DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An inertia-type hybrid mount combining a rubber mount and a piezostack actuator for naval shipboard equipment

  • Published : 2013.03.31

Abstract

This paper has been focused on developing a new hybrid mount for shipboard equipment used in naval surface ships and submarines. While the hybrid mount studied in our previous research was 100 kg-class series-type mount, the new hybrid mount has been designed as an inertia-type mount capable of supporting a static of 500 kg. The proposed mount consists of a commercial rubber resilient mount, a piezostack actuator and an inertial mass. The piezostack actuator connected with the inertial mass generates actively the control force. The performances of the proposed mount with a newly designed specific controller have been evaluated in accordance with US military specifications and compared with the passive mount. An isolation system consisting of four proposed mounts and auxiliary devices has been also tested. Through a series of experimental tests, it has been confirmed that the proposed mount provides better performance than the US Navy's standard passive mounts.

Keywords

References

  1. Benassi, L. and Elliott, S.J., 2005. Global control of a vibrating plate using a feedback-controlled inertial actuator. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 283(1-2), pp.69-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.03.039
  2. Burdisso, R.A. and Heilmann, J.D., 1998. A new dual-reaction mass dynamic vibration absorber actuator for active vibration control. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 214(5), pp.817-831. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1998.1552
  3. Choi, S.B., Hong, S.R. and Kim, S.H., 2004. Beam vibration control via rubber and piezostack mounts: experimental work. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 273(4-5), pp.1079-1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2003.09.006
  4. Hakansson, L., Clasesson, I. and Sturesson, P.-O., 1998. Adaptive feedback control of machine-tool vibration based on the filtered-X LMS algorithm. International Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 17(4), pp. 199-213.
  5. Howard, C.Q., Snyder, S.D. and Hansen, C.H., 2000. Calculation of vibratory power transmission for use in active vibration control. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 233(4), pp.569-581. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2814
  6. Huang, X., Elliot, S.J. and Brennan, M.J., 2003 Active isolation of a flexible structure from base vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 263(2), pp.357-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01057-X
  7. Ichchou, M.N., Jemai, B., Bellon, L. and Jezeguel, L., 2001. Active rubber mount by means of piezoelectric actuators, experimental work. Smart Materials and Structures, 10(5), pp.1095-1099. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/10/5/401
  8. Kamada, T., Fujita, T., Hatayama, T., Arikabe, T., Murai, N., Aizawa, S. and Tohyma, K., 1997. Active vibration control of frame structures with smart structures using piezoelectric actuators (vibration control by control of bending moments of columns). Smart Materials and Structures, 6(4), pp.448-456. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/6/4/009
  9. Lee, B.H. and Lee, C.W., 2009. Model based feed-forward control of electromagnetic type active control engine-mount system. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 323(3-5), pp.574-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2009.01.033
  10. Military Specification MIL-M-17185A(SHIPS), 1956. Mounts, resilient; general specifications and tests for (shipboard application). Department of the Navy, Washington D.C., USA.
  11. Military Specification MIL-M-17508F(SH), 1990. Mounts, resilient: Types 6E100, 6E150, 7E450, 6E900, 6E2000, 5E3500, 6E100BB, 6E150BB, 7E450BB, and 6E900BB. Department of the Navy, Washington D.C., USA.
  12. Military Specification MIL-S-901D(NAVY), 1989. Shock tests, H. I. (High-Impact) shipboard machinery, equipment, and systems, requirements for. Department of the Navy, Washington D.C., USA.
  13. Military Specification MIL-STD-167-1A, 2005. Mechanical vibrations of shipboard equipment. Department of Defense, Washington D.C., USA.
  14. Military Specification MIL-STD-461E, 1999. Requirements for the control of electromagnetic interference characteristics of subsystems and equipment. Department of Defense, Washington D.C., USA.
  15. Moon, S.J., Kwak, J.S., Chung, J.H., Ji, Y.J., Yoon, J.S., Choi, S.B., Lee, H.Y., Jung, W.J. and Ki, D.J., 2010. A study on the hybrid mount against vibration and shock for naval ships. Shock and Vibration, 17(3), pp.269-284. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/390453
  16. Nguyen, V.Q., Choi, S.M., Han, Y.M., Choi, S.B. and Moon, S.J., 2008. Design of piezostack-based active mount and application to vibration control system. Smart Materials and Structures, 17(6), pp.1-9.
  17. Nguyen, V.Q., Choi, S.M., Choi, S.B. and Moon, S.J., 2009. Sliding mode control of a vibrating system using a hybrid active mount. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 223, pp.1327-1337. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544062JMES1269
  18. Piezomechaniks GmbH. [online] Available at: [Accessed July 2011].
  19. Super Century. [online] Available at: [Accessed July 2011].
  20. Turnip, A., Hong, K.S. and Park, S.H., 2009. Modeling of a hydraulic engine mount for active pneumatic engine vibration control using the extended Kalman filter. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 23(1), pp.229-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-008-1105-2
  21. Widrow, B. and Stearns, S.D., 1985. Adaptive signal processing. Prentice-Hall.
  22. Yang, J., Suematsu, Y. and Kang, Z., 2001. Two-degree-of-freedom controller to reduce the vibration of vehicle enginebody system. IEEE Transactions on Control System and Technology, 9(2), pp.295-304. https://doi.org/10.1109/87.911381

Cited by

  1. New Mount with Moving-Coil-Type Electromagnetic Actuator for Naval Shipboard Equipment vol.23, pp.10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5050/KSNVE.2013.23.10.885