Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제14권4호
  • /
  • Pages.568-575
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Clinical Utility of a Adding Lateral Approach to Conventional Vertical Approach for Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy

  • Myong, Joo Hwa (Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kang, Bong Joo (Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Yoon, Soo Kyung (Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Sung Hun (Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • An, Yeong Yi (Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 투고 : 2012.09.20
  • 심사 : 2013.04.18
  • 발행 : 2013.07.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical utility of adding lateral approach to conventional vertical approach for prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies. Materials and Methods: From April 2010 to May 2012, 130 vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsies were attempted in 127 patients. While a vertical approach was preferred, a lateral approach was used if the vertical approach failed. The success rate of biopsies utilizing only a vertical approach was compared with that using both vertical and lateral approaches and the breast thickness for both procedures was measured and compared with that for vertical approach. In addition, pathology results were evaluated and the causes of the failed biopsies were analyzed. Results: Of the 130 cases, 127 biopsies were performed and 3 biopsies failed. The success rate of the vertical approach was 83.8% (109/130); however, when the lateral approach was also used, the success rate increased to 97.7% (127/130) (p = 0.0004). The mean breast thickness was 2.7 ${\pm}$ 1 cm for the lateral approach and 4 ${\pm}$ 1.2 cm for the vertical approach (p < 0.0001). The histopathologic results in 76 (59.8%) of the biopsies were benign, 23 (18.1%) were high-risk lesions, and 28 (22.0%) were malignant. The causes of biopsy failure were thin breasts (n = 2) and undetected difficult lesion location (n = 1). Conclusion: The addition of lateral approach to conventional vertical approach in prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy improved the success rate of stereotactic biopsy, especially in patients with thin breasts.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Berg WA, Krebs TL, Campassi C, Magder LS, Sun CC. Evaluation of 14- and 11-gauge directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy probes and 14-gauge biopsy guns in a breast parenchymal model. Radiology 1997;205:203-208 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.205.1.9314986
  2. Elvecrog EL, Lechner MC, Nelson MT. Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology 1993;188:453-455 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327696
  3. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated largecore biopsies. Radiology 1991;180:403-407 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.180.2.1648757
  4. Reynolds HE, Poon CM, Goulet RJ, Lazaridis CL. Biopsy of breast microcalcifications using an 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted device. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:611-613 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.171.3.9725283
  5. Nakamura Y, Urashima M, Matsuura A, Nishihara R, Itoh A, Kagemoto M, et al. Stereotactic directional vacuumassisted breast biopsy using lateral approach. Breast Cancer 2010;17:286-289 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-009-0162-4
  6. Han BK, Choe YH, Ko YH, Nam SJ, Kim JH, Yang JH. Stereotactic core-needle biopsy of non-mass calcifications: outcome and accuracy at long-term follow-up. Korean J Radiol 2003;4:217-223 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2003.4.4.217
  7. Lehman CD, Sieler-Gutierrez HJ, Georgian-Smith D. Lateral approach biopsy adapter: accuracy on an upright unit in a turkey breast model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:897-899 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.177.4.1770897
  8. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2004
  9. Stomper PC, Connolly JL, Meyer JE, Harris JR. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1989;172:235-241 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.172.1.2544922
  10. Spencer NJ, Evans AJ, Galea M, Sibbering DM, Yeoman LJ, Pinder SE, et al. Pathological-radiological correlations in benign lesions excised during a breast screening programme. Clin Radiol 1994;49:853-856 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(05)82874-0
  11. Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:941-948 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.4.1800941
  12. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA Jr. Stereotactic histologic biopsy with patients prone: technical feasibility in 98% of mammographically detected lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:785-794 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.3.1800785
  13. Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Carter D, Lange RC, Lee CH. Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11-gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:683-687 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.172.3.10063860
  14. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, Evans WP 3rd, Lechner MC, Richardson TR, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001;218:497-502 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.2.r01fe35497
  15. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, Kaelin C, DiPiro PJ, Denison CM, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 1999;281:1638-1641 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.17.1638
  16. Kim HS, Kim MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Son EJ, Oh KK. US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications in breast lesions and long-term follow-up results. Korean J Radiol 2008;9:503-509 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.6.503
  17. Welle GJ, Clark M, Loos S, Pauls D, Warden D, Sheffield M, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy: recumbent biopsy using add-on upright equipment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:59-63 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750059
  18. Kettritz U, Morack G, Decker T. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations. Eur J Radiol 2005;55:270-276 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.10.014
  19. Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Ko KH, Kwak JY, Son EJ, et al. Concordant or discordant? Imaging-pathology correlation in a sonography-guided core needle biopsy of a breast lesion. Korean J Radiol 2011;12:232-240 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2011.12.2.232

피인용 문헌

  1. The lateral arm device for mammographic breast procedures: overview of its uses, safety, and efficacy vol.18, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2021.1908884
  2. Does lateral arm technique decrease the rate of clip migration in stereotactic and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies? vol.12, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01136-w