Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society (한국지반환경공학회 논문집)

Korean Geo-Environmental Society (한국지반환경공학회)
권호 표지

Case Study of Comparative Analysis between Static and Dynamic Loading Test of PHC Pile

굴착 후 타입된 PHC 말뚝의 재하시험 결과 비교분석 사례 연구

  • Published : 2013.11.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the west coastal soft ground, the static and dynamic loading tests for PHC piles which were executed using light driving without injecting cement milk were carried out and the correlation was analyzed. Initial dynamic loading test used hydraulic hammer(ram weight 70kN) and final average penetration effect presented 3.0 to 8.0mm at 0.8m drop. Then final allowable bearing capacity using CAPWAP presented 776.4 to 1,053.6kN a pile. The static loading tests which were performed at the other piles loaded 200% of the design load dividing by eight phases. As the result, total settlement was 15.97 to 16.38mm and residual settlement was 4.48 to 5.38mm, but both yielding and ultimate load can't be estimated. Therefore, allowable bearing capacity was determined larger than 1,200kN a pile regarding maximum test load as yielding load. Thus, it showed that allowable bearing capacity of the dynamic loading test was larger than static loading test in 1.54 to 1.14 times.

서해안 연약지반에서 굴착 후 시멘트밀크의 주입없이 경타로 시공된 PHC 말뚝에 대하여 동재하시험과 정재하시험을 병행하여 그 상관성을 분석하였다. 초기 동재하시험은 Hydraulic Hammer(Ram Weight 7.0tf)를 사용하여 낙하고 0.8m에서 최종 평균 관입량은 3.0~8.0mm로 측정되었다. 이때 CAPWAP 분석결과에 의한 최종 허용지지력은 776.4~1,053.6kN/본으로 확인되었다. 정재하시험은 동재하시험을 한 동일 말뚝에 실시하는 것이 가장 이상적이나, 현장 여건상 인접의 말뚝에 설계지지력(120.0tf)의 200%인 총 시험하중(2,400.0kN)을 8단계로 나누어 재하시험한 결과, 총침하량은 15.97~16.38mm, 잔류침하량은 4.48~5.38mm로 측정되었으며, 모든 분석법을 적용하여도 항복하중과 극한하중은 확인되지 않았다. 따라서 최대시험하중(240.0tf)을 항복하중으로 간주하여 안전율 2.0으로 나누어 허용지지력을 산정한 결과 허용지지력은 1,200kN/본 이상 되는 것으로 나타났다. 그 결과 정재하시험보다 동재하시험이 1.54~1.1.4배 큰 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, J. P., Lee, J. U. and Kim, D. C.(2004), A Study on the decision of bearing capacity of pile by dynamic load test, KSCE Conference 2004, pp. 2313-2318 (in Korean).
  2. American Society for Testing and Materials(1994), Standard test methods for deep foundations under static axial compressive load(ASTM D1143), ASTM, West Conshohocken, pp. 1-11.
  3. Chae, S. G.(2010), Foundation method practice, Lecture Note, Construction Industry Institute, pp. 60-68 (in Korean).
  4. Chae, S. G. and Kim, H. G.(2013), Design and construction manual of large diameter PHC piles, ENG Book, pp. 140-155 (in Korean).
  5. Chun, B. S. and Cho, C. W.(1997), Analysis of load-settlement curves in driven and embedded piles, Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol. 11, No. 9, pp.27-38 (in Korean).
  6. Hong, H. S., Lee, W. J., Kim, S. I. and Lee, M. W.(1995a), Study on a evaluation of pile bearing capacity using dynamic test, KGS Fall Conference, pp. 43-53 (in Korean).
  7. Hong, H. S., Cho, C. W., Yi, C. T., Lee, W. J. and Lee, M. W.(1995b), The reliability od dynamic pile loading test, KGS Fall Conference, pp. 26-30 (in Korean).
  8. Hong, W. P. and Kim, J. H.(2010), Lateral earth pressures on buried pipes due to lateral flow of soft grounds, Journal of The Korean Geo-Environmental Society, Vol. 11, No. 9, pp. 27-38 (in Korean).
  9. KIGAM(1988), Korea geology map (in Korean).
  10. Korea Agency for Technology and Standard(1979), Standard method of testing piles under axial compressive load(KS F2445), KATS, pp. 1-10 (in Korean).
  11. Korean Geotechnical Society(2009), Structural foundation design criteria, pp. 293-431 (in Korean).
  12. Lee, G. S., Jung, S. G., Kim, T. H. and Lee, S.(2000), Analysis on comparison of pile bearing capacity in dynamic and static loading test, KSCE Conference, pp. 207-212 (in Korean).