DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of the quality of life in maxillectomy patients: A longitudinal study

  • Kumar, Pradeep (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Material Sciences, King George Medical University) ;
  • Alvi, Habib Ahmad (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Material Sciences, King George Medical University) ;
  • Rao, Jitendra (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Material Sciences, King George Medical University) ;
  • Singh, Balendra Pratap (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Material Sciences, King George Medical University) ;
  • Jurel, Sunit Kumar (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Material Sciences, King George Medical University) ;
  • Kumar, Lakshya (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Material Sciences, King George Medical University) ;
  • Aggarwal, Himanshi (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Material Sciences, King George Medical University)
  • 투고 : 2012.08.17
  • 심사 : 2012.11.13
  • 발행 : 2013.02.28

초록

PURPOSE. To longitudinally assess the quality of life in maxillectomy patients rehabilitated with obturator prosthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-six subjects were enrolled in the span of 16 months, out of which six were dropouts. Subjects (age group 20-60 years) with maxillary defects, irrespective of the cause, planned for definite obturator prosthesis, were recruited. The Hindi version of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Head and Neck version 1 of Quality of Life Questionnaire was used before surgical intervention and one month after definitive obturator. Questionnaire includes 35 questions related to the patient's physical health, well being, psychological status, social relation and environmental conditions. The data were processed with statistical package for social science (SPSS). Probability level of P<.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS. The quality of life after rehabilitation with obturator prosthesis was 81.48% (${\pm}13.64$) on average. On item-level, maximum mean scores were obtained for items problem with teeth ($1.87{\pm}0.94$), pain in mouth ($1.80{\pm}0.92$), trouble in eating ($1.70{\pm}0.88$), trouble in talking to other people ($1.60{\pm}1.22$), problems in swallowing solid food ($1.57{\pm}1.22$) and bothering appearance ($1.53{\pm}1.04$); while minimum scores were obtained for the items coughing ($1.17{\pm}0.38$), hoarseness of voice ($1.17{\pm}0.53$), painful throat ($1.13{\pm}0.43$), trouble in having social contacts with friends ($1.10{\pm}0.40$) and trouble having physical contacts with family or friends ($1.10{\pm}0.31$). CONCLUSION. Obturator prosthesis is a highly positive and non-invasive approach to improve the quality of life of patients with maxillectomy defects.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. What quality of life? The WHOQOL Group. World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment. World Health Forum 1996;17:354-6.
  2. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1403-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-K
  3. Felce D, Perry J. Quality of life: its definition and measurement. Res Dev Disabil 1995;16:51-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(94)00028-8
  4. Irish J, Sandhu N, Simpson C, Wood R, Gilbert R, Gullane P, Brown D, Goldstein D, Devins G, Barker E. Quality of life in patients with maxillectomy prostheses. Head Neck 2009;31:813-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21042
  5. Borlase G. Use of obturators in rehabilitation of maxillectomy defects. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg 2000;15:75-9.
  6. Kornblith AB, Zlotolow IM, Gooen J, Huryn JM, Lerner T, Strong EW, Shah JP, Spiro RH, Holland JC. Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck 1996;18:323-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199607/08)18:4<323::AID-HED3>3.0.CO;2-#
  7. Matsuyama M, Tsukiyama Y, Tomioka M, Koyano K. Clinical assessment of chewing function of obturator prosthesis wearers by objective measurement of masticatory performance and maximum occlusal force. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:253-7.
  8. Depprich RA, Handschel JG, Meyer U, Meissner G. Comparison of prevalence of microorganisms on titanium and silicone/polymethyl methacrylate obturators used for rehabilitation of maxillary defects. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99:400-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60089-X
  9. Martin JW, King GE, Kramer DC, Rambach SC. Use of an interim obturator for definitive prosthesis fabrication. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:527-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90308-1
  10. Wolfaardt JF. Modifying a surgical obturator prosthesis into an interim obturator prosthesis. A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:619-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90577-5
  11. McGrouther DA. Facial disfigurement. BMJ 1997;314:991. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.991
  12. Alvi A, Doherty T, Lewen G. Facial fractures and concomitant injuries in trauma patients. Laryngoscope 2003;113: 102-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200301000-00019
  13. Brasileiro BF, Passeri LA. Epidemiological analysis of maxillofacial fractures in Brazil: a 5-year prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102: 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.023
  14. Chaukar DA, Das AK, Deshpande MS, Pai PS, Pathak KA, Chaturvedi P, Kakade AC, Hawaldar RW, D'Cruz AK. Quality of life of head and neck cancer patient: validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30 and European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-H&N 35 in Indian patients. Indian J Cancer 2005;42:178-84.
  15. Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I: classification. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:554-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(78)90092-6
  16. Rieger JM, Wolfaardt JF, Jha N, Seikaly H. Maxillary obturators: the relationship between patient satisfaction and speech outcome. Head Neck 2003;25:895-903. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.10299
  17. Hertrampf K, Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM, Lorenz W, Koller M. Quality of life of patients with maxillofacial defects after treatment for malignancy. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17: 657-65.
  18. Koyama S, Sasaki K, Inai T, Watanabe M. Effects of defect configuration, size, and remaining teeth on masticatory function in post-maxillectomy patients. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:635-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01483.x
  19. Landes CA. Zygoma implant-supported midfacial prosthetic rehabilitation: a 4-year follow-up study including assessment of quality of life. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16: 313-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01096.x
  20. Lethaus B, Lie N, de Beer F, Kessler P, de Baat C, Verdonck HW. Surgical and prosthetic reconsiderations in patients with maxillectomy. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:138-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02031.x
  21. Depprich R, Naujoks C, Lind D, Ommerborn M, Meyer U, Kübler NR, Handschel J. Evaluation of the quality of life of patients with maxillofacial defects after prosthodontic therapy with obturator prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:71-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.09.019
  22. Rogers SN, Lowe D, McNally D, Brown JS, Vaughan ED. Health-related quality of life after maxillectomy: a comparison between prosthetic obturation and free flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:174-81. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2003.50044
  23. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, Kasa S, Klee M, Osoba D, Razavi D, Rolfe PB, Schraub S, Sneeuw K, Sullivan M, Takeda F. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85: 365-76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.5.365
  24. Bjordal K, de Graeff A, Fayers PM, Hammerlid E, van Pottelsberghe C, Curran D, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Maher EJ, Meyza JW, Brédart A, Söderholm AL, Arraras JJ, Feine JS, Abendstein H, Morton RP, Pignon T, Huguenin P, Bottomly A, Kaasa S. A 12 country field study of the EORTC QLQ- C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) in head and neck patients. EORTC Quality of Life Group. Eur J Cancer 2000;36:1796-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00186-6
  25. Fayers PM. Interpreting quality of life data: populationbased reference data for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:1331-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00127-7
  26. Schwarz R, Hinz A. Reference data for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general German population. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:1345-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00447-0
  27. Kornblith AB, Anderson J, Cella DF, Tross S, Zuckerman E, Cherin E, Henderson E, Weiss RB, Cooper MR, Silver RT. Hodgkin disease survivors at increased risk for problems in psychosocial adaptation. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Cancer 1992;70:2214-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19921015)70:8<2214::AID-CNCR2820700833>3.0.CO;2-X
  28. Gurland B. Epidemiology of psychiatric disorders. In: Sadavoy J, Lazarus LW, Jarwik LF, eds: Comprehensive review of geriatric psychiatry. Washington DC; American Psychiatric Press; 1991. p. 25-40.

피인용 문헌

  1. Body Image: a Critical Psychosocial Issue for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer vol.17, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-014-0422-0
  2. Reconstruction of the Maxillectomy Defect vol.4, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-016-0130-4
  3. Creating a digitized database of maxillofacial prostheses (obturators): A pilot study vol.8, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.219
  4. Assessment of the quality of life of the patients with treated oral cancer in Iran vol.21, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0651-0
  5. Prosthetic versus surgical rehabilitation in patients with maxillary defect regarding the quality of life: systematic review vol.22, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-018-0679-9
  6. Quality of life and problems associated with obturators of patients with maxillectomies vol.14, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-017-0160-2
  7. Validation of the Turkish version of the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire version 3 (LORQv3) in prosthetically rehabilitated patients with head and neck cancer vol.14, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-129
  8. Understandability of Speech Predicts Quality of Life Among Maxillectomy Patients Restored With Obturator Prosthesis vol.73, pp.10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.04.031
  9. A Palatal Speech Bulb-A Case Study vol.2, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/reports2010005
  10. Impact of Oral Rehabilitation on Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Study of 100 Patients with Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire and the Oral Health Impact Profile vol.72, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-020-01801-4
  11. Application of 3D printing technology for rehabilitating maxillary defects vol.58, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.4.349
  12. Obturator Prosthesis Rehabilitation after Maxillectomy: Functional and Aesthetical Analysis in 25 Patients vol.18, pp.23, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312524