흉부둔상환자에서 인공호흡기 관련 폐렴환자의 임상적 분석

Clinical Analysis of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (VAP) in Blunt-chest-trauma Patients

  • 오중환 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 박일환 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 변천성 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 배금석 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 일반외과학교실)
  • Oh, Joong Hwan (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Il Hwan (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Byun, Chun Sung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Bae, Geum Suk (Department of General Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2013.05.31
  • 심사 : 2013.10.17
  • 발행 : 2013.12.31

초록

Purpose: Prolonged ventilation leads to a higher incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), resulting in weaning failure and increased medical costs. The aim of this study was to analyze clinical results and prognostic factors of VAP in patients with blunt chest trauma. Methods: From 2007 to 2011, one hundred patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours were divided into two groups: a VAP-negative group, (32 patients, mean age; 53 years, M:F=25:7) and a VAP- positive group, (68 patients, mean age; 60 years, M:F=56:12). VAP was diagnosed using clinical symptoms, radiologic findings and microorganisms. The injury severity score (ISS), shock, combined injuries, computerized tomographic pulmonary findings, transfusion, chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), ventilation time, stay in intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, complications such as sepsis or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and microorganisms were analyzed. Chi square, t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression analysies were used with SPSS 18 software. Results: Age, sex, ISS, shock and combined injuries showed no differences between the VAP - negative group and - positive group (p>0.05), but ventilation time, ICU and hospital stays, blood transfusion and complications such as sepsis or DIC showed significant differencies (p<0.05). Four patients(13%) showed no clinical symptoms eventhough blood cultures were positive. Regardless of VAP, mortality-related factors were shock (p=0.036), transfusion (p=0.042), COPD (p=0.029), mechanical ventilation time (p=0.011), ICU stay (p=0.032), and sepsis (p=0.000). Microorgnisms were MRSA(43%), pseudomonas(24%), acinetobacter(16%), streptococcus(9%), klebsiela(4%), staphillococus aureus(4%). However there was no difference in mortality between the two groups. Conclusion: VAP itself was not related with mortality. Consideration of mortality-related factors for VAP and its aggressive treatment play important roles in improving patient outcomes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chastre J, Fagon JY. Ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165: 867-903. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.165.7.2105078
  2. Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP. Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the United States. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 887-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199905000-00020
  3. Jeong HJ, Hyun SY, Kim JJ, Kim JH, Lim YS, Cho JS, et al. Ventilator asociated pneumonia in patients with pulmonary contusion. Korean J Crit Care Med 2010; 25: 224-9. https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2010.25.4.224
  4. Han KN, Choi SH, Kim YC, Lee KH, Lee SE, Jeong KY, et al. Evaluation of lung injury score as a prognostic factor of critical care management in multiple trauma patients with chest injury. J Korean Soc Traumatol 2011; 24: 105-10.
  5. Lillehoj ER, Kim KC. Airway mucus: its components and function. Arch Pharm Res 2002; 25: 770-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02976990
  6. Croce MA, Fabian TC, Waddle-Smith L, Maxwell RA. Identification of early predictors for post-traumatic pneumonia. Am Surg 2001; 67: 105-10.
  7. Croce MA, Tolley EA, Fabian TC. A formula for prediction of posttraumatic pneumonia based on early anatomic and physiologic parameters. J Trauma 2003; 54: 724-9; discussion 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000054643.54218.C5
  8. Tejerina E, Esteban A, Fernandez-Segoviano P, Frutos-Vivar F, Aramburu J, Ballesteros D, et al. Accuracy of clinical definitions of ventilator-associated pneumonia: comparison with autopsy findings. J Crit Care 2009; 25: 62-8.
  9. Medford AR, Husain SA, Turki HM, Millar AB. Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Crit Care 2009; 24: 473 e1- 6.
  10. Rello J, Diaz E, Roque M, Valles J. Risk factors for developing pneumonia within 48 hours of intubation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 1742-6. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.159.6.9808030
  11. Walkey AJ, Reardon CC, Sulis CA, Nace RN, Joyce-Brady M. Epidemiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a long-term acute care hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009; 30: 319-24. https://doi.org/10.1086/596103
  12. Fagon JY, Chastre J, Hance AJ, Guiguet M, Trouillet JL, Domart Y, et al. Detection of nosocomial lung infection in ventilated patients. Use of a protected specimen brush and quantitative culture techniques in 147 patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988; 138: 110-6. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/138.1.110
  13. Pugin J, Auckenthaler R, Mili N, Janssens JP, Lew PD, Suter PM. Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia by bacteriologic analysis of bronchoscopic and nonbronchoscopic "blind" bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 143: 1121-9. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/143.5_Pt_1.1121
  14. Koenig SM, Truwit JD. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006; 19: 637-57. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00051-05
  15. Bouhemad B, Liu ZH, Arbelot C, Zhang M, Ferarri F, Le- Guen M, et al. Ultrasound assessment of antibiotic-induced pulmonary reaeration in ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b08cdb
  16. Lefcoe MS, Fox GA, Leasa DJ, Sparrow RK, McCormack DG. Accuracy of portable chest radiography in the critical care setting. Diagnosis of pneumonia based on quantitative cultures obtained from protected brush catheter. Chest 1994; 105: 885-7. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.105.3.885
  17. Bonten MJ, Bergmans DC, Stobberingh EE, van der Geest S, De Leeuw PW, van Tiel FH, et al. Implementation of bronchoscopic techniques in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia to reduce antibiotic use. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 1820-4. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.156.6.9610117
  18. Zaccard CR, Schell RF, Spiegel CA. Efficacy of bilateral bronchoalveolar lavage for diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47: 2918-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00747-09
  19. Brown DL, Hungness ES, Campbell RS, Luchette FA. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in the surgical intensive care unit. J Trauma 2001; 51: 1207-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200112000-00034
  20. Wood AY, Davit AJ, 2nd, Ciraulo DL, Arp NW, Richart CM, Maxwell RA, et al. A prospective assessment of diagnostic efficacy of blind protective bronchial brushings compared to bronchoscope-assisted lavage, bronchoscope-directed brushings, and blind endotracheal aspirates in ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Trauma 2003; 55: 825-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000090038.26655.88
  21. Fujitani S, Yu VL. Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: focus on nonbronchoscopic techniques (nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage, including mini-BAL, blinded protected specimen brush, and blinded bronchial sampling) and endotracheal aspirates. J Intensive Care Med 2006; 21: 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066605283094
  22. Alvarez-Lerma F. Modification of empiric antibiotic treatment in patients with pneumonia acquired in the intensive care unit. ICU-Acquired Pneumonia Study Group. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22: 387-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01712153
  23. Meduri GU, Mauldin GL, Wunderink RG, Leeper KV, Jr., Jones CB, Tolley E, et al. Causes of fever and pulmonary densities in patients with clinical manifestations of ventilatorassociated pneumonia. Chest 1994; 106: 221-35. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.106.1.221
  24. Fink JB, Krause SA, Barrett L, Schaaff D, Alex CG. Extending ventilator circuit change interval beyond 2 days reduces the likelihood of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest 1998; 113: 405-11. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.113.2.405
  25. Kollef MH, Shapiro SD, Fraser VJ, Silver P, Murphy DM, Trovillion E, et al. Mechanical ventilation with or without 7- day circuit changes. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 168-74. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-123-3-199508010-00002
  26. Guidelines for preventing health-care-associated pneumonia, 2003 recommendations of the CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Respir Care 2004; 49: 926-39.
  27. Rello J, Lorente C, Bodi M, Diaz E, Ricart M, Kollef MH. Why do physicians not follow evidence-based guidelines for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia?: a survey based on the opinions of an international panel of intensivists. Chest 2002; 122: 656-61. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.122.2.656
  28. Lepelletier D, Roquilly A, Demeure dit latte D, Mahe PJ, Loutrel O, Champin P, et al. Retrospective analysis of the risk factors and pathogens associated with early-onset ventilatorassociated pneumonia in surgical-ICU head-trauma patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2010; 22: 32-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181bdf52f
  29. Ryu JH, Yeom SR, Jeong JW, Min MK, Park MR, Kim YI, et al. Correlation between pulmonary contusion and myocardial contusion in patients with multiple injuries. J Korean Soc Traumatol 2011; 24: 31-6.
  30. Rello J, Paiva JA, Baraibar J, Barcenilla F, Bodi M, Castander D, et al. International Conference for the Development of Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia. Chest 2001; 120: 955-70. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.120.3.955
  31. Magret M, Amaya-Villar R, Garnacho J, et al. Ventilatorassociated pneumonia in trauma patients is associated with lower mortality: results from EU-VAP study. J Trauma 2010; 69: 849-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e4d7be