DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Light on the Vegetative Growth of Viola rossii, V. japonica, and V. dissecta var. chaerophylloides Populations

고깔제비꽃, 왜제비꽃, 남산제비꽃 집단의 광조건에 따른 영양생장적 특징

  • 임형탁 (전남대학교 자연과학대학 생물학과) ;
  • 홍행화 (전남대학교 자연과학대학 생물학과)
  • Received : 2013.10.11
  • Accepted : 2013.11.13
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

In this study we investigated the relationship between characteristics of vegetative growth of three species of Viola (V. rossii, V. japonica, and V. dissecta var. chaerophylloides) and light in order to explain how these three species could live together under a closed space in a forest. This studywas carried out at five sites in Mudeung-san (Mt.) on 1994, 1995, and 2000 and additional investigations were performed on 2007 and 2010 at the same sites. In order to find the relationship, three main investigations were conducted: counting number of individuals for each investigated year, measuring dry mass and counting developed leaves per plant, and finding presenting patterns of each species with reference to incidence of light. As a result, we found that three species could share the closed space in a forest because of their different adaptive strategies like V. rossii as Kstrategist, V. japonica as r-strategist, and V. dissecta var. chaerophylloides as an intermediator between two species.

임상의 동일 공간에 생육하고 있는 제비꽃속 세 종(고깔제비꽃, 왜제비꽃, 남산제비꽃)의 영양생장적 특징과 광량의 관계를 통해 각 종의 전략자적 특징을 알아보았다. 본 연구는 광주광역시에 위치한 무등산의 다섯개 지점으로부터 1994년, 1995년, 2000년에 중점 조사가 수행되었고, 2007년과 2010년 추가 조사가 진행되었다. 각 종의 집단 내 개체수의 변동, 개체의 건중량과 엽수, 조도에 따른 종의 분포 유형 분석을 통해 세 종이 임상의 광양에 의해 서로 다른 생태적 지위를 얻고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 고깔제비꽃은 K-전략자로서, 왜제비꽃은 r-전략자로서, 남산제비꽃은 두 종의 중간에서 그 생태적 지위를 차지하는 것으로 해석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ataroff M and T Schwarzkopf. 1992. Leaf production, reproductive patterns, field germinaton and seedling survival in Chamaedorea bartlingiana, a dioecious understory palm. Oecologia 92:250-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317372
  2. Borman FH and GE Liekns. 1979. Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem. Springer, New York. pp.264.
  3. Chasdon RL. 1986. Light variation and carbon gain in rain forest understory palms. J. Ecol. 74:995-1012. https://doi.org/10.2307/2260229
  4. Grubb PJ and TC Whitmore. 1966. A comparison of montane and lowland rain forest in Ecuador. II. The climate and its effects on the forest. J. Ecol. 54:303-333. https://doi.org/10.2307/2257951
  5. Han RY. 1994. Effect of light intensity on plant growth in Viola species native to Korea. Thesis. Chungbuk National University. pp.64.
  6. Hori Y, T Yokoi and Y Yokoi. 1995. Effects of light intensity on the size structure and establishment of diploids and triploids of Disporum sessile. Plant Spec. Biol. 10:11-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1995.tb00116.x
  7. Kawana S. 1984. Life Cycle and Evolution-(1)Demography of Grass. Heibonsha. Tokyo. pp.148. (In Japanese)
  8. Kim JW and YK L. 2006. Classification and Assessment of Plant Communities. 240pp.
  9. KMAG. 1994. Monthly Weather Report. Korea Meteorological Administration.
  10. KMAG. 1995. Monthly Weather Report. Korea Meteorological Administration.
  11. KMAG. 2000. Monthly Weather Report. Korea Meteorological Administration.
  12. KMAG. 2007. Monthly Weather Report. Korea Meteorological Administration.
  13. MacArthur RH and EO Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J. 203pp.
  14. Madhav G and WH Bossert. 1970. Life historical consequences of natural selection. Amer. Natur. 104:1-24. https://doi.org/10.1086/282637
  15. Min BY. 2003. Population's limit of Corydalis (Sect. Pes-gallinaceua) group living in the same area. Korean J. Ecol. 26:173-180. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2003.26.4.173
  16. Nakagoshi N. 1992. Ecological study of disturbance of forest. Biology 44:113-127. (In Japanese)
  17. Nakayama S. 1985. Germination traits and reactions against competition in Artemisia-Results from experimental populations-. The Society for the Study of Species Biology IX: 85-108. (In Japanese)
  18. Nault A and D Gagnon. 1993. Ramet demography of Allium tricoccum, a spring ephemeral, perennial forest herb. J. Ecol. 81:101-119. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261228
  19. Pianka ER. 1970. On r- and K-selection. Amer. Natur. 104:592-597. https://doi.org/10.1086/282697
  20. Sandra JN, OT Solbrig and DT Kincaid. 1981. Studies on the population biology of the Genus Viola. III. The demography of Viola blanda and Viola pallens. J. Ecol. 69:997-1016. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259650
  21. Solbrig OT, JN Sandra and DT Kincaid. 1980. The population biology of the genus Viola. I. The demography of Viola sororia. J. Ecol. 68:521-546. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259420
  22. Whittaker RH. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems. 2nd ed. Macmillan, New York. pp.385.
  23. Yamamoto S. 1981. Conservation system of climax forest-the view of Gap dynamics. Biology 33:8-16. (In Japanese)
  24. Yoshino M. 1986. Microclimate. ChijinShokan Co. Tokyo. (In Japanese)