Journal of The Korean Society of Integrative Medicine (대한통합의학회지)

Korean Society of Integrative Medicine (대한통합의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Snoezelen and Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation(Rehacom) on Improvement of Cognitive Function

스노젤렌과 전산화 인지재활 프로그램(Rehacom)이 인지기능 향상에 미치는 영향

  • Song, Minok (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kyungnam College of Information & Technology) ;
  • Kim, Moungjin (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kyungnam College of Information & Technology) ;
  • You, Youngmin (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kyungnam College of Information & Technology) ;
  • Lee, Hyangjin (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kyungnam College of Information & Technology) ;
  • Yang, Giung (Wooridul Sling Training Center)
  • 송민옥 (경남정보대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김명진 (경남정보대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 유영민 (경남정보대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 이향진 (경남정보대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 양기웅 (우리들 슬링운동센터)
  • Received : 2013.09.08
  • Accepted : 2013.09.25
  • Published : 2013.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose : This study aims to investigate the effect of the Snoezelen and Rehacom programs on improvement of attention and memory, and the effect of the Snoezelen program on stress reduction. Method : This study was targeted at 11 subjects in the Snoezelen experimental group, 11 subjects in the Rehacom group and 11 subjects in the non-experimental group. As the initial evaluation, all the subjects took electroencephalography. Then, the Snoezelen group and Rehacom group did Snoezelen training and Rehacom training, respectively total 12 times(for 20 minutes twice per week for six weeks), but no training was applied to the control group. Three weeks after the training, the interim was carried out, and four weeks after the training, the final evaluation was carried out. Results : Subjects' attention increased to $58.15{\pm}4.96$ from $43.75{\pm}4.69$ during the Snoezelen training, and increased to $49.85{\pm}1.91$ from $43.28{\pm}2.71$ during the Rehacom training, which means the Snoezelen training was more effective in improving attention(P<0.05). Subjects' memory increased to $56.14{\pm}1.26$ from $43.19{\pm}3.46$ during the Snoezelen training, and increased to $50.94{\pm}4.0$ from $43.07{\pm}2.58$ during the Rehacom training. This also implies that the Snoezelen training was more effective in improving memory(P<0.05). Conclusion : Though both of the Snoezelen training and Rehacom training improved attention and memory, the Snoezelen program was more effective, and it also influenced stress resistance and physical arousal.

Keywords

References

  1. 권재성, 김영근, 김지연 등(2008). 작업치료사를 위한 인지재활과 치료. 서울, 퍼시픽북스
  2. 김경숙(2003). 향기 흡입이 중년기 여성의 심리와 생리 반응에 미치는 효과에 관한 예비연구. 간호학 탐구, 12(2), 168-186.
  3. 박영례, 오두남, 김금순 등(2011). 스노젤렌 중재연구 논문분석. 재활간호학회지, 14 (2), 95-102.
  4. 박희수(2003). 인지재활 훈련이 강박장애 환자의 기억과 임상증상에 미치는 효과 : 조직화전략 훈련을 중심으로. 가톨릭대학교, 석사학위 논문.
  5. 신유선, 조영숙, 정유진(2004). 아로마 요법이 뇌졸중 환자의 자율신경계와 스트레스에 대한 신체 저항도에 미치는 효과, 대한기초간호자연과학회지, 6(2), 5-17.
  6. 용준환, 이지연(2006). 다감각환경(스노즐렌) 적용이 인체의 자율신경계에 미치는 영향. 대한작업치료학회지, 14(3), 17-25.
  7. 유은영, 이지연, 황수연(2005). 치매 노인을 위한 스노젤렌 프로그램의 적용 효과. 대한작업치료학회지, 13(3), 33-42.
  8. 이상헌(2004). 스노젤렌(Snoezelen) 공간이 중증도 정신지체 아동의 자기자극 행동에 미치는 치료적 영향. 대한작업치료학회지, 12(2), 73-81.
  9. 이선명(2010). 스노젤렌치료가 인지기능 향상에 미치는 영향. 고령자치매작업치료학회지, 4(1), 11-20.
  10. 이정모, 김민식, 감기택 등(2003). 인지 심리학. 서울, 학지사.
  11. 장철, 권지인, 문현길 등(2008). 전산화 인지 재활 프로그램(REHACOM)과 자연의 소리가 주의집중력 향상에 미치는 효과. 대한건강과학학회지, 5(1), 75-88.
  12. 하규섭, 권준수, 류인권 등(2002). 한국 성인 인지기능 평가를 위한 전산화 검사도구의 개발과 표준화 과정 및 요인분석. 신경정신의학, 41(3), 551-562.
  13. Baker R, Dowling Z, Wareing LA, et al(1997). Snoezelen: Its long-term and short-term effects on older people with dementia. Br J Occup Ther, 60(5), 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269706000507
  14. Bunsen(1994). A study in the use and implications of the snoezelen resource at Limington House School. In R. Hutchinson & J. Kewin (Eds.), Sensations and Disability: Sensory environments for Leisure, Education & Therapy, 138-162. Chesterfield, ROMPA.
  15. Chitsey AM, Haight BK, Joens MM(2002). $Snoezelen^{(R)}$: A Multisensory environmental intervention. J Gerontological Nursing, 28(3), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.3928/0098-9134-20020301-09
  16. Cuvo AJ, May ME, Post TM(2001). Effects of living room, snoezelen room, and outdoor activities on stereotypic behavior and engagement by adults with profound mental retardation. Res Develop Disabil, 22(3), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(01)00067-1
  17. Diamond PT, Felsenthal G, Macciocchi SN, et al(1996). Effect of cognitive impairment on rehabilitation outcome. Arch Phy Med Rehabil, 75, 40-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-199601000-00011
  18. Dobkin BH(2002). Cognitive rehabilitation : An intergrative neuropsychological approach. Neurology, 58, 1578. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.58.10.1578
  19. McKenzie C(1995). Brightening the lives of elderly residents through Snoezelen. Elderly Care, 7(5), 11.
  20. Maloney CC, Daily T(1986). An eclecric group program for nursing home residents with dementia. Phy Occup Ther Geriat, 4(3), 55-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/J148v04n03_05
  21. Kewin J(1992). Snoezelen: The reason and the method. In R. Hutchinson & J. Kewin (Eds.), Sensations and disability: Sensory environments for leisure, education and therapy. 6-17. Chesterfield, ROMPA.
  22. Kewin J(1994). Snoezelen: The reason and the method. In : Sensations and disability: Sensory environments for leisure, education and therapy. Chesterfield, ROMPA.
  23. Lotan A, Shapiro M(2005). Management of young children with Rett disorder in controlled multi-sensory (Snoezelen) environment. Brain and Development, 27(1), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.2003.09.014
  24. Shapiro M, Parush S, Green M(1997). The efficacy of the 'Snoezelen' in the management of children with mental retardation who exhibit maladaptive behaviors. Br J Develop Disabil, 43(85), 140-155. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjdd.1997.014
  25. Slevin E, McClelland A(1999). Multisensory environment: Are they therapeutic? A single subject evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of a multisensory environment. J Clin Nurs, 8(1), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.1999.00211.x
  26. Spaul D, Leach C, Frampton I(1998). An evaluation of effects of sensory stimulation with people who have dementia. Behav Cognitive Psychother, 26(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465898000083
  27. Thompson SB, Martin S(1994). Making sense of multisensory rooms for people with learning disabilities. Br J Occup Ther, 57(9), 341-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269405700904
  28. Withers PS, Ensum I(1995). Successful treatment of severe self injury incorporating use of DRO, a Snoezelen room and orientation cues. Br J Learning Disabil, 23(4), 164-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1995.tb00189.x