DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Information System Architecture for Extracting Key Performance Indicators from PDM Databases

PDM 데이터베이스로부터 핵심성과지표를 추출하기 위한 정보 시스템 아키텍쳐

  • Do, Namchul (Dep. of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, ERI)
  • 도남철 (경상대학교 산업시스템공학부, 공학연구원)
  • Received : 2012.08.09
  • Accepted : 2012.12.04
  • Published : 2013.02.15

Abstract

The current manufacturers have generated tremendous amount of digitized product data to efficiently share and exchange it with other stakeholders or various software systems for product development. The digitized product data is a valuable asset for manufacturers, and has a potential to support high level strategic decision makings needed at many stages in product development. However, the lack of studies on extraction of key performance indicators(KPIs) from product data management(PDM) databases has prohibited manufacturers to use the product data to support the decision makings. Therefore this paper examines a possibility of an architecture that supports KPIs for evaluation of product development performances, by applying multidimensional product data model and on-line analytic processing(OLAP) to operational databases of product data management. To validate the architecture, the paper provides a prototype product data management system and OLAP applications that implement the multidimensional product data model and analytic processing.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed, Z. (2009), PDM based I-SOAS Data Warehouse Design, proc. 5th International Statistical Conference, 17, 23-25.
  2. Ahmed, Z. (2011), Designing Knowledge Base Towards PDMS, International Journal of Information Technology and Engineering, 2(1), 9-12.
  3. Alemanni, M., Alessia, G., Tornincasa, S. and Vezzetti, E. (2008), Key performance indicators for PLM benefits evaluation : The Alcatel Alenia Space case study, Computers in Industry, 59, 833-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2008.06.003
  4. Cheng, Y.-T., Chou, H.-H. and Cheng, C.-H. (2011), Extracting key performance indicators (KPIs) new product development using mind map and Decision-Making and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) methods, African Journal of Business Management, 5(26), 10734- 10746.
  5. Do, N. (2007), Introduction to PLM and Its Applications, Saengreung Press, Seoul Korea.
  6. Do, N. (2012), A PLM Introductory Program-KEDB TEE, PLM Best Practice Conference, 21th June, Seoul Korea.
  7. Han, J. and Kamber, M. (2001), Data Mining Concepts and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann.
  8. MAS-WM (2012), MAS-WM New Product Development (NPD) Gateway, http://www.mas-wm.org/.
  9. MySQL (2012) MySQL, http://www.mysql.com.
  10. Oh, J. and Yang, J. (2010), A Case Study of Implementation of a BSC Performance Evaluation System in Manufacturing Industry based on Product Data Management, IE Interfaces, 23(4), 275-285.
  11. Tan, O. K. and Rasli A. (2011), Prediction of New Product Development (NPD) Performance in Research and Development (R&D) Company, 3rd International Conference on Advanced Management Science IPEDR, Singapore, 19, 192-200.
  12. Tatikonda, M. V. (2007), Product Development Performance Measurement, chapter in The Handbook of New Product Development, edited by Loch, C. and Kavadias. S., Elesevier Publishers, London, United Kingdom.
  13. Yan, W., Chen, C.-H., Huang, Y., and Mi, W. (2009), A data-mining approach for product conceptualization in a web-based architecture, Computers in Industry, 60, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2008.09.003

Cited by

  1. Review and Perspectives on the Research and Industrial Applications of Manufacturing Systems Engineering in Korea for 40 Years vol.40, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2014.40.6.555