DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Viewstack Analysis Method for Urban Visibility Evaluation - A Comparative Case Study Between Insa-Dong and Myung-Dong -

도시 가시도 분석을 위한 Viewstack 분석법 - 인사동과 명동 사례 비교 연구 -

  • 이성기 (성균관대학교 건축학과)
  • Published : 2013.05.25

Abstract

This paper reports on one-view-oriented visibility analysis and evaluation model called Viewstack. The proposed visual analysis algorithm is developed using Korean cadastral data based on Viewshed and Viewsphere concepts to resemble human's visual perception more closely. Compared to another visual analysis models, the proposed model has several advantages that is simple to utilize and can be used collaboratively with another multi-purpose analysis tools. Thus the suggested 'Viewstack' algorithm can be used for design alternative evaluation, which can give design-stakeholder assistant in a quantitative way when they run into design decision making process and so on. The objective of such analysis and evaluations is to examine and characterize view's visual perception based on urban morphologies and architectural configurations. This paper can contribute to the tool development of quantitative comparative evaluation of building shapes and spatial configurations related to the 3D observation of open space for future urban planning, design study, and practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Yang, P. P. J., Putra, S. Y. & Li, W. 2007, Viewsphere: a GIS-based 3D visibility analysis for urban design evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34, 971-992. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32142
  2. Peponis J, Wineman J, Rashid M, Bafna S, Kim S H, 1998, "Describing plan configuration according to the covisibility of surfaces" Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25(5) 693-708 https://doi.org/10.1068/b250693
  3. Wang, J., Robinson, G. J. & White, K. 2000, Generating viewsheds without using sightlines. 66, 87-90.
  4. Teller, J., 2003, A spherical metric for the field-oriented analysis of complex urban open spaces, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 339-356. https://doi.org/10.1068/b12930
  5. Turner, A., 2003, Analysing the visual dynamics of spatial morphology, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 657-676. https://doi.org/10.1068/b12962
  6. Turner, A., Doxa, M., O'Sullivan, D., and Penn, A., 2001, From isovists to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2684
  7. Llobera, M., 2003, Extending GIS-based visual analysis: the concept of visualscapes, International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 17, 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/713811741
  8. Fisher-Gewirtzman, D., Pinsly, D. S., Wagner, I. A., and Burt, M., 2005, View-oriented three-dimensional visual analysis models for the urban environment, Urban Design International, 10, 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000133
  9. Gibson, J. J., 1986, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
  10. Hillier, B., 1996, Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  11. Hillier, B., Hanson, J., 1984, The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  12. Wang, J., Robinson, G. J. & White, K., 2000, Generating viewsheds without using sightlines. 66, 87-90.
  13. Bishop, I. D. 2002, Determination of thresholds of visual impact: the case of wind turbines. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29, 707-718. https://doi.org/10.1068/b12854
  14. Jiang, B. 1999, SimPed simulating pedestrian flows in a virtual urban environment, Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 3(1): 21-30.
  15. Cullen G, 1961, Townscape, Architectural Press, London.
  16. Lynch K, 1976, Managing the Sense of Regions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  17. Lynch K, Appleyard D, Meyer J R, 1964, The View From the Road, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.