured using goniometer and radiographic measurements were also poor and moderate (Pearson r=.246 and .544, respectively). These results suggest that goniometer measurements of the HVA are inaccurate and have unacceptable validity compared to radiographic measurements.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Al-Abdulwahab SS, Al-Dosry RD. Hallux valgus and preferred shoe types among young healthy Saudi Arabian females. Ann Saudi Med. 2000;20(3-4):319-321. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2000.319
  2. Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(6):932-966. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199606000-00018
  3. Coughlin MJ. Hallux valgus in men: Effect of the distal metatarsal articular angle on hallux valgus correction. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(8):463-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079701800802
  4. Coughlin MJ, Freund E. Roger A. Mann Award. The reliability of angular measurements in hallux valgus deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22(5): 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070102200503
  5. Coughlin MJ, Jones CP. Hallux valgus: Demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(7):759-777. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0759
  6. Coughlin MJ, Thompson FM. The high price of high-fashion footwear. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:371-377.
  7. Hardy RH, Clapham JC. Observations on hallux valgus; based on a controlled series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951;33-B(3):376-391. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.33B3.376
  8. Lamur KS, Huson A, Snijders CJ, et al. Geometric data of hallux valgus feet. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17(9):548-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079601700907
  9. Mann RA, Rudicel S, Graves SC. Repair of hallux valgus with a distal soft-tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(1):124-129. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274010-00016
  10. Nix S, Russell T, Vicenzino B, et al. Validity and reliability of hallux valgus angle measured on digital photographs. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(7):642-648. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.3841
  11. Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B. Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;27;3:21. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-21.
  12. Piggott H. The natural histroy of hallux valgus in adolescence and early adult life. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1960;42-B(4):749-760. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.42B4.749
  13. Pique-Vidal C, Maled-Garcia I, Arabi-Moreno J, et al. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Differences between measurements made manually and with a computerized program. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(3):175-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070602700304
  14. Pouliart N, Haentjens P, Opdecam P. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of wilson osteotomy for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17(7):388-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079601700706
  15. Robinson AH, Cullen NP, Chhaya NC, et al. Variation of the distal metatarsal articular angle with axial rotation and inclination of the first metatarsal. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(12):1036-1040. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070602701207
  16. Roddy E, Zhang W, Doherty M. Validation of a self-report instrument for assessment of hallux valgus. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15(9):1008-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2007.02.016
  17. Saro C, Johnson DN, Martinez De Aragon J, et al. Reliability of radiological and cosmetic measurements in hallux valgus. Acta Radiol. 2005;46(8):843-851. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850500270852
  18. Schneider W, Csepan R, Knahr K. Reproducibility of the radiographic metatarsophalangeal angle in hallux surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(3):494-499. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200303000-00015
  19. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86 (2):420-428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
  20. Srivastava S, Chockalingam N, El Fakhri T. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010a;49(6):523-528. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2010.07.012
  21. Srivastava S, Chockalingam N, El Fakhri T. Radiographic measurements of hallux angles: A review of current techniques. Foot (Edinb). 2010b;20(1):27-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2009.12.002
  22. Walter R, Kosy JD, Cove R. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of a smartphone application for measuring hallux valgus angles. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;19(1):18-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2012.08.004

피인용 문헌

  1. Intra- and Inter-rater Reliabilities of Infrasternal Angle Measurement vol.27, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2015.27.3.154
  2. 엄지발가락가쪽휨증의 발가락벌리기 운동 시 초음파 영상을 이용한 시각적 피드백의 효과 vol.23, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2016.23.3.021
  3. A Study on the Reliability and Validity of Measuring the Range of Motion of the Elbow Joint Using a Smartphone Application vol.10, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7236/ijibc.2018.10.3.65
  4. 다양한 발목각도에 따른 발가락벌리기 운동이 엄지벌림근 단면적에 미치는 영향 vol.15, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2020.15.2.121