References
- Removing Barriers to Responsible Scientific Research Involving Human Stem Cells Memorandum of March 9, 2009, Executive Order 13505, 74FR46 (Mar 11, 2009).
- Expanding Approved Stem Cell Lines in Ethically Responsible Ways, Executive Order 13435, 72FR120 (Jun 22, 2007).
- Kim OJ, Lee JS. Stem cell research ethics, policy and the law in UK: historical background and current status J Korean Bioethics Assoc 2005; 6(1):161-176.
- Kim HG. A study on the policy network of bioethics agenda setting in Korea. J Korean Bioethics Assoc 2005;4(1):55-74.
- Lee MH. U.S. stem cell policy change and implication: centered on ethical and political debate of Clinton, Bush, and Obama government. Life Res 2009;12:3-29.
- Han SG. Policy conflicts and coordination of legislation on bioethics issues in Korea [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2004.
- Kim IJ, Park HJ. Bioethics issues and science & technology regulation policy formation and change: the case of enactment process of ‘Bioethics & Biosafety Law'. Korean Policy Stud Rev 2011;20(1):111-149.
- Sabatier PA, Weible CM. The advocacy coalition framework: innovation and clarifications. In: Sabatier PA, editor. Theories of policy process. 2nd ed. Boulder: Westview Press; 2007. pp. 189-220.
- Lasswell HD. The policy orientation. In: Lerner D, Lasswell HD, editors. The policy sciences: recent developments in scope and method. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1951. pp. 3-15.
- Lasswell HD. The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sci 1970;1:3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145189
- Lasswell HD. A pre-view of policy sciences. New York: American Elsevier Publishing Co.; 1971.
- Sabatier PA. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci 1988;21:129-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
- Elliott C, Schlaepfer R. The advocacy coalition framework: application to the policy process for the development of forest certification in Sweden. J Eur Publ Pol 2001;8(4):642-661. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110064438
- Sabatier PA, Weible CM. The advocacy coalition framework. In: Sabatier PA, editor. Theories of policy process. 2nd ed. Boulder: Westview Press; 2007. pp. 117-166.
- Kim SY. The advocacy coalition framework in the analysis of policy process: examination of its theoretical and practical relevances. Korean Policy Stud Rev 2010;19(1):35-72.
- Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC. The advocacy coalition framework: an Assessment. Boulder: Westview Press; 1999.
- Meltsner AJ. Political feasibility and policy analysis. Public Admin Rev 1972;32(6):859-867. https://doi.org/10.2307/974646
- Park SO, Park CS. Analysis of the IPTV policy process: focusing on belief system change of advocacy coalition. Korean Public Admin Rev 2009; 43(3):197-228.
- Sabatier PA. Policy change over a decade or more. In: Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC, editors. Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press; 1993.
- Dawson G, Trust W. Mapping the landscape: national biomedical research outputs 1988-95. London: Wellcome Trust, Policy Research Dept.; 1998.
- Sohn HG. Analysis on Korean policy network for stem cell research: 1997-2005 [dissertation]. Seoul: Korea University; 2009.
- Sohn HG. Expectation dynamics of embryonic stem cell research: focusing on the establishment process of stem cell research center. J Sci Technol Stud 2008;8(1):55-95.
- The White House. Remarks of president Barack Obama: as prepared for delivery signing of stem cell executive order and scientific integrity presidential memorandum, Washington, DC, March 9, 2009 [Internet]. Washington (DC): The White House; 2009 [cited 2013 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-of-the-President-As-Prepared-for-Delivery-Signing-of-Stem-Cell-Executive-Order-and-Scientific-Integrity-Presidential-Memorandum/.
- Stolberg SG. Obama lifts Bush's strict limits on stem cell research. The New York Times. 2009 Oct 3.
- Stolberg SG. Obama is leaving some stem cell issues to congress. The New York Times. 2009 Sep 3.
- Cho SK, Cho EH, Yoon JR. Public perception toward life science issues. Soc Sci Res 2009;20(1):169-187.
- Lee KB. The meaning and characteristics of death from a traditional Korean perspective. Korean J Med Ethics 2010;13(2):91-106.
- Kim SJ. Confucianism and bioethics in the age of bio-engineering. Philos East-West Res 2003;30:309-336.
- Kim BH. Confucian perspectives on embryo research in bioethics age. Philos East-West Res 2007;49:427-458.
- Clarke M. Embryo research: British Commons vote for ban. Nature 1985;313(6004):618.
- Evans HJ, McLaren A. Unborn children (protection) bill. Nature 1985; 314(6007):127-128. https://doi.org/10.1038/314127a0
- Kim DG. Discussion of the bioethics law: centered on public debate and the formation process of social agenda. Sci Technol Policy Trend 2001;11(5):36-49.
- Kim DG. Response in the bioengineering industry. Seoul: Citizen Science; 2002.
- Mulkay MJ. The embryo research debate: science and the politics of reproduction. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
- Kim ES. Heterogeneous assemblages of bioethics and science: the "pre-embryo" debate in America. New Genet Soc 2008;27(4):323-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636770802485418
- Lee DI. Bioethics and safety act and the Catholic ethics. Catholic Theol Thought 2005;5:161-188.
- Kim JH, Kwon KH. Analysis of the decision-making process and introduction of Media representatives competition: applying a combination of model of advocacy coalition model (ACF) and the two-sided game theory (TLG). Korean Policy Stud Rev 2012;21(3):209-240.
- Choi EY, Ji HJ. Critical review of policy broker's role in advocacy coalition model. Korean Assoc Policy Stud 2008;(4):99-120.