DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Associated with the Success of Trial Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain from Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

  • Son, Byung-Chul (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Deok-Ryeong (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Won (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Chough, Chung-Kee (Department of Neurosurgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2013.04.22
  • Accepted : 2013.12.12
  • Published : 2013.12.28

Abstract

Objective : Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective means of treatment of chronic neuropathic pain from failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Because the success of trial stimulation is an essential part of SCS, we investigated factors associated with success of trial stimulation. Methods : Successful trial stimulation was possible in 26 of 44 patients (63.6%) who underwent insertion of electrodes for the treatment of chronic pain from FBSS. To investigate factors associated with successful trial stimulation, patients were classified into two groups (success and failure in trial). We investigated the following factors : age, sex, predominant pain areas (axial, limb, axial combined with limbs), number of operations, duration of preoperative pain, type of electrode (cylindrical/paddle), predominant type of pain (nociceptive, neuropathic, mixed), degree of sensory loss in painful areas, presence of motor weakness, and preoperative Visual Analogue Scale. Results : There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, degree of pain, number of operations, and duration of pain (p>0.05). Univariate analysis revealed that the type of electrode and presence of severe sensory deficits were significantly associated with the success of trial stimulation (p<0.05). However, the remaining variable, sex, type of pain, main location of pain, degree of pain duration, degree of sensory loss, and presence of motor weakness, were not associated with the trial success of SCS for FBSS. Conclusion : Trial stimulation with paddle leads was more successful. If severe sensory deficits occur in the painful dermatomes in FBSS, trial stimulation were less effective.

Keywords

References

  1. Allegri M, Arachi G, Barbieri M, Paulin L, Bettaglio R, Bonetti G, et al. : Prospective study of the success and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation. Minerva Anestesiol 70 : 117-124, 2004
  2. Andersson HI, Ejlertsson G, Leden I, Schersten B : Impact of chronic pain on health care seeking, self care, and medication. Results from a population-based Swedish study. J Epidemiol Community Health 53 : 503-509, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.8.503
  3. Bala MM, Riemsma RP, Nixon J, Kleijnen J : Systematic review of the (cost-)effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for people with failed back surgery syndrome. Clin J Pain 24 : 741-756, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e318179032a
  4. Beersen N, Redekop WK, de Bruijn JH, Theuvenet PJ, Berg M, Klazinga NS : Quality based social insurance coverage and payment of the application of a high cost medical therapy : the case of spinal cord stimulation for chronic non-oncologic pain in The Netherlands. Health Policy 71 : 107-115, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.08.002
  5. Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, et al. : Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain 114 : 29-36, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010
  6. Broggi G, Servello D, Dones I, Carbone G : Italian multicentric study on pain treatment with epidural spinal cord stimulation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 62 : 273-278, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1159/000098632
  7. Burchiel KJ, Anderson VC, Wilson BJ, Denison DB, Olson KA, Shatin D : Prognostic factors of spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain. Neurosurgery 36 : 1101-1110; discussion 1110-1111, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199506000-00006
  8. Burton CV : Failed back surgery patients : the alarm bells are ringing. Surg Neurol 65 : 5-6, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2005.08.018
  9. Campbell CM, Jamison RN, Edwards RR : Psychological screening/phenotyping as predictors for spinal cord stimulation. Curr Pain Headache Rep 17 : 307, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-012-0307-6
  10. Canlas B, Drake T, Gabriel E : A severe case of complex regional pain syndrome I (reflex sympathetic dystrophy) managed with spinal cord stimulation. Pain Pract 10 : 78-83, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00321.x
  11. Celestin J, Edwards RR, Jamison RN : Pretreatment psychosocial variables as predictors of outcomes following lumbar surgery and spinal cord stimulation : a systematic review and literature synthesis. Pain Med 10 : 639-653, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00632.x
  12. Chan CW, Peng P : Failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med 12 : 577-606, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01089.x
  13. Chou R : Generating evidence on spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome : not yet fully charged. Clin J Pain 24 : 757-758, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181808486
  14. Doleys DM : Psychological factors in spinal cord stimulation therapy : brief review and discussion. Neurosurg Focus 21 : E1, 2006
  15. Frey ME, Manchikanti L, Benyamin RM, Schultz DM, Smith HS, Cohen SP : Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome : a systematic review. Pain Physician 12 : 379-397, 2009
  16. Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, Molet J, et al. : Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain : a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain 132 : 179-188, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.028
  17. Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, Molet J, et al. : The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained : a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery 63 : 762-770; discussion 770, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000325731.46702.D9
  18. Law JD, Lehman RA, Kirsch WM : Reoperation after lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. J Neurosurg 48 : 259-263, 1978 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1978.48.2.0259
  19. Lehmann TR, LaRocca HS : Repeat lumbar surgery. A review of patients with failure from previous lumbar surgery treated by spinal canal exploration and lumbar spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 6 : 615-619, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198111000-00014
  20. Manca A, Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, et al. : Quality of life, resource consumption and costs of spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management in neuropathic pain patients with failed back surgery syndrome (PROCESS trial). Eur J Pain 12 : 1047-1058, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.01.014
  21. Meglio M, Cioni B, Visocchi M, Tancredi A, Pentimalli L : Spinal cord stimulation in low back and leg pain. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 62 : 263-266, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1159/000098630
  22. Meyerson BA, Linderoth B : Mode of action of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 31 (4 Suppl) : S6-S12, 2006
  23. Miller B, Gatchel RJ, Lou L, Stowell A, Robinson R, Polatin PB : Interdisciplinary treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) : a comparison of FBSS and non-FBSS patients. Pain Pract 5 : 190-202, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2005.05304.x
  24. Nachemson AL : Evaluation of results in lumbar spine surgery. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 251 : 130-133, 1993
  25. North RB, Campbell JN, James CS, Conover-Walker MK, Wang H, Piantadosi S, et al. : Failed back surgery syndrome : 5-year follow-up in 102 patients undergoing repeated operation. Neurosurgery 28 : 685-690; discussion 690-691, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199105000-00008
  26. North RB, Ewend MG, Lawton MT, Piantadosi S : Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain : superiority of "multi-channel" devices. Pain 44 : 119-130, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(91)90125-H
  27. North RB, Kidd DH, Farrokhi F, Piantadosi SA : Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain : a randomized, controlled trial. Neurosurgery 56 : 98-106; discussion 106-107, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000144839.65524.E0
  28. North RB, Kidd DH, Olin JC, Sieracki JM : Spinal cord stimulation electrode design : prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes-part I : technical outcomes. Neurosurgery 51 : 381-389; discussion 389-390, 2002
  29. North RB, Kidd DH, Petrucci L, Dorsi MJ : Spinal cord stimulation electrode design : a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous with laminectomy electrodes : part II-clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery 57 : 990-996; discussion 990-996, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000180030.00167.b9
  30. North RB, Lanning A, Hessels R, Cutchis PN : Spinal cord stimulation with percutaneous and plate electrodes : side effects and quantitative comparisons. Neurosurg Focus 2 : e3, 1997
  31. Sears NC, Machado AG, Nagel SJ, Deogaonkar M, Stanton-Hicks M, Rezai AR, et al. : Long-term outcomes of spinal cord stimulation with paddle leads in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome and failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation 14 : 312-318; discussion 318, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00372.x
  32. Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB : Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns : preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg 46 : 489-491, 1967
  33. Sparkes E, Raphael JH, Duarte RV, LeMarchand K, Jackson C, Ashford RL : A systematic literature review of psychological characteristics as determinants of outcome for spinal cord stimulation therapy. Pain 150 : 284-289, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.05.001
  34. Spiegelmann R, Friedman WA : Spinal cord stimulation : a contemporary series. Neurosurgery 28 : 65-70; discussion 70-71, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199101000-00011
  35. Taylor RS : Spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome and refractory neuropathic back and leg pain/failed back surgery syndrome : results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage 31 (4 Suppl) : S13-S19, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.12.010
  36. Taylor RS, Van Buyten JP, Buchser E : Spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain and failed back surgery syndrome : a systematic review and analysis of prognostic factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 152-160, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000149199.68381.fe
  37. Taylor RS, Van Buyten JP, Buchser E : Spinal cord stimulation for complex regional pain syndrome : a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness literature and assessment of prognostic factors. Eur J Pain 10 : 91-101, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.02.004
  38. Tunks ER, Crook J, Weir R : Epidemiology of chronic pain with psychological comorbidity : prevalence, risk, course, and prognosis. Can J Psychiatry 53 : 224-234, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370805300403
  39. Waguespack A, Schofferman J, Slosar P, Reynolds J : Etiology of long-term failures of lumbar spine surgery. Pain Med 3 : 18-22, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4637.2002.02007.x
  40. Yanamoto F, Murakawa K : The effects of temporary spinal cord stimulation (or spinal nerve root stimulation) on the management of early postherpetic neuralgia from one to six months of its onset. Neuromodulation 15 : 151-154; discussion 154, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00438.x

Cited by

  1. Dynamic Pain Phenotypes are Associated with Spinal Cord Stimulation‐Induced Reduction in Pain: A Repeated Measures Observational Pilot Study vol.16, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12732
  2. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Neuropathic Pain of Neuralgic Amyotrophy vol.11, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2015.11.2.162
  3. Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of chronic pain syndromes vol.80, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro201680247-52
  4. Pedometry as an External Measure of Spinal Cord Stimulation Patient Outcomes vol.19, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12377
  5. Spinal Cord Stimulation Alters Protein Levels in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Neuropathic Pain Patients: A Proteomic Mass Spectrometric Analysis vol.19, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12473
  6. The Volume‐Outcome Effect: Impact on Trial‐to‐Permanent Conversion Rates in Spinal Cord Stimulation vol.20, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12526
  7. Explantation Rates and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Spinal Cord Stimulation vol.20, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12567
  8. Long-Term Outcome of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: 20 Years of Experience With 224 Consecutive Patients vol.84, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy194
  9. A Review of Emerging Evidence for Utilization of a Percutaneous Interspinous Process Decompression Device to Treat Symptomatic Lumbar Adjacent-Segment Degeneration vol.20, pp.suppl2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz247
  10. Association Between Pain Scores and Successful Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation vol.23, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13044
  11. Long-Term Multicolumn-Lead Spinal Cord Stimulation Efficacy in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Six-Year Prospective Follow-up Study vol.142, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.181
  12. Experiences From the Patient Perspective on Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Qualitatively Driven Mixed Method Analysis vol.24, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13277
  13. Successful Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain With Lower Than Usual Placement of High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient With Uncorrected Tethered Cord: Case Report vol.2, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1093/neuopn/okab012
  14. Age as an Independent Predictor of Adult Spinal Cord Stimulation Pain Outcomes vol.100, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1159/000517426