Multidisciplinary Team Research as an Innovation Engine in Knowledge-Based Transition Economies and Implication for Asian Countries -From the Perspective of the Science of Team Science

  • Lee, Yong-Gil (Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Inha University)
  • Published : 2013.05.31


This work identifies the key factors influencing the success of multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and trans-disciplinary R&D projects in transition economies by integrating knowledge management, organizational, inter/intra-collaboration (open-innovation), and leadership perspectives, while also addressing the perspective of the science of team science, which is an integrative approach to R&D. This is followed by providing the major sub-constructs of team science and policy implications to better facilitate multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary R&D projects in knowledge-based transition economies.



  1. Argyris, C. (1994). Good Communication That Blocks Learning. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 77-85.
  2. Bettencourt, L. A., A. W. Ulwick (2008). The Customer-Centered Innovation Map. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 109-114.
  3. Cohn, J., J. Katzenbach, and G. Valk (2008). Finding and Grooming Breakthrough Innovators. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 63-69.
  4. Collins, J. (2005). Level 5 leadership: The triumph of humility and fierce resolve. Harvard Business Review, 83(7), 136-143.
  5. Dzisah, J. & Henry Etzkowitz (2009). Triple Helix Circulation: The Heart of Innovation and Development. The 7th Triple Helix conference theme paper, pp. 1-19. Glasgow, 17-19 June.
  6. Ericsson, K. A., M. J. Prietula, E. T. Cokely (2007). The Making of an Expert. Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 115-121.
  7. Eckert, R. A. (2001). Where Leadership Starts. Harvard Business Review, 79(10), 53-61.
  8. Faems, D., B. Van Looy, K. Debackere (2005). Interorganizational Collaboration and Innovation: Toward a Portfolio Approach. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 238-250.
  9. Gabriel, I. (1999). Giving meaning to work: the spiritual challenge of our time. The Third Inter-national Symposium on Catholic Social Thought and Management Education, Rethinking the Spiritual and Social Life within Business, International Centre, Dona Paula, Goa, India, January 10-12, pp.1-8.
  10. Garnier, J.-P. (2008). Rebuilding the R&D Engine in Big Pharma. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 69-76.
  11. Goffee, R & Gareth Jones (2000). Why Should Anyone Be Led by You. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 62-70.
  12. Goleman, D. (1998). What Makes a Leader? Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 93-102.
  13. Gray, B. (2008). Enhancing Transdisciplinary Research Through Collaborative Leadership. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2S), S124 - S132.
  14. Hansen, M. T., J. Birkinshaw (2007). The Innovation Value Chain. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 121-130.
  15. Heifetz, R. A. & Marty Linsky (2002). A Survival Guide for Leaders. Harvard Business Review, 80(6), 65-74.
  16. Huang, J. C., S. Newell (2003). Knowledge integration processes and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 167-176.
  17. Huckman, R. S. (2009). Are You Having Trouble Keeping Your Operations Focused? Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 91-95.
  18. Jones, B. F., S. Wuchty, B. Uzzi (2008). Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science. Science, 322, 1259-1262.
  19. Jouret, G. (2009). Inside Cisco's Search for the Next Big Idea. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 43-45.
  20. Katila, R., G. Ahuja (2002). Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
  21. Kim, W.C., R. Mauborgne (2009). How Strategy Shapes Structure. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 73-80.
  22. Koput K. W. (1997). A Chaotic Model of Innovative Search: Some Answers, Many Questions. Organization Science, 8(5) 528-542.
  23. Kotter, J. P. (1990). What Leaders Really Do. Harvard Business Review, 79(11): 85-96.
  24. Laursen, K., A. Salter (2006). Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131-150.
  25. Lee, K. & C. Lim (2001). Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy, 30(3), 459-483.
  26. Lee, Y.-G. (2012). Strengthening Competency Linkage to Innovation at Korean Universities, Scientomertics, 90(1), 219-230.
  27. Lee, Y.-G., J.-H. Lee (2010). Different characteristics between auctioned and non-auctioned patents, Scientometrics, 82(1), 135-148.
  28. Lee, Y.-G. (2010). Sectoral strategic differences of technological development between electronics and chemistry: A historical view from analyses of Korean-invented US patents during the period of 1989 to 1992, Scientometrics, 82(1), 83-92.
  29. Lee, Y.-G., S. Park, Y. Song (2009). Which is Better for a Firm's Financial Performance: An Externally Oriented or Inwardly Oriented Innovation Strategy? An Empirical Study of Korean SMEs. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 17 (1), 57-73.
  30. Lee, Y.-G. (2009). What Affects a Patent's Value? An Analysis of Variables That Affect Technological, Direct Economic, and Indirect Economic Value: An Exploratory Conceptual Approach. Scientometrics, 79 (3), 623-633.
  31. Lee, Y.-G., J. Lee, Y. Song, H. Kim (2008). Technological convergence and open innovation in the mobile telecommunications industry. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 16 (1), 45-62.
  32. Masse, L. C., R. P. Moser, D. Stokols, B. K. Taylor, S. E. Marcus, G. D. Morgan, K. L. Hall, R. T. Groyle, W. M. Trochim (2008). Measuring Collaboration and Transdisciplinary Integration in Team Science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2S), S151 - S160.
  33. Mintzberg, H. (1990). The Manager's Job- Folklore and Fact. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 163-176.
  34. Mintzberg, H. (2007). Productivity Is Killing American Enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 25.
  35. Mizik, N., R. Jacobson (2007). The Cost of Myopic Management. Harvard Business Review, 85(7/8), 22-24.
  36. Nambisan, S., M. Sawhney (2007). A Buyer's Guide to the Innovation Bazaar. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 109-118.
  37. Nidumolu, R., C. K. Prahalad, M. R. Rangawami (2009). Why Sustainability Is Now The Key Driver of Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 57-64.
  38. Park, S.-h., Y.-G. Lee (2011). Perspectives on Technology Transfer Strategies of Korean Companies in Point of Resource and Capability Based View, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 6(1), 161-184.
  39. Peace, W. H. (1991). The Hard Work of Being a Soft Manager. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 40-44.
  40. Peters, T. J. (1979). Leadership: Sad Facts and Silver Linings. Harvard Business Review, 57(6), 164-172.
  41. Porth, S. J., J. McCall (1999). Contemporary Management Theories and Catholic Social Teaching: A Review and Analysis. The Third International Symposium on Catholic Social Thought and Management Education, Rethinking the Spiritual and Social Life within Business, International Centre, Dona Paula, Goa, India, January 10-12, pp.1-15.
  42. Sengupta, K., T. K. Abdel-Hamid, L. K. Van Wassenhove (2008). The Experience Trap. Harvard Business Review, 86(2), 94-101.
  43. Song, Y., D. Lee, Y.-G. Lee, Y. Chung (2007). Managing uncertainty and ambiguity in frontier R&D projects: A Korean case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(3), 231-250.
  44. Sorcher, M., Brant, J. (2002). Are You Picking the Right Leaders? Harvard Business Review, 80(2), 78-85.
  45. Stokols, D., S. Misra, R. P. Moser, K. L. Hall, B. K. Taylor (2008). The Ecology of Team Science: Understanding Contextual Influences on Transdisciplinary Collaboration. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2S), S96 - S115.
  46. Takeuchi, H., E. Osono, and N. Shimizu (2008). The Contradictions That Drive Toyota's Success. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 96-104.
  47. Teasley, S., S. Wolinsky (2001). Scientific Collaborations at a Distance. Science, 292(5525), 2254-2255.
  48. Tripsas, M. (1997). Unraveling the Process of Creative Destruction: Complementary Asset and Incumbent Survival in the Typesetter Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 119-142.<119::AID-SMJ921>3.3.CO;2-S
  49. Zahra, S. A., A. P. Nielsen (2002). Sources of Capabilities, Integration and Technology Commercialization. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 377-398.
  50. Zaleznik, A. (1992). Managers and Leaders: Are They Different? Harvard Business Review, 70(2), 126-135.

Cited by

  1. Measuring the dynamics of an innovation system using patent data: a case study of South Korea, 2001–2010 vol.49, pp.4, 2015,
  2. Factors affecting citation networks in science and technology: focused on non-quality factors vol.49, pp.4, 2015,
  3. A semantic annotation framework for scientific publications vol.51, pp.3, 2017,
  4. Knowledge flow in China’s humanities and social sciences pp.1573-7845, 2018,