DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Insecticidal Activity of 27 Insecticides to Pear Psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola (Foerster) (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Jincheon

진천지역 꼬마배나무이에 대한 27종 약제의 살충효과

  • Park, Jun-Won (Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Young-Uk (Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • An, Jeong-Jin (Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Eun (Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Choi, Jang-Jeon (Pear Research Station, NIHHS, RDA) ;
  • Koo, Hyun-Na (Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Gil-Hah (Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University)
  • 박준원 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 박영욱 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 안정진 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 박상은 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 최장전 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 배시험장) ;
  • 구현나 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 김길하 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과)
  • Received : 2013.01.28
  • Accepted : 2013.03.04
  • Published : 2013.03.31

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the susceptibility and control efficacy of 27 registered insecticides against pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola in laboratory and field (Jincheon). Mortality of 3rd instar of C. pyricola was higher treated with pyrifluquinazon WG (97.7%), flonicamid WG (94.7%), abamectin EC (92.8%), and acetamiprid+buprofezin EC (86.8%) sprayed with field recommended concentration using a prayer in laboratory. These four insecticides also showed control effects of > 90% at 5 days after treatment in field.

국내에 꼬마배나무이(Cacopsylla pyricola)의 방제약제로 등록되어 있는 27종의 약제를 사용하여 진천지역 꼬마배나무이에 대한 실내에서의 살충활성과 야외에서의 방제효과를 조사하였다. 그 결과 3령 약충에 대한 실내 스프레이 검정에서는 abamectin EC, acetamiprid + buprofezin EC, pyrifluquinazon WG, 그리고 flonicamid WG 등 총 4종의 약제가 추천농도에서 각각 92.8, 86.8, 97.7, 94.7%의 높은 살충효과를 보였다. 살충효과가 우수한 이들 4종 약제로 야외방제효과를 조사한 결과 약제 처리 후 5일차에서 모두 90%이상의 높은 방제가를 나타내었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abbott, W. S. (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 18:265-267.
  2. Burts, E. C., H. E. van de Baan and B. A. Croft (1989) Pyrethroid resistance in pear psylla, Psylla pyricola Foerster (Homoptera: Psyllidae), and synergism of pyrethroids with piperonyl butoxide. Can. Ent. 121:219-223. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent121219-3
  3. Diane, A. and M. Marion (2007) Pear psylla (Cacopsylla pyricola). Utah Pests. Utah State University. United States.
  4. EPPO/CABI (1996) Pear decline phytoplasme. In: Quarantine pests for Europe, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford(GB).
  5. Follett, P. A., B. A. Croft and P. H. Westigard (1985) Regional resistance to insecticides in Psylla pyricola from pear orchards in oregon. Can. Ent. 117:565-573. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent117565-5
  6. KCPA (2012) User's manual of pesticides. Korea Crop Protection Association.
  7. Kim, D. S., M. R. Cho and H. Y. Jeon (2000) Population trends and temperature-dependent development of pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola (Foerster) (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 39:73-82.
  8. Pree, D. J., D. E. Archibald, K. W. Ker and K. J. Cole (1990) Occurrence of pyrethroid resistance in pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae) populations from southern Ontario. J. Econ. Entomol. 77:1489-1494.
  9. Song, J. H. and H. H. Kyeong (2002) Current status of pesticide applications in pear orchards. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 20(Suppl. ). 95-95.

Cited by

  1. 꼬마배나무이 월동성충 산란 알의 부화 및 유기농업자재에 의한 방제효과 vol.22, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.11625/kjoa.2014.22.3.445
  2. DNA barcoding of pear psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea: Psyllidae), a tale of continued misidentifications vol.110, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007485320000012
  3. Residues Analysis of Acetamiprid, Boscalid, Imidacloprid and Pyraclostrobin in the Minor Crop Mustard Green under Greenhouse Conditions for Evaluation of their Potentiality of PLS Violation vol.39, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5338/kjea.2020.39.3.25