Evaluation of Nutritional Improvement by Total Parenteral Nutrition Guideline in Early Malnourished Inpatients

입원초기 영양불량 환자의 TPN 지침에 따른 영양개선 평가

  • Cha, Yun Young (College of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Jung Tae (College of Pharmacy, Kyunghee University Hospital at Gangdong) ;
  • Lim, Sung Cil (College of Pharmacy, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 차윤영 (충북대학교 약학대학) ;
  • 김정태 (경희대학교 약학대학, 강동경희대학교병원) ;
  • 임성실 (가톨릭대학교 약학대학)
  • Received : 2013.11.21
  • Accepted : 2013.12.23
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition of inpatients has been associated with higher morbidity, mortality, cost, and longer hospital stay. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) therapy plays an important role in decreasing morbidity and mortality among critical inpatients in hospitals, and has been commonly used to improve clinical outcomes. However, only a few studies were conducted regarding patients' nutritional improvement by TPN. Method: This study therefore evaluated the changes in nutritional parameters by TPN therapy for early malnourished inpatients. Data from early malnourished inpatients who were treated with TPN therapy between January 2012 and June 2013 at the ${\bigcirc}{\bigcirc}$ university Hospital were studied retrospectively. Information regarding sex, age, underlying diseases, division, TPN (peripheral and central), and changes in nutritional parameters were collected by reviewing electronic medical records. The criteria for evaluation of the changes in nutritional parameters were included physical marker, body mass index (BMI), and biochemical markers, including albumin (Alb), total lymphocyte count (TLC), and cholesterol. Nutritional parameters were collected three times: pre-TPN, mid-TPN and end-TPN. A total of 149 patients (peripheral, 97; central, 52) was evaluated. Results: In all patients, the malnutrition number was significantly decreased following the complete TPN therapy (peripheral patients, pre-TPN: $3.33{\pm}0.12$, mid-TPN : $3.06{\pm}0.17$, and end-TPN: $2.85{\pm}0.21$ (p < 0.05); central patients, pre-TPN: $3.38{\pm}0.11$, mid-TPN: $3.06{\pm}0.13$, and end-TPN: $2.75{\pm}0.21$ (p < 0.05). The malnutrition number means number of nutrition parameters below normal range of malnutrition. In addition, all of the four nutritional parameters (BMI, Alb, TLC and cholesterol) were increased with duration of TPN periods for all patients, and the changes in the early stage were larger than in the late stage (p < 0.05). The nutritional parameters of non-cancer patients were increased to a greater extent compared to cancer patients with longer TPN therapy, but it was not significant. The nutritional parameters of younger patients (50-60 years) were also increased more than of older patients (70-80 years), but it was not significant. Conclusion: In conclusion, the TPN therapy decreases malnutritional status and improves nutritional parameters in malnourished patients, thereby decreasing morbidity and mortality. The combined evaluation of all four nutritional parameters is more accurate for nutritional assessment than a single one.

Keywords

References

  1. McWhirter JP, Pennington CR. Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital. BMJ 1994; 380: 945-58.
  2. Velanovich V. The value of routine preoperative laboratory testing in predicting postoperative complication, a multivariate analysis. Surgery 1991; 109: 236-43.
  3. Guidelines for hospital evaluation program (2009), Ministry for health, wealth and family affairs.
  4. Guideline for medical certification requirements (2010), Ministry for health, wealth and family affairs.
  5. Guidelines for clinical nutrition management (2010), Chung Buk National University Hospital.
  6. International classification of disease, 9th revision, clinical modification.
  7. Merritt R, DeLegge MH, Holcombe B, Mueller C, et al. The A.S.P.E.N. nutrition support practice manual (2nd ed), united states of America, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (2005).
  8. Edington J, Boorman J, Durrant ER, et al. Prevalence of malnutrition on admission to four hospitals in England, The Malnutrition Prevalence Group. Clin Nutr 2000; 19(3): 191-5. https://doi.org/10.1054/clnu.1999.0121
  9. Allison SP. Malnutrition, disease and outcome, Nutrition 2000; 16: 590-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00368-3
  10. Chima CS, Barco K, Dewitt ML, et al. Relationship of nutritional status to length of stay, hospital costs, and discharge status of patients hospitalized in the medicine service. J Am Diet Assoc 1997; 97: 975-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00235-6
  11. Gales BJ, Riley DG. Improved total parenteral nutrition therapy management by a nutritional support team, Hosp pharm 1994; 9(5): 469-75.
  12. Christensen KS, Gstundtner KM. Hospital wide screening improves basis for nutrition intervention. J Am Diet Assoc 1985; 85: 704-6.
  13. McMahon K, Decker G, Ottery FD. Integrating proactive nutritional assessment in clinical practices to prevent complications and cost. Semin Oncol 1998; 25(2 Suppl 6): 20-7.
  14. Rivadeneira DE, Evoy D, Fahey TJ, et al. Nutritional support of the cancer patient. CA Cancer J Clin 1998; 48(2): 69-80. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.48.2.69
  15. Reilly HM, Martineau JK, Moran A, et al. Nutritional screening evaluation and implementation of a simple nutrition risk score. Clin Nutr 1995; 14(5): 269-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5614(95)80063-8