DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

신규 여성 박사들의 경력개발에 관한 탐색적 연구 -교육계열 전공자를 중심으로

Explore Career Development of Female Recently Obtained Doctoral Degree in Education

  • 김효선 (이화여자대학교 경영대학 국제사무학과)
  • Kim, Hyosun (Dept. of International Office Administration, College of Business, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2013.10.05
  • 심사 : 2013.12.20
  • 발행 : 2013.12.28

초록

본 연구는 우리나라 교육계열 전공 여성 박사의 학교와 직장의 진로성취과정에서 겪는 진로개발 및 진로장애를 탐색하는데 그 목적이 있다. 연구의 목적을 수행하기 위하여 최근 5년 이내의 교육계열 전공 여성 박사 42명을 대상으로 질적 연구를 진행하였다. 그 결과 교육계열 여성 박사들은 교수와의 학술활동을 통해서 자신의 진로개발에 영향을 가장 많이 받고 있었으며 둘째, 직장 내에서 유리창효과를 경험한 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 결혼이라는 것이 기혼 및 미혼 여성 박사 모두 진로개발 시 장애요인이라고 인식했다. 기혼은 자신의 가정과 육아에 대한 책임감과 미혼은 유교적 가치관 속에서 사회적 약자로 인식하고 있었다. 이러한 다양한 경험들은 여성 박사들에게 진로개발을 저해하는 요인으로 나타났지만 주변인의 지지와 자신의 자아실현에 대한 강한 목표의식은 진로장벽을 타계하는 방편으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 여성 박사의 진로개발에는 다양한 관점에서의 맥락이 여성의 진로개발에 영향을 주는 것으로 발견되었다. 여성 박사를 위한 진로지도는 학생들의 요구와 사회 변화에 따라 유동적이고 다각적인 방향에서 접근 하는 것이 필요하다.

The purpose of the present study is to explore the career development barriers of female doctoral degree holders in education. The study occupied in-depth interview with 42 female doctoral degree holders in education. The results were as followed; First, academic advisor highly influenced the career development female doctoral degree holders through their academic activities. Second, they had experiences regarding glass ceiling effect in workplace. Third, marriage was a critical issue for both of the married and single female doctoral degree holders. Fourth, family and relatives' support positively impact on their career will, and also their strong career goal was beneficial way to break their career barriers. Also, the study suggested contextural factor was very significant on career behavior of female doctoral degree holders. Therefore, policy maker, scholars, and students should have strong attention to female students' career guidance and development in various way. The results of the study discussed in relation to the existing literature, with reference to women's career development and career barriers, and then implication for the future research were suggested.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H. W., Ko, An analysis of labour participation status of Korean highly-educated women. Women Human Resource Research, Vol. 2, pp. 35-70, 2008.
  2. S. Kawk, Research methods on female adult education. The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 323-340, 1999.
  3. Y. Kim, Need analysis for the career building and reemployment plans of career interrupted, Highly Educated Women. Women's Studies Forum, Vol. 73, pp. 85-118, 2007.
  4. Y. S., Kim, Patriarchal construction and aspects of Korean colonial modernity seen through discourses on marriage and family. Women & History, Vol. 13, pp. 131-172, 2010.
  5. J. Kim & H. Chun, The career development of high degreed working women. The Journal of Humanities, Vo. 11, no. 2, 283-301, 2006.
  6. J. Kim & K. Kim, Experiences of female doctorate holders in the faculty job market and strategies to address the obstacles . The Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 13, no. 3 pp. 109-132, 2003.
  7. S. H. Son & Y. M. Lee, The phenomenological study Of middle and small firm human resource development managers' perception on reemployment of college degree earned women experiencing career discontinuity. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, Vol. 16, no.4, pp. 121-139, 2009.
  8. H. Song, Introductory of female education. Seoul: Kyoyookbook, 2009.
  9. S. Shin, J., Kim, & H. Lim, Mismatch among female Ph.D. holders. Korea Institute for Women Development, 2010.
  10. S. Ho & M. Moon, Comprehensive management strategies on government. Ministry of Gender Equality & Family, 2009.
  11. H. Yoon, An analysis on vocational exploration experiences of highly educated middle-aged women with discontinued employment. Journal of Lifelong Education, Vol. 14, no. 1, 83-112, 2008.
  12. S. Lee, M. Jin, Y. Lee, An analysis on Korean women's U.S. Ph.D. degree-seeking process and career development in the field of science and engineering. Korean Science Education Research, Vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 395-408, 2008.
  13. I. Lee, I., Kang, & Y. Cho, A study on effective reemployment policy support of highly-educated career-interrupted women for the companies of Seoul metropolitan government. National Policy Research, Vol. 26, no.1, pp. 127-157, 2012.
  14. J. Lim, The effects of women's investment in higher education on their labor income. Ph.D. dissertation, Yonsei University, 2010.
  15. S. Chung & S. Ahn, The development and effectiveness of the program to assist highly-educated reentry women to labor market. Andragogy Today, Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 25-46, 2007.
  16. T. J. Sung and K. Si, Research methods. Seoul, Hakjisa, 2010.
  17. M. Chin, S. Lee, H. Yoon, N. Kim, & H. Oh, Understanding Korean brain drain by comparison of employment situation between returned Ph.Ds and non-returned Ph.Ds with US higher Education degree in science and engineer. KRIVET, 2006.
  18. Y. Choi & K. Kim, Concept mapping the highly educated and married women's experience on crisis of career interruption -for comparing career women with housewives had experienced career interruption-. Korean Journal of Counseling, Vol. 8, no. 3, 1031-1045, 2007. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.8.3.200709.1031
  19. KEDI(2000). Annual Statistics of Education. http://cesi.kedi.re.kr/
  20. KEDI(2005). Annual Statistics of Education. http://cesi.kedi.re.kr/
  21. KEDI(2010). Annual Statistics of Education. http://cesi.kedi.re.kr/
  22. KEDI(2011). Annual Statistics of Education. http://cesi.kedi.re.kr/
  23. KEDI(2012). Annual Statistics of Education. http://cesi.kedi.re.kr/
  24. A. Autin, Preparing the next generation of faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 73, no.1, pp. 94-122, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2002.0001
  25. O. Bain & W. Cummings, Organizational, and institutional barriers to the career advancement of academic women, Comparative Education, Vol., 44, no. 4, pp. 493-513, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1086/447631
  26. P. Bronstein & L. Black, Stepping onto the academic career ladder: how are women doing. Women's career development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1986.
  27. E. Cook, P. Hepper, & O'Brien, Career development of women of color and white women: assumptions, conceptualization, and interventions from an ecological perspective. The Career Development Quarterly, Vol. 50, pp. 291-305, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2002.tb00574.x
  28. I. Gilberr, & I. Kearney, Sex, gender, and dual-learner families: implication and applications for career counseling for women. In Walsh & Hepper(Ed.) Handbook of career counseling for women. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 2006.
  29. C. Hasse, Gender diversity in play with physics: the problem of premises for participation in activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 250-269, 2009.
  30. H. Hatchell, & N. Aveling, Those same old prejudices. gendered experiences in the science workplace. Journal of Workplace Rights, Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 355-375, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2190/WR.13.4.b
  31. Lent (2005). A social cognitive view of career development and counseling. Career development and counseling(Brown, S. D. & Lent, R. W. Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2005.
  32. R. Lent, S. Brown, J. Schmidt, B. Brenner, H. Lyons, & D. Treistman, Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 458-465. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.50.4.458, 2003.
  33. W. Mau, & L. Bikos,. Educational and vocational aspirations of minority and female students: a longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling & Development, Vol. 78, pp. 186-194, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2000.tb02577.x
  34. C. Morgan, D. Isaac, & C. Sansone, The role of interest in understanding the career choices of female and male college students. Sex Roles, Vol. 44, pp. 295-320, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010929600004
  35. D. Neumark & R. Gardecki, Women helping women. role model and mentoring effects on female Ph.D. students in economics. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1996.
  36. OECD, Education at a glance 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2013-en, 2013
  37. OECD, Gender and sustainable development: maximising the economic, social and environmental role of women. http://www.oecd.org/social/40881538.pdf, 2008.
  38. C. Seierstad, & G. Healy, Women's equality in the Scandinavian academy: a distant dream. Work Employment & Society, Vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 296-313, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017011432918
  39. E. Yeagley, L. Subich, & D. Tokar, Modeling college women's perceptions of elite leadership positions with Social Cognitive Career Theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 30-38, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.02.003
  40. A. Zalevski & L. Swiszczowski, Gender and attitudes to enterprise: survey of UK doctorate students in science, engineering and technology. Equal Opportunities International, Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 65-79, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150910933640