대한산업공학회지 (Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)

  • 제39권2호
  • /
  • Pages.109-118
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1225-0988(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6457(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

비정규 오차를 고려한 자기회귀모형의 추정법 및 예측성능에 관한 연구

A Study of Estimation Method for Auto-Regressive Model with Non-Normal Error and Its Prediction Accuracy

  • 임보미 (고려대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 박정술 (고려대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 김준석 (고려대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 김성식 (고려대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 백준걸 (고려대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Lim, Bo Mi (School of Industrial Management Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Cheong-Sool (School of Industrial Management Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Jun Seok (School of Industrial Management Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Shick (School of Industrial Management Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Baek, Jun-Geol (School of Industrial Management Engineering, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2013.01.31
  • 심사 : 2013.03.06
  • 발행 : 2013.04.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

We propose a method for estimating coefficients of AR (autoregressive) model which named MLPAR (Maximum Likelihood of Pearson system for Auto-Regressive model). In the present method for estimating coefficients of AR model, there is an assumption that residual or error term of the model follows the normal distribution. In common cases, we can observe that the error of AR model does not follow the normal distribution. So the normal assumption will cause decreasing prediction accuracy of AR model. In the paper, we propose the MLPAR which does not assume the normal distribution of error term. The MLPAR estimates coefficients of auto-regressive model and distribution moments of residual by using pearson distribution system and maximum likelihood estimation. Comparing proposed method to auto-regressive model, results are shown to verify improved performance of the MLPAR in terms of prediction accuracy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Akaike, H. (1969), Power spectrum estimation through autoregressive model fitting, Annals of the institute of statistical mathematics, 21, 407-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02532269
  2. Akaike, H. (1974), A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification, IEEE Transactions on automatic control, 19(6), 716-723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
  3. Aldrich, J. (1997), R. A. Fisher and the making of Maximum Likelihood 1912 -1922, Statistical Science, 12(3), 162-176. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1030037906
  4. Bowerman, B. L., O'Connellm R., and Koehler, A. (2005), Forecasting Time Series and Regression, 4th edition, Thomson Brooks/Cole, CA, USA.
  5. Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., and Reinsel, G. C. (1994), Time Series Analysis : Forecasting and Control, 3rd edition, Prentice-Hall, NJ, USA.
  6. Elderton, W. P. and Johnson, N. L. (2009), Systems of frequency curves, Cambridge University Press, NY, USA.
  7. Endo, H. and Randall R. B. (2007), Enhancement of autoregressive model based gear tooth fault detection technique by the use of minimum entropy deconvolution filter, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(2), 906-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.02.005
  8. Gay, D. M. (1983), Algorithm 611. Subroutines for Unconstrained Minimization Using a Model.Trust, ACM Transcations on Mathematical Software, 9(4), 503-524. https://doi.org/10.1145/356056.356066
  9. Gay, D. M. (1990), Usage Summary for Selected Optimization Routines, Computing Sicience Technical Report, AT&T Bell Laboratories, NJ, USA.
  10. Last, M., Klein, Y., and Kandel, A. (2001), Knowledge Discovery in Time Series Databases, IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and cybernetices- part B : cybernetics, 31(1), 160-169. https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.907576
  11. Nagahara, Y. (2000), Non-Gaussian Filter and Smoother Based on the Pearson Distribution System, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 24(6), 721-738.
  12. Nagahara, Y. (2004), A method of simulating multivariate nonnormal distributions by the Pearson distribution system and estimation, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 47(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2003.10.008
  13. Pankratz, A. (2008), Forecasting with Univariate Box-Jenkins Models : Concepts and Cases, John wiley and sons, NY, USA.
  14. Parrish, R. S. (1983), On an integrated approach to member selection and parameter estimation for Pearson distributions, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 1, 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(83)90098-1
  15. Pearson, K. (1895), Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Evolution. II. Skew Variation in Homogeneous Material, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 186, 343-414. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1895.0010
  16. Pearson, K. (1916), Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution. XIX. Second Supplement to a Memoiron Skew Variation, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Containing Papersof a Mathematical or Physical Character, 216, 429-457. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1916.0009
  17. Rydberg, T. H. (2000), Realistic Statistical Modelling of Financial Data, International Statistical Review, 68(3), 233-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2000.tb00329.x
  18. Sethi, S. and Sorger G. (1991), A Theory of Rolling Horizon Decision Making, Annuals of Operations Research, 29, 387-416 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283607
  19. Walpole, R. E. Myers, R. H. Myers, S. L., and Ye, K. (2006), Probability and Statistics for engineerings and scientists, 9 edition, Prentice Hall, NJ, USA.