Korean Circulation Journal

The Korean Society of Cardiology (대한심장학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Maximal Exercise-Corrected QT as a Predictor of Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison of Simpler Heart Rate Corrections

  • Akyuz, Aydin (Department of Cardiology, Namik Kemal University Medical School) ;
  • Alpsoy, Seref (Department of Cardiology, Namik Kemal University Medical School) ;
  • Akkoyun, Dursun Cayan (Department of Cardiology, Namik Kemal University Medical School) ;
  • Degirmenci, Hasan (Department of Cardiology, Namik Kemal University Medical School) ;
  • Guler, Niyazi (Department of Cardiology, Namik Kemal University Medical School)
  • Published : 2013.10.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The relationship between QT prolongation and myocardial ischemia is widely known. Due to the limited value of ST depression, we aimed to evaluate, by using four simpler heart rate corrections (Bazett, Framingham, Fridericia and Hodges), the value of maximal exercise-QTc prolongation in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) presence and severity. Subjects and Methods: We enrolled 234 subjects (mean age$57.3{\pm}9$ years, 143 men) who had undergone exercise testing and coronary angiography due to a suspicion of CAD in the study. Evaluating CAD severity with Gensini scoring, the CAD group (n=122) and controls with non-CAD were compared in terms of corrected QT duration at maximal exercise. Results: Age, gender, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, exercise duration, resting, and peak heart rate were similar between the two groups (all p>0.05). The CAD group had higher raw QT values than the controls {268 (169-438) vs. 240 (168-348), p<0.001}. Although Framingham QTc of ${\geq}350$ ms and Fridericia QTc of ${\geq}340$ ms were seen to be useful for the diagnosis of CAD, there was no additive diagnostic value of exercise QTc in addition to ST depression. Maximal exercise-QTc Bazett (r=0.163, p=0.01), Framingham (r=0.239, p=0.001), and Fridericia (r=0.206, p=0.001) equations were weakly positively correlated with Gensini scoring. Conclusion: The patients with CAD have longer QTc intervals at peak heart rates during exercise. This finding provides insufficient evidence to support routine incorporation of QTc at peak heart rates into exercise test interpretation.

Keywords

References

  1. Crow RS, Hannan PJ, Folsom AR. Prognostic significance of corrected QT and corrected JT interval for incident coronary heart disease in a general population sample stratified by presence or absence of wide QRS complex: the ARIC Study with 13 years of follow-up. Circulation 2003;108:1985-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000095027.28753.9D
  2. Rickards AF, Norman J. Relation between QT interval and heart rate. New design of physiologically adaptive cardiac pacemaker. Br Heart J 1981;45:56-61. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.45.1.56
  3. Davey P, Bateman J. Heart rate and catecholamine contribution to QT interval shortening on exercise. Clin Cardiol 1999;22:513-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960220805
  4. Schijvenaars BJ, van Herpen G, Kors JA. Intraindividual variability in electrocardiograms. J Electrocardiol 2008;41:190-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.01.012
  5. Sohaib SM, Papacosta O, Morris RW, Macfarlane PW, Whincup PH. Length of the QT interval: determinants and prognostic implications in a population-based prospective study of older men. J Electrocardiol 2008;41:704-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.01.010
  6. Bazett HC. An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms. Heart 1920;7:353-70.
  7. Fridericia LS. Die systolendauer im elektrokardiogramm bei normalen menschen und bei herzkranken. Acta Med Scan 1920;53:469-86.
  8. Hodges M, Salerno D, Erlinen D. Bazett' QT correction reviewed-Evidence that a linear QT correctionfor heart is better. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;12:694.
  9. Sagie A, Larson MG, Goldberg RJ, Bengtson JR, Levy D. An improved method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 1992;70:797-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(92)90562-D
  10. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:982-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.014
  11. Miranda CP, Liu J, Kadar A, et al. Usefulness of exercise-induced ST-segment depression in the inferior leads during exercise testing as a marker for coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:303-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(92)90224-M
  12. Takase B, Masaki N, Hattori H, Ishihara M, Kurita A. Usefulness of automatic QT dispersion measurement for detecting exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2009;9:189-95.
  13. Ulgen MS, Karadede A, Alan S, Temamogulari AV, Karabulut A, Toprak N. Contribution of the peak exercise QT dispersion to the accuracy of an exercise test during the evaluation of coronary artery disease. Acta Cardiol 2000;55:335-9. https://doi.org/10.2143/AC.55.6.2005764
  14. Chugh SS, Reinier K, Singh T, et al. Determinants of prolonged QT interval and their contribution to sudden death risk in coronary artery disease: the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study. Circulation 2009;119:663-70. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.797035
  15. Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Zareba W. QT interval: how to measure it and what is "normal". J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2006;17:333-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00408.x
  16. Gensini GG. A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:606. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(83)80105-2
  17. Gianrossi R, Detrano R, Mulvihill D, et al. Exercise-induced ST depression in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis. Circulation 1989;80:87-98. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.80.1.87
  18. Aytemir K, Maarouf N, Gallagher MM, Yap YG, Waktare JE, Malik M. Comparison of formulae for heart rate correction of QT interval in exercise electrocardiograms. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999;22:1397-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00635.x
  19. Luo S, Michler K, Johnston P, Macfarlane PW. A comparison of commonly used QT correction formulae: the effect of heart rate on the QTc of normal ECGs. J Electrocardiol 2004;37 Suppl:81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2004.08.030
  20. Rautaharju PM, Zhang ZM. Linearly scaled, rate-invariant normal limits for QT interval: eight decades of incorrect application of power functions. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2002;13:1211-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.01211.x
  21. Chauhan VS, Krahn AD, Mitoff P, Klein GJ, Skanes AC, Yee R. Sudden intense exercise increases QT heart rate slope and T wave complexity in long QT syndrome and normal subjects. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:1415-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00647.x
  22. Kannankeril PJ, Goldberger JJ. Parasympathetic effects on cardiac electrophysiology during exercise and recovery. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002;282:H2091-8. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00825.2001
  23. Mittleman MA, Siscovick DS. Physical exertion as a trigger of myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death. Cardiol Clin 1996;14:263-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8651(05)70279-4
  24. Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Spazzolini C, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation in the long-QT syndrome: gene-specific triggers for life-threatening arrhythmias. Circulation 2001;103:89-95. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.103.1.89
  25. Hirao H, Shimizu W, Kurita T, et al. Frequency-dependent electrophysiologic properties of ventricular repolarization in patients with congenital long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1269-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00313-0
  26. Shaw RM, Rudy Y. Electrophysiologic effects of acute myocardial ischemia: a theoretical study of altered cell excitability and action potential duration. Cardiovasc Res 1997;35:256-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6363(97)00093-X
  27. Lauer MS, Pothier CE, Chernyak YB, et al. Exercise-induced QT/R-R-interval hysteresis as a predictor of myocardial ischemia. J Electrocardiol 2006;39:315-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.12.005
  28. Malik M. Problems of heart rate correction in assessment of drug-induced QT interval prolongation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001;12:411-20. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00411.x
  29. Magnano AR, Holleran S, Ramakrishnan R, Reiffel JA, Bloomfield DM. Autonomic nervous system influences on QT interval in normal subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1820-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01852-1
  30. Arrowood JA, Kline J, Simpson PM, et al. Modulation of the QT interval: effects of graded exercise and reflex cardiovascular stimulation. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1993;75:2217-23. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1993.75.5.2217

Cited by

  1. Simple heart rate and QT parameters during stress exercise testing to assess presence and severity of stable coronary artery disease vol.17, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2217/fca-2020-0163
  2. Can QT dispersion improve the accuracy of stress ECG TMT in detecting myocardial ischemia in chronic stable CAD patients? A stress myocardial perfusion imaging study vol.73, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-020-00126-5