Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회지)

Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study of relationship among the Brain Dominance Thinking Types and Self Leadership of engineering students

공과대학생의 두뇌우성 사고유형과 셀프리더십과의 관계 연구

  • Kim, Yeon-Hee (Dept. of Safety Health Engineering, Hoseo University) ;
  • Sun, Bok-Keon (Innovation Center for Engineering Education(ICEE), Hoseo University)
  • 김연희 (호서대학교 안전보건학과) ;
  • 선복근 (호서대학교 공학교육혁신센터)
  • Received : 2013.10.20
  • Accepted : 2013.12.05
  • Published : 2013.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identity the relationships of sub factor among the brain dominance thinking types(A,B,C,D quadrant thinking type) is based on the Whole Brain Modal and self-leadership by Manz. The subjects were 102 undergraduates students from the Hoseo university in Cheonan. The results of this study as follows ; first, the brain dominance thinking type A was the highest and type C was highly rated. Second, the brain dominance thinking type A was not correlated type C and type D. Third, the brain dominance thinking type C and self-leadership sub factor was significantly positively correlated.

Keywords

References

  1. Bark GI Moon (2010). A Study On The Correlation Between Attitude Toward Engineering Science And Academic Accomplishment According To Brain Dominance Thinking of Students In the Department of Engineering, The Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Education, 7(2) : 124-139
  2. Song Jung Su.Yang Pill Suck(2008). A Study on Mediating Effects of Organizational Commitment on the Relationships between self-Leadership and Innovative Behavior. Korean Corporation Management Associator, 15(1) : 189-209
  3. Lee Yoong gu.Jung Suck Whan(2007). An analysis of determinants of organizational effectiveness : a comparative analysis between public and private organizations, Governmental Studies, 13(1) : 7-34
  4. Kim Min Jung(2007). An analysis of determinants of organizational effectiveness : a comparative analysis between public and private organizations. Ewha Womans Universty, 2-3
  5. Valenti, M. (1996). Teaching Tomorrow's Engineers. Mechanical Engineering, 118(7), 64-69
  6. Cassidy, J. E. (1998). From Half-brain to Whole-brain: Learn to Create High Performing Teams, ASQ's 52nd Annual Quality Congress Proceedings. pp. 725-735
  7. Herrmann, N. (1996). The Whole Brain Business Book. McGraw-Hill.
  8. Manz. C. C & Sims, H. P. Jr. (1986) Leading self-management groups: a conceptual analysis of a paradox. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 7, 141-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X8672002
  9. Manz, C, C., & Neck, C. P. (1999). Mastering Self-Leadership: Empowering youself for personal excellence. 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  10. Uoo Ri Na(2009). Relationship between the Brain Dominance Thinking Type and the Technological Problem Solving Style for Middle School Student. Chung Nam Univ. 29-30