Spatial Information Research

  • 제21권1호
  • /
  • Pages.53-62
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2366-3286(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2366-3294(eISSN)
대한공간정보학회 (Korea Spatial Information Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

BIM 수행성과 평가도구의 개발방향에 대한 연구

A Study on the Development Direction of a BIM Performance Assessment Tool

  • Kang, Tae Wook (ICT Convergence Lab of Korea Institute of Construction Technology) ;
  • Won, Jongsung (Construction IT Lab of Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Ghang (Construction IT Lab of Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2012.12.03
  • 심사 : 2013.02.26
  • 발행 : 2013.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

BIM 성과평가란 건설프로젝트에 BIM을 도입했을 때, 개별적인 BIM 프로젝트로부터 얻어진 긍정적인 효과(예: 공기단축, 공사비 절감, 생산성 향상 등)를 평가하는 것을 의미한다. 본 연구에서는 BIM 성과평가도구가 국내에서 어떤 방향으로 개발되어야 하는지를 분석하기 위하여, 국내 BIM 전문가 자문을 통해 BIM 성과평가도구의 개발목적, 특성, 문제점에 대한 질의 항목을 도출하고, 4차에 걸쳐 실무자에게 설문을 배포, 회수 하였다. 회수된 결과를 통계적으로 분석하여 분야, 경력에 따른 각 항목들의 시각 차이를 분석하였다. 분석결과, 분야, 경력에 따라 BIM성과평가도구의 개발목적, 특성, 문제점에 대해 유의미한 관점 차이를 보였다. 이를 바탕으로 향후 BIM평가도구 개발 시 고려사항을 도출하였다.

The purpose of this study is to suggest the development direction of a BIM performance assessment tool. To do this, a series of focused group interviews were conducted with BIM experts in South Korea regarding the objective, characteristic, potential problems of a BIM performance assessment tool. A survey questionnaire was developed based on the focused group interviews and distributed to practitioners through four different occasions. The survey results showed that there were the significant differences between practitioners by their field and years of experience about the objective, characteristic, potential problems of a BIM performance assessment tool. Based on the survey results, the consideration factors for developing a BIM performance assessment tool was suggested.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bergs, R, 2009, BIM success forecasters by Gobar. Paper presentation at Kick-off Meeting TNO BIM Quickfscan. Utrecht, Netherlands.
  2. Berlo, L. v.; T. Dijkmans, H; Hendriks, D; Spekkink and W. Pel, 2012. BIM QuickScan: benchmark of BIM performance in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the CIB W78 2012: 29th International Conference, Beirut, Lebanon.
  3. bimSCORE, 2011. bimSCORE, http://www.bimscore.com/index.php/welcome.
  4. Chung, J. K; Kim, Y. S, 2012, Analysis of Core Ability of BIM Manage, Architectural Institute of Korea, 28(1):175-182.
  5. Indiana University Architect's Office, 2009, IU BIM Proficiency Matrix, Indiana University Architect's Office.
  6. Jin, H. C; Park, T. O, 2004, An Analysis of Education Programs for Spatial Information System, Korea Spatial Information Society, 97-105.
  7. Kam, C; Rinella, T, 2012, The BIM Scorecard-finding your formula for successful commissioning with BIM. AABC Commissioning 8th Annual Conference Total Building Commissioning. Las Vegas, NV, USA, bimSCORE.
  8. Kang, L. S; Kim, H. S; Moon, H. S; Kim, C. H; Kim, D. W, 2011, Development of Performance Indicators for Construction IT Tool based on BSC, The Korea Society For Railway
  9. Kang, T. W; Hong, C. H; Hwang, J. R; Choi, H. S, 2012, The External BIM Reference Model Suggestion for Interoperability Between BIM and GIS, Korea Spatial Information Society, 20(5):91-98. https://doi.org/10.12672/ksis.2012.20.5.091
  10. Lee, J. H, 2009, Development of BIM capability evaluation model for design organization, Iwha University.
  11. Lee, J. H; Yi J. S, 2011, A Study on BIM Capability Evaluation for Design Organization, Architectural Institute of Korea, 27(6): 257-266.
  12. McCuen, T; Suermann, M. P, 2007, The Interactive Capability Maturity Model and 2007 AIA TAP BIM Award Winners, 33, http://www.aecbytes.com/viewpoint/2007/issue_33.html.
  13. McCuen, T. L, 2008, Building information modeling and the interactive capability maturity model. Associated Schools of Construction International Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference, Auburn, Alabama.
  14. Sebastian, R; Berlo, L. v, 2010, Tool for benchmarking BIM performance of design, engineering and construction firms in the Netherlands, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6:254-263. https://doi.org/10.3763/aedm.2010.IDDS3
  15. Succar, B, 2009, Building information modeling maturity matrix. Handbook of Research on Building Information Modeling and Construction Informatics: Concepts and Technologies, IGI Global, 65-103.
  16. Seo, H. C; Oh, J. K; Kim, J. J, 2012, The Development of an Evaluation Model for the Work Environment of the BIM-based Architectural Design Firms, Architectural Institute of Korea, 28(5):95-105.
  17. Song, M. R; Yoon, S. W; Chin, S. Y, 2011, BSC Based Measurement of Satisfaction Degree For Based BIM Construction Projets, Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, 12(4):117-129. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2011.12.4.117
  18. University Architect's Office, 2012, BIM Guidelines & Standards for Architects, Engineers, and Contractors, Indiana University.