DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Consideration of the Necessity of Seismic Retrofitting for Existing High Speed Rail Bridge in Accordance with Design Guidelines Improvements

설계기준 개선에 따른 기존 고속철도 교량 내진보강 필요성 고찰

  • Received : 2012.11.26
  • Accepted : 2013.01.10
  • Published : 2013.01.31

Abstract

This paper was calculated the earthquake load using ELFP(Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure) and RSA(Response Spectrum Analysis) for PSC Box Girder representative bridges by the Phase of KTX designed by ELFP and verified the difference of these analyses. It have been modeled 3 dimensional FE model of 5 bridges using a commercial FEM program for the comparison of these analyses using a commercial FEM program and were compared the earthquake load. It has been to confirm the increase of the difference ELFP of RSA calculated to seismic ground acceleration according to the ground condition and natural period. It is mean that the necessity of seismic reinforcement due to the application of a larger of earthquake load than designed earthquake load form the seismic performance evaluation result according to the difference of calculated earthquake loads.

본 논문은 등가정적하중법에 의해 설계된 경부고속철도 구간 중 PSC Box Girder 대표 교량들을 대상으로 등가정적법과 응답스팩트럼법을 이용하여 지진력이 산정되었고, 지진력의 차이가 확인된다. 해석법 비교를 위하여 상용유한요소 프로그램을 이용하여 5개 교량에 대한 3차원 유한유소 모델이 구성되었고, 각 해석법의 의한 지진력이 비교되었다. 고유주기가 저차에서 지배되는 경우, 지반조건과 고유주기의 따라 지진가속도가 산정되는 응답스팩트럼법과 등가정적하중법과의 차이가 커지는 것이 확인되었다. 이렇게 산정된 지진력에 차이에 따른 내진성능 평가 결과 설계 지진력 보다 큰 지진력의 적용으로 인한 것으로 내진 보강의 필요성을 의미한다.

Keywords

References

  1. S.H. Han, M.S. Bang, W.S. Lee(2010) A Study on Dynamic Capacity Assessment of PSC Box Girder High Speed Railway Bridges Using Time Series Load, KSCE, Vol.30 No.3A, pp.211-219.
  2. J. Kwark, B. Kim(1999) The Effects of Elastomer-Bearing on the Dynamic Behaviors of Bridge for KHSR, EESK, Vol.3, No.3, pp. 1-7.
  3. HRBC(1991) High speed railway concrete structure(RC and PC) design standard specifications (plan).
  4. Korail Osong facilities management office (2005) Longitudinal Force Transmitters Maintenance Manual, Korail, pp.1-2.
  5. KICT, EESK(1997) Seismic Desing Criteria Research (II)(Seismic Design Performance Criteria and Economic Evaluation), Ministry of Construction and Transportation, pp.432-437.
  6. J. Kwark(2000) Longitudinal Dynamic Behavior of KHSR-Bridge Installed Creep-Couplers, EESK, Vol.4, No.4, pp.111-116.
  7. AASHTO(1989) Standard Specification for Highway Bridges, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 16th Edition, pp.677.
  8. MOCT (2000) Road Design Criteria, Korea Road & Transportation Association, Korean Geotechnical Society.
  9. H. Bolton Seed, Celso Ugas, and John Lysmer(1976) Site-dependent spectra for earthquake-resistant design, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 221-243.
  10. Korea Rail Network Authority(2005) High speed railway design criteria(Vol. roadbed).
  11. Chopra A.K.(1995) Dynamics of Structure: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  12. Korea Rail Network Authority (2003) Gyeongbu high speed railway North Seoul with Cheonan(track The work on Zone 1) track construction working design report.
  13. D. Kim, H. Jang, Y. Oh(2012) Analysis comparison according to the seismic design criteria of change for using high-speed railway bridge, Korean Society for Railway fall conference.
  14. KISTEC, Seismic Performance Evaluationand Improvement Procedure for Existing Structures [Bridge](2012), Ministry of Land Transport and Maritime Affairs(plan).

Cited by

  1. Seismic Performance of the Catenary System Using Fragility Analysis vol.18, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.2.39
  2. Earthquake Response Characteristics of the Catenary Pole for Arrangement Conditions vol.18, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.3.31