DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정상인 경수에 대한 확산텐서영상과 PC기법을 이용한 뇌척수액 속도 측정에 관한 연구

Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Study of Cine Phase Contrast in Normal Cervical Spinal Cords

  • 손봉경 (인제대학교 의료영상과학) ;
  • 곽소영 (인제대학교 의용공학과, UHRC) ;
  • 한용희 (인제대학교 의용공학과, UHRC) ;
  • 유장선 (양산부산대학교병원 MRI실) ;
  • 김옥화 (인제대학교 해운대백병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 고현윤 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 재활의학교실) ;
  • 문치웅 (인제대학교 의료영상과학)
  • Son, B.K. (Department of Medical Imaging Science, Graduate School Inje University) ;
  • Kwak, S.Y. (Department of Biomedical Engineering, and U-Health care Research Center, Inje University) ;
  • Han, Y.H. (Department of Biomedical Engineering, and U-Health care Research Center, Inje University) ;
  • Yoo, J.S. (Division of MRI, Department of Diganostic Radiology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital) ;
  • Kim, O.H. (Department of Radiology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital) ;
  • Ko, H.Y. (Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Mun, C.W. (Department of Medical Imaging Science, Graduate School Inje University)
  • 투고 : 2013.02.13
  • 심사 : 2013.03.29
  • 발행 : 2013.06.30

초록

목적 : 정상인 경수에 대한 내부 부위별, 경수 레벨별 확산텐서영상과 뇌척수액 속도에 대한 정상인 기준을 마련하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 정상인을 대상으로 3T MRI를 이용하여 영상을 획득하였다. 확산텐서영상은 척수 레벨별로 각각 미리 정의해둔 백질의 후삭, 좌, 우 측삭과 회백질에 관심영역을 정하여 FA, MD에 대한 평균값을 구하였다. PC 기법을 이용한 뇌척수액 속도 측정은 C2-3, C4-5, C5-6 척수레벨을 각각 스캔한 후, 척수 레벨별 최대 수축기 및 이완기 속도를 측정하였다. 결과 : FA 값과 MD 값에서 회백질과 백질의 내부 구조 사이에서는 통계적으로 유의한 차이 (p < 0.05)를 보였다. 경수 레벨별에서는 회백질의 FA 값에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이(p < 0.05)를 보였으며, 나머지 부분에서는 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다 (p > 0.05). 뇌척수액 속도 측정 결과, 평균 최대 수축기 속도 $5.18{\pm}2.00cm/sec$, 평균 최대 이완기 속도 $-7.32{\pm}3.18cm/sec$ 이었으며, 경수 레벨별로는 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다 (p > 0.05). 결론 : 정상인에 대한 경수 확산텐서영상의 정량적 수치 및 경수 레벨에 영향을 받지 않는 뇌척수액 속도에 대한 평균치를 알 수가 있었다.

Purpose : We report the results of the various parameters of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and CSF flow study of the cervical spinal cord using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques. Materials and Methods: Intramedullary FA and MD were measured in the gray matter and posterior cord of the white matter and both lateral cords of the white matter at the C2-3, C4-5, C5-6 spinal levels. For the CSF flow study, velocity encoding was obtained at the C2-3, C4-5, C5-6 spinal levels. Results: There was a significant difference of the FA and MD between the white matter and gray matter (p < 0.05). The FA of the gray matter was significantly different according to the cervical spinal cord levels (p < 0.05). Otherwise, the FA and MD parameters were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The mean peak systolic velocity and mean peak diastolic velocity were $5.18{\pm}2.00cm/sec$ and $-7.32{\pm}3.18cm/sec$, respectively from C2 to C6 spinal cords. There was no significant difference in these velocities among the cervical spinal cord (p > 0.05). Conclusion: This basic information about DTI and CSF dynamics of the cervical spinal cord may be useful for assessing cervical spinal cord abnormalities using MR imaging.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ham KS, Shin MK, Choi HS. Neurophysiology. Hyunmoon, 1997:13-24
  2. Frank H, Netter MD. The CIBA Collection of medical illustrations: volume 1 Nervous system anatomy and physiology. Novartis 2000:23-39
  3. Levitt MA, Flanders AE. Diagnostic capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in acute cervical spinal column injury. Am J Emerg Med 1991;9:131-135 https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-6757(91)90173-H
  4. Renoux J, Facon D, Fillard P, Huynh I, Lasjaunias P, Ducreux D. MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in inflammatory diseases of the spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1947-1951
  5. Ducreux D, Fillard P, Facon D, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging and fiber tracking in spinal cord lesions: current aln future indications. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2007;17:137-147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2006.11.005
  6. Thurnher MM, Law M. Diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography of the spinal cord. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2009;17:255-244
  7. Xiangshui M, Xiangjun C, Xiaoming Z, et al. 3T magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical myelopathy. Clinical Radiology 2010;65:465-473 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2010.01.019
  8. Facon D, Ozanne A, Fillard P, Lepeintre JF, Tournoux-Facon C, Ducreux D. MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in spinal cord compression. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26: 1587-1594
  9. Demir A, Ries M, Moonen CT, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Radiology 2003;229:37-43 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2291020658
  10. Mamata H, Jolesz FA, Maier SE. Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in spinal cord: age and cervical spondylosis-related changes. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:38-43 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20357
  11. Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Magnetic resonance imaging. Ilchokak, 2008:173-179
  12. Bhadelia RA, Frederick E, Patz S, et al. Cough-associated headache in patients with Chiari I malformation: CSF flow analysis by means of cine phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:739-742 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2369
  13. Hofmann E, Warmuth-Metz M, Bendszus M, Solymosi L. Phasecontast MR imaging of the cervical CSF and spinal cord: volumetric motion analysis in patients with Chiari I malformation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:151-158
  14. Song KY, Ha YI, Kang DS et al. Clinical applications of cine MR. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 1998;27:808-814
  15. Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Hickman SJ, Parker GJ, et al. Investingating cervical spinal cord structure using axial diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2002;16:93-102 https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1022
  16. Cerciqnani M, Horsfield M, Agosta F, Filippi M. Sensitivityencoded diffusion tensor MR imaging of the cervical cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1254-1256
  17. Struck AF, Haughton VM. Idiopathic syringomyelia: phase contrast MR of cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics at level of framen magnum. Radiology 2009;253:184-190 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2531082135
  18. Vargas MI, Delavelle J, Jlassi H, et al. Clinical applications of diffusion tensor tractography of the spinal cord. Neuroradiology 2008;50:25-29 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0309-y
  19. Lee JW, Kim JH, Park JB, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography in cervical compressive myelopathy: preliminary results. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40:1543-1551 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1161-z