Asian review of World Histories

The Asian Association of World Historians (아시아세계사학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Thinking Modernity Historically: Is "Alternative Modernity" the Answer?

  • Published : 2013.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This essay offers a historically based critique of the idea of "alternative modernities" that has acquired popularity in scholarly discussions over the last two decades. While significant in challenging Euro/American-centered conceptualizations of modernity, the idea of "alternative modernities" (or its twin, "multiple modernities") is open to criticism in the sense in which it has acquired currency in academic and political circles. The historical experience of Asian societies suggests that the search for "alternatives" long has been a feature of responses to the challenges of Euromodernity. But whereas "alternative" was conceived earlier in systemic terms, in its most recent version since the 1980s cultural difference has become its most important marker. Adding the adjective "alternative" to modernity has important counter-hegemonic cultural implications, calling for a new understanding of modernity. It also obscures in its fetishization of difference the entrapment of most of the "alternatives" claimed--products of the reconfigurations of global power--within the hegemonic spatial, temporal and developmentalist limits of the modernity they aspire to transcend. Culturally conceived notions of alternatives ignore the common structural context of a globalized capitalism which generates but also sets limits to difference. The seeming obsession with cultural difference, a defining feature of contemporary global modernity, distracts attention from urgent structural questions of social inequality and political injustice that have been globalized with the globalization of the regime of neoliberal capitalism. Interestingly, "the cultural turn" in the problematic of modernity since the 1980s has accompanied this turn in the global political economy during the same period. To be convincing in their claims to "alterity", arguments for "alternative modernities" need to re-articulate issues of cultural difference to their structural context of global capitalism. The goal of the discussion is to work out the implications of these political issues for "revisioning" the history and historiography of modernity.

Keywords

References

  1. Ralph Weber, "What is 'Modernities' a Plural of? A Rhetorical Analysis of Some Recent Uses," in Modernities: Sites, Concepts, and Temporalities in Asia and Europe, ed. Sven Trakulhun and Ralph Weber (forthcoming SUNY Press).
  2. Dilip P. Gaonkar, ed., Alternative Modernities (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001), 1.
  3. Raymond Williams, The Sociology of Culture (New York: Schocken Books, 1981), 203-5.
  4. Dipesh Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).
  5. Carl Pletsch, "The Three Worlds, or the Division of Social Scientific Labor, Circa 1950- 1975," Comparative Studies in Society and History 23 (October 1981): 565-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500013566
  6. Charles Taylor, "Two Theories of Modernity," in Alternative Modernities, ed. Gaonkar, 172-96.
  7. Joseph R. Levenson, Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: A Trilogy, vol. 1 of The Problem of Intellectual Continuity (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1968), 59-78.
  8. Nestor Garcia Canclini, Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity, tr. by Christopher L. Chiappati and Sylvia L. Lopez (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1995)
  9. Wang Ning, Translated Modernities: Literary and Cultural Perspectives on Globalization and China (Ottawa: Legas, 2010).
  10. Bruno Latour, We Have Never Been Modern, trans. Catherine Porter (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).
  11. Gaonkar, Alternative Modernities, 15.
  12. Sudipta Kaviraj, "An Outline of a Revisionist Theory of Modernity," Archives of European Sociology 46, no. 3 (2005): 497-526 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975605000196
  13. Partha Chatterjee, Lineages of Political Society: Studies in Postcolonial Democracy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011).
  14. Ahmet Davutoglu, Alternative Paradigms: The Impact of Islamic and Western Weltanschauungs on Political Theory (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1994), 195
  15. Lynn Pan in Sons of the Yellow Emperor: A History of the Chinese Diaspora (Tokyo: Kodansha International, 1994), 267
  16. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Commonwealth (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009), 101-18.
  17. Chatterjee, Lineages of Political Society, 249.
  18. Journal of Modern European History 4, no. 2 (2006), "Beyond Hegemony: 'Europe' and the Politics of Non-Western Elites, 1900-1930,"
  19. Cemil Aydin, The Politics of Anti-Westernism in Asia: Visions of World Order in PanIslamic and Pan-Asian Thought (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007).
  20. Luo Rongqu, ed., Cong 'Xihua' dao xiandaihua (From 'Westernization' to Modernization [Contemporanization]) (Beijing: Beijing University Press, 1990)
  21. Ziya Gokalp, Turk'culugun Esaslari (Principles of Turkism), ed. Mehmet Kaplan (Istanbul: Ministry of National Education, 1990)
  22. Arif Dirlik, "Culturalism as Hegemonic Ideology and Liberating Practice," in The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997), 23-51
  23. Arif Dirlik, After the Revolution: Waking to Global Capitalism (Hanover and London: Wesleyan University Press/ University Press of New England, 1994)
  24. Fredric Jameson, The Cultural Turn: Selected Writings on the Postmodern, 1983-1988 (London: Verso, 1999).
  25. Jack Goody, Capitalism and Modernity: The Great Debate (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2004), 6.
  26. Aihwa Ong, Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999), 35.
  27. Fredric Jameson, A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present (London: Verso, 2002), 12-13.
  28. Peter Gay, Modernism: The Lure of Heresy: From Baudelaire to Beckett and Beyond (New York: W.W. Norton, 2008), 18.
  29. Marshall Berman, All That Is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity (New York: Penguin Books, 1982).
  30. Perry Anderson, "Modernity and Revolution," New Left Review 144 (March/April 1984): 96-113.
  31. E. Fuat Keyman and Berrin Koyuncu, "Globalization, alternative modernities and the political economy of Turkey," Review of International Political Economy 12, no. 1 (February 2005): 105-28, 124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049896
  32. Arif Dirlik, Culture and History in Post-Revolutionary China: The Perspective of Global Modernity (Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 2011).
  33. Arif Dirlik, Global Modernity: Modernity in the Age of Global Capitalism (Boulder, CO:Paradigm Publishers, 2006)
  34. Arif Dirlik, "Revisioning Modernity: Modernity in Eurasian Perspectives," Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 12, no. 3 (June 2011): 284-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2011.554655
  35. Takeuchi Yoshimi, "Asia as Method," that has been revived in recent discussions, most notably in Kuanhsing Chen, Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010)
  36. Wang Hui, "The Politics of Imagining Asia: A Genealogical Analysis," Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 8, no. 1 (2007): 1-33 https://doi.org/10.1080/14649370601118925
  37. the collection of his essays in What Is Modernity? Writings of Takeuchi Yoshimi, ed. and trans. Richard F. Calichman (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007).
  38. Ralph Weber, "On Wang Hui's Re- Imagination of Europe and Asia," Europa Regional 17, no. 4 (2009): 221-7.
  39. the essays in the special issue of China Perspectives 2011, no. 1 (2011), "The National Learning Revival," ed. Arif Dirlik.
  40. Gaonkar, Alternative Modernities, 1.
  41. S.N. Eisenstadt, "Multiple Modernities," in "Multiple Modernities," ed. Einsenstadt, Daedalus 129, no. 1 (Winter 2000): 1-29, 2.
  42. Andre Gunder Frank, Re-Orient: Global Economy in the Asian Age (Berkeley: University of California, 1998)
  43. Kenneth Pomeranz, The Great Divergence: China, Europe and the Making of the Modern World Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000)
  44. Bin Wong, China Transformed: Historical Change and the Limits of the European Experience (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997).
  45. the essays in the special issue of Daedalus 127, no. 3 (Summer 1998),
  46. William H. McNeill, "Leaving Western Civ Behind," Liberal Education, 97, no. 3/4 (Summer/Fall 2011): 40-47, 47.
  47. Robert McNeill and William H. McNeill, The Human Web: A Bird's Eye View of World History (New York: W.W. Norton, 2003).
  48. John F. Richards, "Early Modern India and World History," Journal of World History 8, no. 2 (1997): 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2005.0071
  49. Timur Kuran, The Long Divergence: How Islamic Law Held Back the Middle East (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011).
  50. Joseph Levenson's European Expansion and the Counter-Example of Asia, 1300-1600 (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1967)
  51. Merchants and Revolution: Commercial Change, Political Conflict, and London's Overseas Traders, 1550-1653 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993)
  52. Eric Wolf, Europe and the People Without History (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1982), 71.
  53. Christopher I. Beckwith, Empires of the Silk Road: A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the Present (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009), 183.
  54. Wang Mingming, Empire and Local Worlds: A Chinese Model of Longterm Historical Anthropology (Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 2009), chap. 6.
  55. Joseph Needham, Science and Civilisation in China, Volume 3: "Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth" (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1959), 554-56
  56. Gary Ledyard, "Cartography in Korea," in The History of Cartography, vol. II, Book 2 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), 235-345
  57. The Map of the World and Geographical Knowledge in East Asia in Late Medieval Antiquity) ((Nanjing: Phoenix Publishers, 2010).
  58. Jerry Brotton, Trading Territories: Mapping the Early Modern World (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998).
  59. Sumathi Ramaswamy, "Conceit of the Globe in Mughal Visual Practice," Comparative Studies in Society and History 49, no. 4 (2007): 751-82.
  60. J.M. Blaut, The Colonizer's Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History (New York: The Guilford Press, 1993), 5.
  61. Partha Chatterjee, Nationalist Thought in the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse? (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1986), chaps. 1-2.
  62. Matei Calinescu, Five Faces of Modernity: Modernism, Avant-Garde, Decadence, Kitsch, Postmodernism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1987), 13-14.
  63. Making Sense in Life and Literature, trans. Glen Burns (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1992), 79-110.
  64. Jerry H. Bentley, "Beyond Modernocentrism: Toward Fresh Visions of the Global Past," in Contact and Exchange in the Ancient World, ed. Victor H. Mair (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2006), 17-29.
  65. Jane Burbank and Frederick Cooper, Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010)
  66. Jack Goody, Renaissances: The One or the Many (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010)
  67. The Theft of History (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006), chaps. 7 and 9
  68. Capitalism and Modernity: The Great Debate (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2004)
  69. McNeill and McNeill, The Human Web; Dipesh Chakrabarty, "The Climate of History," Critical Inquiry 35, no. 2 (Winter 2009): 197-222 https://doi.org/10.1086/596640
  70. David Christian, Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History (2005; Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2011).
  71. Gumprecht, "A History of the Concept 'Modern,'" 107
  72. Reinhart Koselleck, Futures Past: The Semantics of Historical Time, trans. Keith Tribe (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985)
  73. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts, trans. Samuel Presner and Others (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002)
  74. Taylor, "Two Theories of Modernity," for the question of religion in modernity, which the author has taken up at length in his works, most notably, A Secular Age (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007).
  75. Chatterjee, Lineages of Political Society, 23.
  76. "History's Forgotten Doubles," History and Theory 34, no. 2 (1995): 44-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505434
  77. Linda Tuhiwai Smith, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (London: Zed Books, 1999)
  78. Apologies to Thucydides: Understanding History as Culture and Vice Versa (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2004).
  79. Sanjay Subrahmanyan, "Hearing Voices: Vignettes of Early Modernity in South Asia, 1400-1750," Daedalus 127, no.3 (Summer 1998): 75-104, 99-100.
  80. Koselleck, The Practice of Conceptual History, chap. 10, "The Eighteenth Century as the Beginning of Modernity."
  81. Michael Adas, ed., Islamic and European Expansion: The Forging of a Global Order (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1993).
  82. A Study and Collated Translation of Rashid al-Din's History of China in Jami'al-Tavarikh by Wang Yidan, (Beijing: Kunlun Press, 2006).
  83. Bruce Mazlish, The Idea of Humanity in a Global Era (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).
  84. Walter Mignolo, The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options (Latin America Otherwise) (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011
  85. Meera Nanda, Prophets Facing Backward: Postmodern Critiques of Science and Hindu Nationalism in India (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1997).
  86. Tu Wei-ming ed., Confucian Ethics Today: The Singapore Challenge (Singapore: Curriculum Development Institute, 1984), esp. 4-10, 27-29
  87. Tu Wei-ming, Ruxue disan shiqi fazhande qianjingwenti (On the Question of the Prospect of Development of a Third Stage of Confucianism) (Taipei: Lianjing chuban shiye gongsi, 1989), 6-16.

Cited by

  1. Response vol.7, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2013.828906
  2. Global History: Traditions, Innovations, Debates pp.1470-1316, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2018.1497615
  3. Rightful Resistance: A Discursive Third Realm? vol.17, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.314226
  4. Editorial : Power and Knowledge in 21st Century China: Producing Social Sciences. Issues in Social Science Debate in Xi Jinping’s China vol.2018, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.8370
  5. What is behind Myth and History in Derek Walcott’s Omeros? vol.7, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1776945
  6. An alternative discourse of modernity in a Chinese monster film: The Great Wall vol.34, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2019.1694050
  7. Turkey’s queer times: epistemic challenges vol.64, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2021.5
  8. Making sense of the new: Progress of modernity in colonial Odisha (1866-1916) Part I vol.18, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.12641