DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison between preoperative and postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: an institutional analysis

  • Lee, Jeong Won (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jong Hoon (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jun-Gi (Department of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Seong Taek (Department of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Hyuk Jun (Department of Colorectal Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Myung Ah (Department of Medical Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Chun, Hoo Geun (Department of Medical Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Jeong, Song Mi (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon, Sei Chul (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Jang, Hong Seok (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2013.06.10
  • Accepted : 2013.09.06
  • Published : 2013.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the treatment outcomes of preoperative versus postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on locally advanced rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: Medical data of 114 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with CRT preoperatively (54 patients) or postoperatively (60 patients) from June 2003 to April 2011 was analyzed retrospectively. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) or a precursor of 5-FU-based concurrent CRT (median, 50.4 Gy) and total mesorectal excision were conducted for all patients. The median follow-up duration was 43 months (range, 16 to 118 months). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary end points were overall survival (OS), locoregional control, toxicity, and sphincter preservation rate. Results: The 5-year DFS rate was 72.1% and 48.6% for the preoperative and postoperative CRT group, respectively (p = 0.05, the univariate analysis; p = 0.10, the multivariate analysis). The 5-year OS rate was not significantly different between the groups (76.2% vs. 69.0%, p = 0.23). The 5-year locoregional control rate was 85.2% and 84.7% for the preoperative and postoperative CRT groups (p = 0.98). The sphincter preservation rate of low-lying tumor showed significant difference between both groups (58.1% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.02). Pathologic tumor and nodal down-classification occurred after the preoperative CRT (53.7% and 77.8%, both p < 0.001). Acute and chronic toxicities were not significantly different between both groups (p=0.10 and p = 0.62, respectively). Conclusion: The results confirm that preoperative CRT can be advantageous for improving down-classification rate and the sphincter preservation rate of low-lying tumor in rectal cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. Jung KW, Park S, Kong HJ, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2009. Cancer Res Treat 2012;44:11-24. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2012.44.1.11
  2. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Prolongation of the disease-free interval in surgically treated rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1465-72. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198506063122301
  3. Krook JE, Moertel CG, Gunderson LL, et al. Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991;324:709-15. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199103143241101
  4. Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O'Connell MJ, et al. Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5124-30. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467
  5. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1731-40. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040694
  6. Ruo L, Tickoo S, Klimstra DS, et al. Long-term prognostic significance of extent of rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy. Ann Surg 2002;236:75-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200207000-00012
  7. Capirci C, Valentini V, Cionini L, et al. Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term analysis of 566 ypCR patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;72:99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.019
  8. Rosenberg R, Nekarda H, Zimmermann F, et al. Histopathological response after preoperative radiochemotherapy in rectal carcinoma is associated with improved overall survival. J Surg Oncol 2008;97:8-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20844
  9. Rullier A, Laurent C, Capdepont M, et al. Impact of tumor response on survival after radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2010;34:562-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181d438b0
  10. Rodel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8688-96. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.02.1329
  11. Song JH, Jang HS, Kim YS, et al. The pathological and clinical effects of preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 2011;29:11-9. https://doi.org/10.3857/jkstro.2011.29.1.11
  12. Yoon MS, Nam TK, Kim HR, et al. Results of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of rectal cancer. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 2008;26:247-56. https://doi.org/10.3857/jkstro.2008.26.4.247
  13. Park JH, Yoon SM, Yu CS, et al. Randomized phase 3 trial comparing preoperative and postoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer. Cancer 2011;117:3703-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25943
  14. Chen ET, Mohiuddin M, Brodovsky H, Fishbein G, Marks G. Downstaging of advanced rectal cancer following combined preoperative chemotherapy and high dose radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994;30:169-75.
  15. Janjan NA, Khoo VS, Abbruzzese J, et al. Tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;44:1027-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00099-1
  16. Lee JH, Kim SH, Kim JG, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: predictors of the tumor response and the long-term oncologic outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;81:431-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.019
  17. Janjan NA, Crane C, Feig BW, et al. Improved overall survival among responders to preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2001;24:107-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-200104000-00001
  18. Park IJ, You YN, Skibber JM, et al. Comparative analysis of lymph node metastases in patients with ypT0-2 rectal cancers after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56:135-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e318278ff8a
  19. Gerard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S, et al. Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1638-44. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8376
  20. Gerard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S, et al. Clinical outcome of the ACCORD 12/0405 Prodige 2 randomized trial in rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:4558-65. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.8771
  21. Douglass HO Jr, Moertel CG, Mayer RJ, et al. Survival after postoperative combination treatment of rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1986;315:1294-5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198611133152014
  22. Fisher B, Wolmark N, Rockette H, et al. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy for rectal cancer: result from NSABP R-01. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988;80:21-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/80.1.21
  23. Lee JH, Lee JH, Ahn JH, et al. Randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant therapy in stage II and III rectal cancer to define the optimal sequence of chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a preliminary report. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1751-8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.07.037
  24. Minsky BD, Conti JA, Huang Y, Knopf K. Relationship of acute gastrointestinal toxicity and the volume of irradiated small bowel in patients receiving combined modality therapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:1409-16. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1995.13.6.1409
  25. Choy H, MacRae R, Story M. Basic concepts of chemotherapy and irradiation interaction. In: Halperin EC, Perez CA, Brady LW, editors. Perez and Brady's principles and practice of radiation oncology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 672-73.

Cited by

  1. Is elective inguinal radiotherapy necessary for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma invading anal canal? vol.9, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0296-1
  2. Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Levels Associated with Pathological Responses to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer vol.15, pp.13, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.13.5383
  3. Respuesta clínica completa postneoadyuvancia en cáncer de recto estadio III: observación o cirugía vol.29, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.22516/25007440.436
  4. KRAS Mutation Status Is Not a Predictor for Tumor Response and Survival in Rectal Cancer Patients Who Received Preoperative Radiotherapy With 5-Fluoropyrimidine Followed by Curative Surgery vol.94, pp.31, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000001284
  5. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by transanal local excision for T3 distal rectal cancer: A case report vol.11, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3065
  6. Association of pretreatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels with chemoradiation-induced downstaging and downsizing of rectal cancer vol.4, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2016.740
  7. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for stage II–III resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials vol.35, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2017.00059
  8. Sarcopenia is poor prognostic factor in older patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received preoperative or postoperative chemoradiotherapy vol.97, pp.48, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000013363
  9. Evaluation of the pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. Experience at the Instituto de Cancerología de Medellín (Colombia, 2011-2017) vol.86, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgmxen.2019.11.004