DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimum Harvest Stage of Italian Ryegrass 'Kowinearly' According to One and Two Harvests During Spring Season

이탈리안 라이그라스 '코윈어리'의 봄철 1회 및 2회 이용에 따른 수확적기 구명

  • 서성 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김맹중 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김원호 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 이상학 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 정민웅 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김기용 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 지희정 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 박형수 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김종근 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 최기준 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원)
  • Received : 2013.01.05
  • Accepted : 2013.01.29
  • Published : 2013.03.31

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the optimum harvest stage of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam., IRG) for maximum forage production during the spring season in Suwon, 2010. The variety of IRG was the early maturity type, 'Kowinearly', and six harvest stages (treatments) were first heading (T1), heading (T2), late heading to early bloom (T3), bloom to late bloom (T4), ripeness (T5), and late ripeness stage (T6). The dates of the first heading and heading of 'Kowinearly' were seen on 4 to 5 May, and 14 May, respectively. Plant length and dry matter (DM) percentage at first harvest were from 69 cm and 14.8% at T1 stage to 103 cm and 35.0% at T6 stage, respectively. The content of crude protein (CP) and in vitro DM digestibility (IVDMD) of T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 at first harvest were 15.6%, 10.6%, 10.1%, 8.1%, 7.3% and 5.4%, and 81.8%, 72.1%, 64.8%, 63.8%, 61.4% and 59.0%, respectively. The content of neural detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were increased continuously with delayed harvest. A significantly higher yield of DM, CP and in vitro digestible DM (IVDDM) were observed for T3, and T4 (p<0.05). DM yield of 3,526 kg, 6,278 kg, 7,842 kg, 8,984 kg, 8,346 kg and 8,008 kg/ha, CP yield of 549 kg, 665 kg, 795 kg, 725 kg, 608 kg and 430 kg/ha, and IVDDM of 2,883 kg. 4,526 kg, 5,083 kg, 5,728 kg, 5,124 kg and 4,722 kg/ha at first harvest were recorded in T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6, respectively. Regrowth yield of DM, CP and IVDDM were shown to be higher at T1 and T2 (p<0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between the two stages. Daily DM and DDM production of regrowth IRG were higher at T2, followed by T1. The total yield (at first and at regrowth) of DM, CP and IVDDM were significant higher for T2, followed by T3, T4 and T1 in order. At T2 stage, the yield was 11,089 kg, 1,254 kg, and 7,669 kg/ha in DM, CP, and IVDDM. In conclusion, the late heading to bloom stage was determined to be the optimum harvest stage for a single harvest, while the heading stage was a suitable stage of first harvest of 'Kowinearly' where two harvests were sought in a single year.

본 연구는 국내 개발 이탈리안 라이그라스 (IRG)의 봄철 1회 및 2회 이용 시 수확적기를 구명하고자 국립축산과학원(수원)에서 조생종 'Kowinearly' 품종을 공시, 2009년 9월 30일에 파종하여 2010년 6월까지 수행하였다. 처리내용은 1차 수확시기로 출수시(T1), 출수기(T2), 출수후기~개화초기(T3), 개화기~개화후기(T4), 등숙기(T5) 및 등숙후기(T6) 등 6처리였으며, 2차 수량조사는 6월 11일 동일하게 실시하였다. 'Kowinearly'의 출수시는 5월 4~5일, 출수기는 5월 14일, 도복은 개화 이후 많이 관찰되었다. 건물률은 T1 14.8%에서 T6 35.0%로 생육진행에 따라 높아졌으며, 조단백질, RFV, 건물 소화율 등 사료가치는 생육 지연에 따라 낮아졌다. 건물수량과 가소화 건물수량은 T4에서 ha당 각각 8,984 kg과 5,728 kg으로, 조단백질 수량은 T3에서 795 kg으로 유의적으로 높았으며 (p<0.05), 재생초의 건물수량, 조단백질 수량, 가소화 건물수량은 T1과 T2에서 차이 없이 각각 5,425 kg, 596 kg, 3,204 kg(T1)과 4,811 kg, 589 kg, 3,143 kg (T2)으로 유의적으로 높았다 (p<0.05). 총 건물수량, 조단백질 수량, 가소화 건물수량은 T2 와 T3에서 차이 없이 각각 11,089 kg, 1,254 kg, 7,669 kg(T2)과 10,354 kg, 1,225 kg, 6,915 kg (T3)으로 유의적으로 높았다 (p<0.05). 일당 건물생산량과 일당 가소화건물생산량은 1차 생육은 T2, T3, T4에서, 재생초는 T2, T1에서 높았으며, 전 기간 일당생산량에서는 출수기인 T2에서 가장 높았고 다음이 T3, T4, T1 순이었다. 이상의 결과를 종합하여 볼 때, IRG 'Kowinearly'를 봄철에 1회 수확하여 이용할 경우 단위면적당 생산량과 사료가치를 고려한 수확적기는 출수후기~개화기이며, 봄철 2회 수확하여 이용할 경우 재생과 단위면적당 총 생산량을 고려한 1차 수확적기는 출수기가 유리하다고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis (15th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.
  2. Choi, G.J., Kim, W.H. and Seo, S. 2008. Production and utilization of Italian ryegrass and barley as winter annual forages in Korea. Proceedings of 2008 Annual Congress of Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. pp. 17-48.
  3. Choi, G.J., Lim, Y.C., Ji, H.J., Lee, S.H., Lee, K.W., Kim, D.K., Seo, S. and Kim, K.Y. 2011. Change in dry matter yields and feed values of Italian ryegrass, Hwasan 101, at different growth stages. Journal of the Korean Grassland and Forage Science. 31:107-112. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2011.31.2.107
  4. Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 379, USDA. Washington, DC.
  5. Holland, C., Kezar, W., Kautz, W.P., Lazowski, E.J., Mahanna, W.C. and Reinhart, R. 1990. The Pioneer Forage Manual-A Nutritional Guide. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Des Moines, Iowa, USA.
  6. Kim, D.A. 1983. Forage crops. Seonjin Publish Company. Seoul. pp. 309-320.
  7. MIFAFF. 2011. Forage production and utilization for animal production. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forest and Fisheries.
  8. Moore, R.E. 1970. Procedure for the two-stage in vitro digestion of forage. University of Florida, Department of Animal Science.
  9. RDA. 2003. Investigation and Analysis of Research and Technology in Agriculture (Forages). Rural Development Administration.
  10. RDA. 2011. Forages. Standard Agriculture Farming Text-91. Rural Development Administration. pp. 69-78.
  11. SAS. 2000. SAS User's Guide. Version 8.01. SAS Institute Inc., Cary North Caroline, USA.
  12. Seo, S. 2008. Development and utilization of domestic forage resources. Proceedings of 2008 Annual Congress of Korean Society of the Animal Science and Technology (Vol. 1) pp. 99-114.
  13. Seo, S. 2009. Development of new varieties and production of forages in Korea. Journal of the Korean Grassland and Forage Science. 29:1-10. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.1.001
  14. Seo, S., Kim, W.H., Kim, K.Y., Jung, M.W., Choi, G.J., Park, H.S. and Lee, J.K. 2011. Effect of early harvest on the forage yield, quality and regrowth of Italian ryegrass and barley sown in early spring. Journal of the Korean Grassland and Forage Science. 31:39-46. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2011.31.1.39
  15. Tilley, J.M.A. and Terry, R.A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18:104-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x

Cited by

  1. Effects of Seeding Dates on Yield and Feed Value of Italian Ryegrass in Paddy Field Cultivation vol.33, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2013.33.3.185
  2. Crop Analysis through Growth Survey after Wintering of Winter Annual Forages Grown from 2014 to 2015 vol.35, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2015.35.4.309
  3. Effect of Difference in Cold-tolerance of Variety on Forage Productivity of Italian Ryegrass in Middle Regions of Korea vol.38, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2018.38.4.210
  4. Impact of Different Environmental Conditions and Production Techniques on Forage Productivity of Italian Ryegrass in Central and Southern Regions of Korea vol.38, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2018.38.4.231