DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

건설 사업관리 시장의 경쟁 구조분석

An Analysis of the Competitive Structure of the Construction Management Market

  • Youn, Ha-Jung (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Yoon-Sun (School of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Jun (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2012.12.10
  • 심사 : 2013.01.28
  • 발행 : 2013.04.20

초록

최근 국내 CM(건설사업관리) 시장의 규모는 전년도 대비 미비한 성장 추세를 보이고 있다. 반면 CM시장에 참여하기 시작한 국내 기업들은 급격히 늘어나고 있어 본 연구에서는 CM시장의 경쟁 구조를 분석하기 위해 시장집중도 및 DEA 모형의 Malmquist 생산성을 분석하였다. 그 결과, CM시장은 소수 기업에 의해 독과 점유되고 있으나 점차 완화될 것으로 나타났으며, CM시장과 기업은 생산적이지 못하지만 점차 생산성 지수가 상향되고 있다고 나타났다. 이를 통해, 본 연구는 CM시장의 이해관계자들에게 CM시장의 경쟁 흐름을 이해할 수 있는 방향 지표를 제공함으로써 시사점을 제공하고자 하였다.

Recently there has been insignificant growth in the Korean construction management (CM) market, in comparison to the previous year. However, despite stagnation or even decreasing growth trends, the number of domestic companies participating in the CM market has increased rapidly. As follows, market movements of CM despite trending in stagnant growth or decrease, the market has been increasing firms which entry the market. The reasons for such dynamic change must be examined first, in order to facilitate analysis of its competitive structure. This study aims to examine the market competition structure and analyze the reason for proliferation of companies in the sick CM market. This study employs market concentration ratio and DEA-based Malmquist productivity indices to analyze the competitive structure of the CM market. Results reveal that the CM market has been monopolized by a few companies, but this is gradually changing. In addition, these companies were not productive, but there has been a gradual increase in the productivity index. Therefore, this study, which provides the direction index of the CM market, has implications for all major stakeholders in this market.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 2011 CM ability appraisal public announcement present condition data [Internet]. Seoul: Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2011-[cited 2012 Dec 1], Available from: http://www.mltm.go.kr/USR/NEWS/ m_71/lst.jsp.
  2. Lee JK, Hong SH, Park SK. Professional construction market structure analysis. Seoul (Korea): Korean research institute for construction policy. 2007 Jul. 63p. Report No.: Working Paper, No. 1.
  3. Yun JY. A study on the international competitiveness of Korean plant industries [Master's thesis]. Jeollabuk-do (Korea): Chonbuk National University; 2011. 124 p.
  4. Moon H, Lee YS, Kim JJ. A Study on the Polarization in the Construction Industry through the Investigation about Perception of General and Prime Contractors. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2006 Oct;22(10):147-54.
  5. Lee ED, Kim HS. Analysis of Construction Management Business Survey Index. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2011 May;12(3):83-90. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2011.12.3.83
  6. The construction industry knowledge information system [Internet]. Seoul: Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2000 - [cited 2012 Dec 1], Available from: http://www.kiscon.net/.
  7. Financial Supervisory Service [Internet]. Seoul: The Financial Supervisory Service, 2000 - [cited 2012 Dec 1], Available from: http://www.fss.or.kr/.
  8. Kim CK. The Study of Enhancing Market-Share and Developing Future Strategy for the Small and Mid-sized CM Firms. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2011 May;27(5):127-34.
  9. Kim YW. The Effects of Regulations on Construction Management Market [Master's thesis]. [Daejeon (Korea)]: Hanbat university; 2010. 74 p.
  10. Kim SK. A Model of the Strategic Coordination System between CM companies for Continuous Improvement of the Domestic CM Market. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2006 Dec;22(12):139-46.
  11. Yang KM. A Study on a job preference Analysis of Domestic Using Innovation Decision Making. Journal of the Korea Safety Management and Science. 2009 Sep;11(3):11-8.
  12. Park MH. An Analysis on the Efficiency and Productivity. 1st rev. ed, Gyeonggi-do: Korean Studies Information Co. Ltd. 2008. 225 p.
  13. Kim MH. The impact of management strategy on the firm's performance foodservice business [Master's thesis]. [Gyeonggi-do (Korea)]: Kyonggi university; 2005. 63 p.
  14. Ham SW, Seo SH. A Study on the Change of the Concentration Rate and Share of Advertising Market in Korea. Social Science Research Review. 2011 May;27(4):343-70.
  15. Yun YG. A study on the corporate level strategy through the long-term market forecasting on the domestic civil projects : focused on the large sized construction firms [Master's thesis].[Seoul (Korea)]: Yonsei University; 2005. 116 p.
  16. Cho SI. An Empirical Study on the Efficiency of the Construction Industry [Master's thesis]. [Gwangju (Korea)]: Chosun university; 2008. 129 p.
  17. Park MH. Development of DEA Efficiency and Malmquist Productivity Analysis System. The journal of productivity. 2008 Jun;22(2):241-65.
  18. Lee DH, Kim SK, Shin DH. A Correlation Analysis between the Change of Managerial Environment and the Business Performance of Domestic Construction Firms. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2009 Feb;9(1):111-21. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2009.9.1.111
  19. Lee DH, Kim SH, Kwon GD, Kim MK, Kim SK. The Management Evaluation Key Performance Indicators of Korea Construction Firms. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2011 Feb;11(1):35-44. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2011.02.1.035
  20. Choi JS, Heo ST, Lee HM. Assessment of Equity Market Fesponses on the Construction Project Awards. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2010 Feb;10(1):221-8. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2010.10.1.221

피인용 문헌

  1. An Analysis of the Market Structure Change in Construction Management Industry - Based on Public Announcement Data of CM Capabilities, 2004~2012 - vol.30, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2014.30.7.89
  2. A Survey of DEA Applications in Measuring the Efficiency Performance of Construction Organizations vol.15, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2014.15.5.103