DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Psychosocial Risks: Is Risk Management Strategic Enough in Business and Policy Making?

  • Langenhan, Melissa K. (Centre for Organizational Health & Development, University of Nottingham) ;
  • Leka, Stavroula (Centre for Organizational Health & Development, University of Nottingham) ;
  • Jain, Aditya (Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham)
  • Received : 2012.11.21
  • Accepted : 2013.03.02
  • Published : 2013.06.30

Abstract

Background: In times of continuous change and volatile markets, organizations are increasingly characterized by downsizing, work intensification, and resource rationalization. This has resulted in diversification, and the emergence of newrisks within the field of occupational health and safety, with an important impact. This paper focuses on one such type of risk in the modern workplace-psychosocial risks. The current study aimed to explore stakeholder perspectives, regarding the extent to which psychosocial risks are incorporated into strategic risk management practices, at both the business and policy level. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 professionals, representing employer, expert, policy maker, and trade union stakeholder perspectives. Results: It was found that the majority of organizations do not sufficiently, if at all, understand and incorporate psychosocial risks into strategic decision making, whereby the key barrier related to practical difficulties of not knowing how to manage psychosocial risks adequately. Conclusion: The study found that there is a need to close the gap between policy and practice on a number of levels. Future recommendations comprise a policy framework and infrastructure underpinned by educational initiatives, partnerships, and networks to drive a shift in attitudes toward recognizing the duality of the concept of risk (including both potential negative and positive outcomes) and moving beyond simple regulatory compliance.

Keywords

Cited by

  1. Do Italian Companies Manage Work-Related Stress Effectively? A Process Evaluation in Implementing the INAIL Methodology vol.2015, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/197156
  2. An Evaluation of the Policy Context on Psychosocial Risks and Mental Health in the Workplace in the European Union: Achievements, Challenges, and the Future vol.2015, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/213089
  3. Psychosocial risk management: calamity or opportunity? vol.66, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqv173
  4. Checklist for psychosocial risk evaluation: a prospective evaluation study vol.67, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqw151
  5. Developing a concept for external audits of psychosocial risks in certified occupational health and safety management systems vol.99, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.11.023
  6. Prévenir les risques psychosociaux : une étude des perceptions et des pratiques des employeurs vol.73, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7202/1044431ar
  7. Securing the embeddedness of psychosocial diffusion indicators into the Turkish construction industry : Silence is no longer golden vol.23, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmpc-10-2017-0040
  8. Consideration of psychosocial factors in workplace risk assessments: findings from a company survey in Germany vol.92, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01416-5
  9. The APHIRM toolkit: an evidence-based system for workplace MSD risk management vol.20, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2828-1
  10. Caractériser un champ institutionnel en phase de structuration : monographie d’une approche de la prévention des risques psychosociaux vol.24, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7202/1077350ar
  11. Interventions as the centrepiece of psychosocial risk assessment - why so difficult? vol.13, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwhm-07-2018-0098
  12. Psychosocial Risk Management in the Teaching Profession: A Systematic Review vol.11, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2020.09.007
  13. Correlation between psychosocial work factors and the degree of stress vol.69, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-213473
  14. A Hierarchical Solution Approach for Occupational Health and Safety Inspectors' Task Assignment Problem vol.12, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2021.01.004
  15. Using Total Worker Health® Implementation Guidelines to Design an Organizational Intervention for Low-Wage Food Service Workers: The Workplace Organizational Health Study vol.18, pp.17, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179383