DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Yield and Economical Efficiency by Application Methods of Liquid Pig Manure on Forage Crops

  • Ahn, Chang-Hyun (Korea Plant Environmental Research Station Ltd.) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Sik (Korea Plant Environmental Research Station Ltd.) ;
  • Park, Jee-Sung (Korea Plant Environmental Research Station Ltd.) ;
  • Ahn, In (Korea Eco-Friendly Agro-Materials Association)
  • 투고 : 2013.10.29
  • 심사 : 2013.11.28
  • 발행 : 2013.12.31

초록

This experiment was carried out to investigate the effect of liquid-pig-manure application method (Tr.1: surface appl. LPM 150%, Tr.2: surface appl. LPM 50% + LPM 50%, Tr.3: chemical fertilizer, Tr.4: soil injection LPM 150%, Tr.5: soil injection LPM 50% + surface appl. 50%, Tr.6: no fertilizer) and the economic efficiency of yield on forage crops cultivaion. In barley cultivation experiment, Tr.5 was found to be best, showing the yield of 1,462 kg $10a^{-1}$, and followed by Tr.2(1,226 kg $10a^{-1}$), Tr.3(1,226 kg $10a^{-1}$), Tr.4(1,225 kg $10a^{-1}$) and Tr.1(1,209 kg $10a^{-1}$) in order. In maize cultivation experiment, Tr.4 was found to be best, showing the yield of 2,142 kg/10a, and followed by Tr.1(2,125 kg $10a^{-1}$), Tr.3(2,024 kg $10a^{-1}$), Tr.5(2,011 kg $10a^{-1}$) and Tr.2(1,925 kg 1$10a^{-1}$) in order. The income was showing 1,274,000 ~ 1,591,000 Won $10a^{-1}$ in barley, whereas 766,000-794,000 Won 1$10a^{-1}$ in maize. There was more economical efficiency in barley cultivation than maize cultivation. Rather than the LPM surface application, LPM soil injection was more effective.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Frost, J.P., R.J. Stevens, R.J. Laughlin. 1990. Effects of separation and acidification of cattle slurry on ammonia volatilisation and on the efficiency of slurry nitrogen for herbage production. J. of agri. sci., Cambrige 115:49-56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600073901
  2. Ishima, T., H. Taira, H. Taira K. Mikoshiba. 1974. Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer and protein content in milled rice on organoleptic quality of cooked rice. Rep. Nat. Food Res. Inst. 29:9-15.
  3. Jeon, W.T., H.M. Park, C.Y. Park, K.D. Park, Y.S. Cho, E.S. Yun, and U.G. Kang. 2003. Effect of liquid pig manure application on rice growth and environment of paddy soil. Korean J. Soc. Soil Sci. Fert. 36:333-343.
  4. Kang, B.G., H.J. Kim, G.J. Lee, and S.G. Park. 2004. Determination of the optimum application rate of pig slurry for red pepper cultivation. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 37:388-395.
  5. Kim, J.K., M.H. Lee, and Y.H. Kim. 1993. Lodging pattern of rice plant in broadcast-seeded and hand transplanted cultivation. Korean J. Crop Sci. 38:219-227.
  6. Lee, J.T., C.J. Lee, and H.D. Kim. 2004. Utilization of liquid pig manure as a substitute for chemical fertilizer in double cropping system of rice followed by onion. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 37:149-155.
  7. Lee, S.T., D.C. Seo, E.S. Kim, W.D. Song, W.G Lee, J.S. Heo, and Y.H. Lee. 2010. Effect of Continual Application of Liquid Pig Manure on Malting Barley Growth and Soil Environment in Double Cropping System of Rice-Malting Barley. Korean J. Soc. Soil Sci. Fert. 43:341-348.
  8. NIAST. 2000. Methods of soil and plant analysis, National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suwon, Korea.
  9. Pain, B.F., R.B. Thompson, Y.J. Rees J.H. Skinner. 1990. Reducing gaseous losses of nitrogen from cattle slurry applied to grassland by the use of additives. J. of Science of Food and Agri, 50:141-153. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740500202
  10. Park, B.K., J.S. Lee, N.J. Cho, and K.Y. Jung. 2001. Effect of liquid pig manure on growth of rice and infiltration water quality. Korean J. Soc. Soil Sci. Fert. 34:153-157.
  11. Park, J.S., W.W. Lee, Y.C. Ju, and Y.H. Kim. 2002. Field lodging degree of rice varieties according to nitrogen application rate. Korean J. Crop Sci. 47:226-235.
  12. Sweeten, J.M. 1988. Composting manure sludge. In National poultry waste management symp., Columbus, OH. Dep. of Poultry Sci., Ohio State Univ., Columbus. p.38-44.
  13. Xie, R., A.F. Mackenzie. 1986. Urea and manure effects on soil nitrogen and corn dry matter yields. Soil Sci Soc. Am. J. 50:1504-1508. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000060025x