Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology (한국식품과학회지)

Korean Society of Food Science and Technology (한국식품과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relative Sweetness and Sweetness Quality of Low Calorie Sweeteners in Milk and Coffee Model System

우유와 커피 모델 시스템에 적용된 저열량 감미 소재의 감미도와 감미질

  • Choi, Ji-Hye (Department of Nutritional Science & Food Management, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Pyo (Department of Food Science and Technology, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Chung, Seo-Jin (Department of Nutritional Science & Food Management, Ewha Womans University)
  • 최지혜 (이화여자대학교 건강과학대학 식품영양학과) ;
  • 김광표 (전북대학교 농업생명과학대학 식품공학과) ;
  • 정서진 (이화여자대학교 건강과학대학 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2013.09.05
  • Accepted : 2013.10.16
  • Published : 2013.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the relative sweetness of various sweeteners (tagatose, xylose, erythritol, sucralose, and enzyme treated stevia) in milk and instant coffee systems. Additionally, the effects of interactions with other ingredients on the sensory characteristics of milk and coffee were explored. In the case of a banana-flavored milk system, sucrose was added to a concentration of 5%, and the five types of sweetener were added to a concentration of equal sweetness to a 5% concentration of sucrose. For coffee systems, 5.9% sucrose level and sweeteners' concentration equivalent to this level was added. A generic descriptive analysis was performed using ten trained panelists. The results showed that the relative sweetness of all the sweeteners was identical to that identified in the aqueous system, except for stevia in the milk system and in the coffee system with added vegetable cream. For the black coffee system, the relative sweetness decreased for tagatose, erythritol and for stevia. Fat and vegetable cream significantly affected the sensory qualities of milk and coffee, respectively.

본 실험에서는 바나나향 우유와 커피시스템에 저칼로리 감미료를 첨가할 때 설탕 대비 상대감미도를 측정하고자 하였다. 아울러 바나나향 우유와 커피시스템에서 유지방과 식물성크림이 각 시스템의 관능적 특성에 끼치는 영향을 함께 보고자 하였다. 감미료의 종류는 설탕과 더불어 대체감미료로 tagatose, xylose, erythritol, sucralose, 그리고 효소처리 stevia를 분석하였다. 바나나향 우유의 경우 설탕 5% 첨가 수준을 기준으로 이전 연구에서 도출된 수용액상의 상대감미도를 적용하여 각 대체 감미료의 농도를 이에 맞게 첨가하였으며 커피시스템의 경우 설탕 5.9% 농도 수준으로 적용하여 실험을 진행하였다. 각 감미료 별 적용된 설탕 대비 상대감미도는 다음과 같다: Tagatose 0.83배, xylose 0.63배, erythritol 0.60배, sucralose 556배, 그리고 stevia 64배이다. 각 감미료가 바나나향 우유시스템과 커피시스템에서 발현되는 단맛강도와 기타 관능적인 특성을 이해하기 위해 묘사분석 전문 패널 10명을 활용하여 묘사분석을 실시하였다. 실험결과 바나나향 우유시스템의 경우 stevia를 제외하고는 일반수용액상의 상대감미도와 동일하였으며 stevia는 상대감미도가 감소하였다. 식물성크림 첨가 커피도 동일한 경향을 보였으나 블랙커피의 경우 stevia 외에 xylose와 tagatose의 상대감미도 또한 감소하였다. 바나나향 첨가 우유시스템의 경우 설탕 첨가 시료와 감미질이 유사한 시료는 tagatose와 sucralose 첨가 시료였던 반면 커피시스템의 경우 tagatose와 erythitol첨가 시료인 것으로 나타났다. 지방함량에 따라 바나나향 우유와 커피시스템의 관능적 특성은 매우 달라지는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구에서는 기존 수용액상 도출된 감미도가 적용되는 식품시스템에 따라 새롭게 조정되어야 하며 설탕을 대체할 최적 감미료는 적용되는 식품시스템에 따라 달라진다는 것을 보여 주었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Gwak MJ, Chung SJ, Kim YJ, Lim CS. Relative sweetness and sensory characteristics of bulk and intense sweeteners. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 21: 889-894 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-012-0115-0
  2. Roh HJ, Kim SY, Kim SS, Oh DK, Han KY, Noh BS. Physicochemical properties of a low calorie sweetener, tagatose. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 31: 24-29 (1999)
  3. Kim P. Current studies on biological tagatose production using L-arabinose isomerase: a review and future perspective. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 65: 243-249 (2004)
  4. Noh BS, Kim SY. Properties and application of erythritol. Food Sci. Indus. 33: 87-95 (2000)
  5. Yoon J, Kim H. Effect of xylitol and erythritol on the quality of yuza tea. Korean J. Soc. Cookery Sci. 19: 737-744 (2003)
  6. Frank GKW, Oberndorfer TA, Simmons AN, Paulus MP, Fudge JL, Yang TT, Kaye WH. Sucrose activates human taste pathways differently from artificial sweetener. Neuroimage 39: 1559-1569 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.061
  7. Gregersen S, Jeppesen PB, Holst JJ, Hermansen K. Antihyperglycemic effects of stevioside in type 2 diabetic subjects. Metabolis. 53: 73-76 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2003.07.013
  8. Barriocanal LA, Palacios M, Benitez G, Benitez S, Jimenez JT, Jimenez N, Rojas V. Apparent lack of pharmacological effect of steviol glycosides used as sweeteners in humans. A pilot study of repeated exposures in some normotensive and hypotensive individuals and in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetics. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 51: 37-41(2008)
  9. Schiffman SS, Booth BJ, Carr BT, Losee ML, Sattely-Miller EA, Graham BG. Investigation of synergism in binary mixtures of sweeteners. Brain Res. Bull. 38: 105-120 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-9230(95)00062-J
  10. Kwon DJ, Chang YS, Jo KS, Kang YH. Effect of sugars addition on physiochemical characteristics and sensory evaluation of kimchi. Korean J. Food Nutr. 12: 608-614 (1999)
  11. Portmann MO, Kilcast D. Psychophysical characterization of new sweeteners of commercial importance for the EC food industry. Food Chem. 56: 291-302 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(96)00026-X
  12. Portmann MO, Kilcast D. Descriptive profiles of synergistic mixtures of bulk and intense sweeteners. Food Qual. Prefer. 9: 221- 229 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(97)00071-2
  13. Samundsen JA. Has aspartame an aftertaste? J. Food Sci. 50: 1510-1512 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1985.tb10518.x
  14. Redlinger PA, Setser CS. Sensory quality of selected sweeteners: aqueous and lipid model systems. J. Food Sci. 52: 451-454 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb06637.x
  15. Kim H, Lee HS, Shin JY, Kim KO. Sensory properties and consumer acceptability of coffee drinks contained sucralose and acesulfame- K. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 39: 527-533 (2007)
  16. Chung SJ. Flavor release from ice cream during eating. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 16: 8-17 (2007)
  17. Drewnowski A, Shrager EE, Lipsky C, Stellar E, Greenwood MRC. Sugar and fat: Sensory and hedonic evaluation of liquid and solid foods. Physiol. Behav. 45: 177-183 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(89)90182-0
  18. Wiet SG, Ketelsen SM. Davis TR. Beyts PK. Fat concentration affects sweetness and sensory profiles of sucrose, sucralose, and aspartame. J. Food Sci. 58: 599-602 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb04333.x
  19. Yau NJN, McDaniel MR, Bodyfelt FW. Sensory evaluation of sweetened flavored carbonated milk beverages. J. Dairy Sci. 72: 367-377 (1989) https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79118-9
  20. de Melo LLMM, Bolini HMA, Efraim P. Sensory profile, acceptability, and their relationship for diabetic/reduced calorie chocolates. Food Qual. Prefer. 20: 138-143 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.09.001
  21. Schifferstein HNJ, Verlegh PWJ. The role of congruency and pleasantness in odor-induced taste enhancement. Acta Psychol. 94: 87-105 (1996)
  22. Birch GG. Towards an improved understanding of sweetener synergy. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 7: 403-407 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(96)10041-8
  23. Nahon DF, Roozen JP, de Graaf C. Sweetness flavour interactions in soft drinks. Food Chem. 56: 283-289 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(96)00025-8
  24. Baldwin RE, Korschgen BM. Intensification of fruit-flavors by aspartame. J. Food Sci. 44: 938-939 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1979.tb08546.x
  25. Barbosa PC, Moraes HM, Bolini HMA. Different sweeteners in beverages prepared with instant and roasted ground coffee: Ideal and equivalent sweetness. J. Sens. Stud. 25: 215-225 (2010)
  26. Bcking M, Steinhart H. Headspace GC and sensory analysis characterization of the influence of different milk additives on the flavor release of coffee beverages. J. Agr. Food Chem. 50: 1529-1534 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011117p

Cited by

  1. Optimal sensory evaluation protocol to model concentration–response curve of sweeteners vol.62, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.05.019
  2. Sweetness potency and sweetness synergism of sweeteners in milk and coffee systems vol.74, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.04.044
  3. Carbohydrate sweetener reduction in beverages through the use of high potency sweeteners: Trends and new perspectives from a sensory point of view vol.64, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.04.010
  4. Studies on the Physical Characteristics of Muffins with Tagatose and Sugar during Storage vol.25, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2015.2.25.1.176