Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회지)

Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Complex Characterization Analysis of the Risk Awareness Affecting an Accident Experience of Quick Service Workers

퀵서비스 종사자의 사고 경험에 영향을 미치는 안전의식의 복합적 특성 분석

  • Rhee, Kyung Yong (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, KOSHA) ;
  • Ahn, Sang Hyun (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, KOSHA) ;
  • Kim, Ki Sik (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, KOSHA)
  • 이경용 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 안상현 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 김기식 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원)
  • Received : 2013.10.20
  • Accepted : 2013.12.04
  • Published : 2013.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of risk awareness on injury experience in quick delivery service workers. Risk awareness has complicate characteristics such as its level of worker and worker's decision about the level of other's risk perception. Data were collected by interview survey with structured questionnaire about injury experience, risk perception, work characteristics, and socio-demographic characteristics of quick delivery service workers by cross sectional survey design in 2012. The sample size was 120 respondent of quick delivery service workers. Statistical method for this study was hierarchical logistic regression method with 3 different models using socio-demographic characteristics and work characteristics and risk perception, etc. The difference between the level of risk perception of quick delivery service and other's was statistically significant effect on the experience of injury. Especially the higher the level of risk perception of quick delivery service workers is than other's, the lower the injury experience of quick delivery service worker is. The limitation of this study can be found in survey design. The future study for investigation of mechanism of the combined effect of risk perception of quick delivery service workers and others on injury experience.

Keywords

References

  1. Cooper, M. D. (2000). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science, 36(2), 111-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00035-7
  2. Cooper, M., and Phillips, R. (2004). Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. Journal of Safety Research 35(5), 497-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2004.08.004
  3. Flin, R., Mearns, K., O'Connor, P., and Bryden, R. (1998). Measuring safety climate: Identifying the common features. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 177-192.
  4. Gibbons, A., von Thaden, T. and Wiegmann, D. (2006) Development and initial validation of a survey for assessing safety culture within commercial flight operations. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 16 (2), NJ: LEA.
  5. Glendon, A.I., and Stanton, N.A. (2000). Perspectives on safety culture. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 193-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00013-8
  6. Neal, A., and Griffin, M.A. (2002). Safety Climate and Safety Behaviour. Australian Journal of Management, 27, 67-75 https://doi.org/10.1177/031289620202701S08
  7. Park, N.S., and Kang, H.J, (2009). Emotion, Cognition and Behavior Responses of the Drivers in Dangerous Driving Scenario. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Health, 14(2), 403-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105309102193
  8. Schomig, N and Metz B.(2013). Three levels of situation awareness in driving with secondary tasks. Safety Science 56(2013), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.029
  9. Simon, H.(1990). A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. Science 250(4988):1665-1668. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2270480
  10. Simon, H.(1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organizational Science 2(1):125-134. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.125
  11. PASW Statistics 18(Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc., 2009).
  12. Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96
  13. Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 587-596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.587
  14. Zohar, D., and Luria, G. (2003). The use of supervisory practices as leverage to improve safety behavior: A cross-level intervention model. Journal of Safety Research, 34(5), 567-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2003.05.006

Cited by

  1. 어린이집 통학버스 운전자의 유형에 따른 안전의식에 관한 비교연구 vol.14, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2014.14.11.249
  2. 고령 운전자의 안전의식에 관한 실증적 연구 : 영업용과 비영업용 운전자 비교를 중심으로 vol.15, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2015.15.09.223