DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Tool for Wind Turbine Applications

  • Received : 2012.08.23
  • Accepted : 2013.02.28
  • Published : 2013.03.30

Abstract

The present work focuses on the unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelastic properties of a small-medium sized wind-turbine blade operating under ideal conditions. A tapered/twisted blade representative of commercial blades used in an experiment setup at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory is considered. The aerodynamic loads are computed using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) techniques. For this purpose, FLUENT$^{(R)}$, a commercial finite-volume code that solves the Navier-Stokes and the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations, is used. Turbulence effects in the 2D simulations are modeled using the Wilcox k-w model for validation of the CFD approach. For the 3D aerodynamic simulations, in a first approximation, and considering that the intent is to present a methodology and workflow philosophy more than highly accurate turbulent simulations, the unsteady laminar Navier-Stokes equations were used to determine the unsteady loads acting on the blades. Five different blade pitch angles were considered and their aerodynamic performance compared. The structural dynamics of the flexible wind-turbine blade undergoing significant elastic displacements has been described by a nonlinear flap-lag-torsion slender-beam differential model. The aerodynamic quasi-steady forcing terms needed for the aeroelastic governing equations have been predicted through a strip-theory based on a simple 2D model, and the pertinent aerodynamic coefficients and the distribution over the blade span of the induced velocity derived using CFD. The resulting unsteady hub loads are achieved by a first space integration of the aeroelastic equations by applying the Galerkin's approach and by a time integration using a harmonic balance scheme. Comparison among two- and three- dimensional computations for the unsteady aerodynamic load, the flap, lag and torsional deflections, forces and moments are presented in the paper. Results, discussions and pertinent conclusions are outlined.

Keywords

References

  1. Burton, T., Sharpe, D., Jenkins, N., and Bossanyi, E., Wind Energy Handbook, 1st Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 2001, ISBN: 0-471-48997-2
  2. Manwell, J. F., McGowan, J.G., Rogers, A.L. "Wind Energy Explained", 1st edition, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 2002, ISBN 0-471-49972-2.
  3. Eggleston, D.M., Stoddard, F.S. "Wind Turbine Engineering Design", Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1987, p. 307.
  4. Germanischer Lloyd, Rules and regulations, VI - Nonmarine Technology, Part 1 - Wind Energy (Hamburg, 1993).
  5. L. Librescu, P. Marzocca, and W. A. Silva, "Aeroelasticity of 2-D lifting surfaces with time-delayed feedback control," Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2005, pp. 197-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2004.10.005
  6. A. Behal, V. M. Rao, P. Marzocca, and M. Kamaludeen, "Adaptive Control for a Nonlinear Wing Section with Multiple Flaps," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2006, pp. 744-748. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.18182
  7. Leishman, J.G., "Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics", 1st Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2000, ISBN 0-521- 52396-6.
  8. Leishman, J. G., "Challenges in modeling the Unsteady Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines,", AIAA 2002-0037, 21st ASME Wind Energy Symposium and 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NY, 2002.
  9. Politis, E.S., Nikolaou, I.G., Chaviaropoulos, P.K., Bertagnolio, F., Sorensen, N.N., and Johansen, J., "KNOWBLADE Task-4 report; Navier-Stokes Aeroelasticity", Riso-R-1492 (EN), Riso National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, 2005.
  10. Wilcox, D.C., "Turbulence Modeling for CFD", DCW Industries, Inc., La Canada, California, 1998.
  11. Hodges, D. H., and Dowell, E. H., "Nonlinear Equation for the Elastic Bending and Torsion of Twisted Non Uniform Rotor Blades," NASA TN D-7818, 1974.
  12. Greenberg, J.M., "Airfoil in Sinusoidal Motion in a Pulsating Stream," NACA TN-1326, 1947.
  13. Theodorsen, T., "General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter," NACA Report No.496, 1935.
  14. Fluent, Inc., FLUENT User Guide, September 29, 2006.
  15. Stepniewski, W.Z., Keys, C.N. "Rotary - Wing Aerodynamics", Dover Publications, Inc. , New York, 1984.
  16. Johnson, W., "Helicopter Theory", Dover Publications, 1980.
  17. Giguere, P., and Selig, M. S., "Design of a Tapered and Twisted Blade for the NREL Combined Experiment Rotor", NREL/SR-500-26173, Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1999.
  18. Butterfield, C.P., Musial, W.P., Simms, D.A., "Combined Experiment Phase I Final Report", NREL/TP-257-4655, 1992, Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
  19. Hodges, D.H., and Ormiston R.A., "Stability of Elastic Bending and Torsion of Uniform Cantilever Rotor Blades in Hover with Variable Structural Coupling," NASA TN D-8192, 1976.
  20. Friedmann, P.P., "Helicopter Rotor Dynamics and Aeroelasticity: Some Key Ideas and Insights," Vertica, Vol.14, No.1, pp.101-121, 1990.
  21. Somers, D. M., "Design and Experimental Results for the S809 Airfoil,", Technical Report, Airfoils, Inc., State College, PA, 1989.
  22. Wolfe, W.P., Ochs, S.S., "CFD Calculations of S809 Aerodynamic Characteristics", AIAA Paper 97-0973, 1997.
  23. Bramwell, A.R.S., "Helicopter Dynamics", Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, June 1, 1976.
  24. Bir, G.S., "Structural Dynamics Verification of Rotorcraft Comprehensive Analysis System (RCAS)", NREL/TP-500-35328, 2005, Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
  25. Bielawa, R.L., "Rotary Wing Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity," AIAA Education Series, AIAA, 1992.
  26. Coppotelli, G., and Cellini, F., "A Rotorcraft Trim Procedure for the Prediction of Fuselage Vibrations," Advances in Engineering Research, Vol. 4, Nova Science Publisher, NY, USA, pp. 235-257. ISBN: 9781621006954
  27. Balis Crema L., Coppotelli, G., and Grappasonni, C., "On the Effects of Structural Modifications in the Large Wind Turbine Dynamics," Proceedings of the 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Denver (CO) - USA, Denver (Co) - USA, 2011.