East Asian mathematical journal

The Youngnam Mathematical Society (영남수학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Mathematics Textbook's Contents Based on Davydov's Activity Theory

Davydov의 활동이론에 기반한 초등학교 수학교과서의 내용 분석

  • Han, Inki (Department of Mathematics Education Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2012.12.26
  • Accepted : 2013.02.22
  • Published : 2013.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper we study activity theory and Davydov's learning activity theory. We analyze brief history of activity theory in Russia, structure of human activity, and Davydov's studies in activity theory. Especially we analyze Davydov's 1st grade mathematics textbook, and try to investigate embodiment of Davydov's learning activity theory in his mathematics textbook.

Keywords

References

  1. 고정화, 학령 초의 활동주의적 수 개념 구성에 관한 연구, 수학교육학연구 17(3), 309-331(2007). Ko J. W., A Study on Activistic Construction of Number Concept in the Children at the Beginning of School Age , Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 17(3), 309-331(2007).
  2. 김수환, 수학교육에서의 활동 이론에 대한 구성주의자 관점에서의 분석, 과학과 수학교육논문집 20, 89-111(1999). Kim S. W., A Constructivist's Analysis for Activity Theory in Mathematics Education, Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 20, 89-111(1999).
  3. 김종백, 조형정, 영재를 위한 교수-학습과정 설계와 분석 틀로써의 활동이론, 영재와 영재교육 6(2), 129-148(2007). Kim J. B, Cho H. J., Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and designing teaching-learning for the gifted and talented, The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented 6(2), 129-148(2007).
  4. 이순주, 각 분야 영재들의 통찰적 사고 행위의 특성-러시아 활동주의 이론을 바탕으로, 영재교육연구 15(2), 35-57(2005). Lee S. J., The characteristic of insightful act of gifted students in each field-Based on the Russian Activities-Oriented Theory, Journal of Gifted/Talented Education 15(2), 35-57(2005).
  5. 이순주, 제3의 학습전략에 의한 수학 학습 활동의 실제-러시아의 활동이론을 중심으로, 수학교육학술지 5, 49-73(2000). Lee S. J., Mathematics Learning Activity in the 3rd Educational Strategy- Focused on Russian Activity Theory, Studies in Mathematical Education 5, 49-73(2000).
  6. 한인기, 창의력 증진교육과 교사의 역할, 중등학습지도 및 학력증진 맞춤형 직무연수, 울산교육연수원(2011). Han I., Enhancement Education of Creativity and Teacher's Role, Teacher Training for Secondary Instruction of Learning and Academic Achievement, Ulsan Edcation Training Institute(2011).
  7. 한인기, 교사를 위한 수학사, 교우사(2005). Han I., Mathematics History for Teachers, Kyowoosa(2005).
  8. Aismontas B. B., Obshaya psihologiya, Vlados press(2002).
  9. Belikov V. A., Obrazovanie, deyatelnocti, lichinosti , Izdatelstvo Akademiya Estestvoznaniya(2010).
  10. Davydov V. V. et al., Matematika: uchebnik dlya 1 klassa nachaloi shkoly, Vita press(2008).
  11. Davydov V. V., Ponyatie deyatelnocti kak osnovanie issledovanii nauchnoi shkoly L.S.Vygotsky, Voprocy psihologii No(5), 20-30(1996).
  12. Davydov V. V., Problemy razvivayushego obucheniya, Asademiya(2004).
  13. Davydov V. V., Teoriya razvivayushego obucheniya, Intor(1996).
  14. Davydov V. V., Vidy Obobsheniya v Obuchenii, Pedagogicheskoe Obshestvo Rossii(2000).
  15. Davydov V. V., Zinchenko V.P., Predmetnaya deyatelnocti i ontogenez poznaniya, Voprocy psihologii No(5), 12-30(1998).
  16. Dusavitskii A. K. et al., Urok v nachalnoi shkole , Vita press(2011).
  17. El'konin D. B., Psihicheskoe razvitie v detskih vozrastah, Voronez(2001).
  18. Gorbov S. F., Obuchenie matematike 1 klass, Vita press(2008).
  19. Leont'ev A. N., Deyatelnocti, soznanie, lichinosti, Politicheskay literatura (1975).
  20. Leont'ev A. N., Filosofiya psihologii, Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo Universiteta (1994).
  21. Petrovskii et al., Obshaya psihologiya, Prosveshenie(1986).
  22. Repkin V. V., Razvivayushee obuchenie i uchebnaya deyatelnocti, Riga (1997).
  23. Scheonfeld A. H., Mathematical problem solving, Orlando: Academic Press (1985).
  24. Zak A. Z., Razvitie teoreticheskogo myshleniya u mladshih shkolikov, Pedagogika (1984).

Cited by

  1. 수학 문제해결 과정에서 학습행위 형성 수준에 대한 연구 vol.53, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2014.53.1.75