DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Subfertility Problems Leading to Disposal of Breeding Bulls

  • Khatun, Marzina (Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, GADVASU) ;
  • Kaur, Simarjeet (Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, GADVASU) ;
  • Simarjeet, Simarjeet (Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, GADVASU) ;
  • Mukhopadhyay, C.S. (School of Animal Biotechnology, GADVASU)
  • Received : 2012.08.02
  • Accepted : 2012.10.31
  • Published : 2013.03.01

Abstract

Subfertility problems are encountered frequently in the cattle and buffalo bulls commercially maintained for semen production in dairy farms and under field conditions for natural insemination. Reports are scarce on the incidence of subfertility in breeding bulls, especially in India. The objective of the present study was to assess the incidence of the male reproductive anomalies leading to disposal of bovine bulls at GADVASU dairy farm, Ludhiana, Punjab (India). Data on frequency of various subfertility and disposal pattern of bulls maintained at the dairy farm, GADVASU, were collected for 12 yrs (1999 to 2010) and compiled from different record registers. Percentage of bulls that produced freezable semen (out of reserved ones) was less in cattle (25.641%) as compared to that of buffalo (30.4%). Various subfertility traits like poor libido and unacceptable seminal profile were found to be the significant reasons (p<0.01) for culling of the breeding bulls. Inadequate sex drive and poor semen quality were the main contributing factors for bull disposal in cattle whereas poor semen freezability was most frequently observed in buffalo bulls. All the male reproductive traits were significantly different (p<0.05) for the periods of birth, except for semen volume, initial motility (IM), age at last semen collection (ALSC) and age at disposal. The ages at first and last semen collection as well as freezing (i.e. AFSC, ALSC and AFSF, ALSF, respectively) and age at disposal (AD) were higher in buffalo. The spermatological parameters and semen production period (SPP) were higher in cattle. The age at first semen donation and breeding period could be reduced by introducing the bulls to training at an early age. The results revealed an increasing trend in individual motility (IM) while semen volume, AFSC, AFSF, AD, FSPP, SPP, ALSC and ALSF showed a decreasing, however, not a definite trend, over the periods. The semen donation traits like, AFSF, of the cattle and buffalo bulls could be predicted from the AFSC, using prediction equation derived in the present study.

Keywords

References

  1. Aehnelt, E., J. Hahn and J. K. Dittmar. 1963. Causes for and age at culling in A.I. bulls with special reference to the longevity of their dams and granddames. Tierarztl. Umsch. 18:408-416.
  2. Alvarez, C., J. A. Castilla, L. Martínez, J. P. Ramírez, F. Vergara and J. J. Gaforio. 2003. Biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects. Hum. Reprod. 18:2082-2088. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg430
  3. Bhakat, M., T. K. Mohanty, A. K. Gupta and V. S. Raina. 2009. Effect of season and management on semen quality of breeding bulls- A review. Agric. Rev. 30:79-93.
  4. Bhavsar, B. K. 1993. Perspective and prospective of the role of artificial insemination and gynecology in enhancing livestock production. Indian J. Anim. Reprod. 14:66-68.
  5. Daskin, A., N. Yurdaydin and T. Ozdemir. 1998. Effects of cryptorchidism on spermatological properties. J. Lalahan Livest. Res. Ins. (Turkey) 381:79-84.
  6. Djimde, M. and J. H. Weniger. 1984. Semen quality of bulls in relation to breeding groups and seasons in Bangladesh. Zeitscrift-fur-Tierzuchtung-und-zuchtungsbiologie. 101:59-69.
  7. Casas, E., D. D. Lunstra, L. V. Cundiff and J. J. Ford. 2007. Growth and pubertal development of $F_{1}$ bulls from Hereford, Angus, Norwegian Red, Swedish Red and White, Friesian, and Wagyu sires. J. Anim. Sci. 85:2904-2909. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0260
  8. Khate, K. 2005. Studies on multistage selection of dairy bulls. M.V.Sc. Thesis, National Dairy Research Institute. Karnal, Haryana, India.
  9. Kodagali, S. V., B. K. Bhavsar and F. S. Kavani. 1980. Age at and reasons of disposal of A.I. buffalo bulls. Indian J. Anim. Health. 19:31-34.
  10. Mathew, A., P. J. Joseph and T. K. Jose. 1982. Semen characteristics of purebred and crossbred bulls. Indian Vet. J. 59:364-367.
  11. Mathur, A. K., S. Tyagi and S. P. Singh. 2002. Frieswal bull- an experience of HF with Sahiwal. Saras J. Livest. Poult. Prod. 181:21-23.
  12. Maule, J. P. 1962. Ultra low temperature storage of semen. The semen of animals and artificial insemination. In: Technical Communication number 15 of Commonwealth Bureau of Animal Breeding and Genetics (Ed. C. A. B. Bucks) Edinburgh, England.
  13. Mukhopadhyay, C. S., A. K. Gupta, B. R. Yadav, K. Khate, V. S. Raina, T. K. Mohanty and P. P. Dubey. 2010. Subfertility in males: an important cause of bull disposal in bovines. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 23:450-455. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.90298
  14. Mukhopadhyay, C. S., A. K. Gupta, B. R. Yadav, A. Gupta, T. K. Mohanty and V. S. Raina. 2011. Study on the effect of various uncompensable traits on fertilizing potential in cattle and buffalo bulls. Livest. Sci. 136:114-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.08.010
  15. Rao, C. V. and A. V. N. Rao. 1995. Puberty and semen production period in breeding bulls. Indian Vet. J. 72:885-886.
  16. Rao, K. R., O. Sremanarayana and R. Mukundarao. 1995. Breeding life and disposal patterns of breeding bulls. Indian Vet. J. 72:883-884.
  17. Roman, J., C. J. Wilcox, R. B. Becker and M. Koger. 1968. Tenure and reasons of disposal of artificial insemination dairy sires. J. Dairy Sci. 52:1063-1069.
  18. Sahni, K. L. and G. Mohan. 1998. Annual report of animal reproduction division. Indian Veterinary Research Institute. Izatnagar, U.P.
  19. Sethi, R. K., V. S. Raina, B. K. Joshi and M. Gurnani. 1989. Multistage selection of crossbred males and effect of their age and body weight on semen quality and freezability. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 59:171-174.
  20. Snedecor, G. W. and W. G.. Cochran. 1994. Statistical Methods. 8th Ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.
  21. Sudheer, S. and C. J. Xavier. 2000. Disposal pattern of breeding bulls in Kerala. Indian J. Anim. Reprod. 211:72-73.
  22. Suryaprakasam, T. B. and A. V. N. Rao. 1993. Studies on breeding life and disposal pattern of AI sires in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Vet. J. 70:1022-1024.
  23. Tyagi, S., A. K. Mathur and S. C. Agarwal. 2000. Semen production performance of Frieswal bulls. Indian J. Anim. Reprod. 70:1032-1034.
  24. Walter, F. and K. Weisser. 1966. Reasons for wastage of bulls at an AI center. Terzucht. 20:72.
  25. Wilcox, C. J., J. Roman and R. B. Becker. 1966. Fate of young sires used for artificial insemination. J. Dairy Sci. 50:884-886.

Cited by

  1. Testicular Cell Indices and Peripheral Blood Testosterone Concentrations in Relation to Age and Semen Quality in Crossbred (Holstein Friesian×Tharparkar) Bulls vol.27, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14139
  2. Morphometric evaluation of seminiferous tubule and proportionate numerical analysis of Sertoli and spermatogenic cells indicate differences between crossbred and purebred bulls vol.8, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.645-650
  3. Evolutionary dynamics of meiotic recombination hotspots regulator PRDM9 in bovids vol.292, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-016-1260-6
  4. gene in bulls with varying seminal parameters vol.53, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13187
  5. Differential proteomic profile of spermatogenic and Sertoli cells from peri-pubertal testes of three different bovine breeds vol.2, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2014.00024
  6. Seasonal changes in semen quality and correlation with plasma hormone profiles in Karan Fries bulls vol.47, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2016.1213361
  7. Mortality and Culling Pattern of Tharparkar Cattle Males in an Organised Herd vol.11, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2016.371.376
  8. Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of Spermatozoa From High- and Low-Fertile Crossbred Bulls: Implications for Fertility Prediction vol.9, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.647717