Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (아시아태평양암예방학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical Risk Factor Analysis for Breast Cancer: 568,000 Subjects Undergoing Breast Cancer Screening in Beijing, 2009

  • Pan, Lei (Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University) ;
  • Han, Li-Li (Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital) ;
  • Tao, Li-Xin (Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University) ;
  • Zhou, Tao (Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University) ;
  • Li, Xia (Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University) ;
  • Gao, Qi (Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University) ;
  • Wu, Li-Juan (Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University) ;
  • Luo, Yan-Xia (Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University) ;
  • Ding, Hui (Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital) ;
  • Guo, Xiu-Hua (Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University)
  • Published : 2013.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Although there are many reports about the risk of breast cancer, few have reported clinical factors including history of breast-related or other diseases that affect the prevalence of breast cancer. This study explores these risk factors for breast cancer cases reported in Beijing in 2009. Materials and Methods: Data were derived from a Beijing breast cancer screening performed in 2009, of 568,000 women, from 16 districts of Beijing, all aged between 40 and 60 years. In this study, multilevel statistical modeling was used to identify clinical factors that affect the prevalence of breast cancer and to provide more reliable evidence for clinical diagnostics by using screening data. Results and Conclusion: Those women who had organ transplants, compared with those with none, were associated with breast cancer with an odds ratio (OR)=65.352 [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.488-503.165] and those with solid breast mass compared with none had OR=1.384 (95% CI: 1.022-1.873). Malignant tendency was strongly associated with increased risk of breast cancer, OR=207.999(95% CI: 151.950-284.721). The risk of breast cancer increased with age, $OR_1$=2.759 (95% CI: 1.837-4.144, 56-60 vs. 40-45), $OR_2$=2.047 (95% CI: 1.394-3.077, 51-55 vs. 40-45), $OR_3$=1.668 (95% CI: 1.145-2.431). Normal results of B ultrasonic examination show a lower risk among participants, OR= 0.136 (95% CI: 0.085-0.218). Those women with ductal papilloma compared with none were associated with breast cancer, OR=6.524 (95% CI: 1.871-22.746). Therefore, this study suggests that clinical doctors should pay attention to these high-risk factors.

Keywords

References

  1. Amaro J, Severo M, Vilela S, et al (2013). Patterns of breast cancer mortality trends in Europe. Breast, 22 ,244-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2013.02.007
  2. Becher H, Schmidt S, Chang-Claude J (2003). Reproductive factors and familial predisposition for breast cancer by age 50 years. A case-control-family study for assessing main effects and possible gene-environment interaction. Int J Epidemiol, 32, 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyg003
  3. Bordeleau L, Lipscombe L, Lubinski J, et al (2011). Diabetes and breast cancer among women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Cancer, 117, 1812-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25595
  4. Caruso A, Vigna C, Bigazzi V, et al (2011). Factors associated with an individuals' decision to withdraw from genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes mutations: are personality traits involved? Fam Cancer, 10, 581-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-011-9454-x
  5. Hamajima N, Hirose K, Tajima K, et al (2002). Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer--collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer, 87, 1234-45. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600596
  6. Haneuse S, Bartell S (2011). Designs for the combination of group- and individual-level data. Epidemiology, 22, 382-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182125cff
  7. Inumaru LE, Silveira EA, Naves MM (2011). [Risk and protective factors for breast cancer: a systematic review]. Cad Saude Publica, 27, 1259-70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2011000700002
  8. John EM, Schwartz GG, Dreon DM, et al (1999). Vitamin D and breast cancer risk: the NHANES I Epidemiologic follow-up study, 1971-1975 to 1992. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 8, 399-406.
  9. Lillberg K, Verkasalo PK, Kaprio J, et al (2003). Stressful life events and risk of breast cancer in 10,808 women: a cohort study. Am J Epidemiol, 157, 415-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwg002
  10. Liu L, Ding H, Wang LY, et al (2006). Analysis on the General Survey Result of Gynecological Diseases in Beijing Area from 2000 to 2005. Chin General Practice, 9, 1275-6 (Chinese).
  11. MacArthur AC, Le ND, Abanto ZU, et al (2007). Occupational female breast and reproductive cancer mortality in British Columbia, Canada, 1950-94. Occup Med (Lond), 57, 246-53. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqm002
  12. Mai V, Sullivan T, Chiarelli AM (2009). Breast cancer screening program in Canada: successes and challenges. Salud Publica Mex, 51, s228-35. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-36342009000800013
  13. McMahon JM, Pouget ER, Tortu S (2006). A guide for multilevel modeling of dyadic data with binary outcomes using SAS PROC NLMIXED. Comput Stat Data Anal, 50, 3663-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2005.08.008
  14. Millikan RC, Newman B, Tse CK, et al (2008). Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 109, 123-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9632-6
  15. Ravichandran K, Al-Zahrani AS (2009). Association of reproductive factors with the incidence of breast cancer in Gulf Cooperation Council countries. East Mediterr Health J, 15, 612-21.
  16. Reynolds P, Hurley S, Goldberg DE, et al (2004). Active smoking, household passive smoking, and breast cancer: evidence from the California Teachers Study. J Natl Cancer Inst, 96, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh002
  17. Ross RK, Paganini-Hill A, Wan PC, et al (2000). Effect of hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk: estrogen versus estrogen plus progestin. J Natl Cancer Inst, 92, 328-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.4.328
  18. Satake H, Nishio A, Ikeda M, et al (2011). Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 196, 202-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.4108
  19. Schonfeld SJ, Pfeiffer RM, Lacey JJ, et al (2011). Hormonerelated risk factors and postmenopausal breast cancer among nulliparous versus parous women: An aggregated study. Am J Epidemiol, 173, 509-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq404
  20. Taylor EF, Burley VJ, Greenwood DC, et al (2007). Meat consumption and risk of breast cancer in the UK Women's Cohort Study. Br J Cancer, 96, 1139-46. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603689
  21. Verloop J, Rookus MA, van der Kooy K, et al (2000). Physical activity and breast cancer risk in women aged 20-54 years. J Natl Cancer Inst, 92, 128-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.2.128
  22. Wang H, Guo XH, Jia ZW, et al (2010). Multilevel binomial logistic prediction model for malignantpulmonary nodules based on texture features of CT images. Eur J Radiol, 74, 124-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.01.024
  23. Warner E, Hill K, Causer P, et al (2011). Prospective study of breast cancer incidence in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation under surveillance with and without magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol, 29, 1664-9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.0835
  24. Yanhua C, Geater A, You J, et al (2012). Reproductive variables and risk of breast malignant and benign tumours in yunnan province, china. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 2179-84. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.5.2179
  25. Zakharova N, Duffy S, Mackay J, et al (2011). The introduction of a breast cancer screening programme in a region with a population at medium risk for developing breast cancer: Khanty-Mansiysky autonomous Okrug-Ugra (Russian Federation). Ecancermedicalscience, 5, 195.

Cited by

  1. A Clinical Database of Breast Cancer Patients Reveals Distinctive Clinico-pathological Characteristics: a Study From Central China vol.15, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.4.1621
  2. Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Using the Gail Model: a Turkish Study vol.16, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.1.303