Human Ecology Research

  • 제51권5호
  • /
  • Pages.563-571
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2982-5725(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2982-6608(eISSN)
대한가정학회 (The Korean Home Economics Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

체형과 사회문화적 특성에 따른 속옷평가기준의 비교 연구

Comparative Analysis of Underwear Evaluative Criteria according to Somatotypes and Socio-Cultural Characteristics

  • 박선미 (건국대학교 패션디자인전공)
  • Park, Sun Mi (Department of Fashion Design, Konkuk University)
  • 투고 : 2013.07.22
  • 심사 : 2013.08.27
  • 발행 : 2013.10.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study aimed to investigate the effects of somatotypes and body-related variables such as body exposure and body satisfaction on underwear evaluative criteria. Usable questionnaires were obtained from a total of 250 male and female students in their 20s. The data were mainly analyzed by t-test, ANOVA and analysis of variance using SPSS ver. 21.0. The results of this study are as follows: First, differences between underwear and outerwear evaluative criteria were found. For example, size, comfort and washing were important for the underwear but design, brand and fashionability were meaningful for outerwear. Price, color, material, and sewing were important for both outerwear and underwear. Second, the groups divided by somatotypes, a thin person group, a moderate person group and a fat person group, showed no difference in underwear evaluative criteria. Members of all the somatotype groups evaluated underwear similarly. Third, the groups divided by body image distortion showed different evaluative criteria for underwear. The negative discordance group emphasized the importance of the practicality factor, but the positive discordance group stressed the significance of the symbolism factor. Finally, the groups divided by body exposure and body satisfaction showed different evaluative criteria for underwear, too. The effects of socio-cultural variables on the underwear evaluative criteria proved to be significant.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cha, S. (2012). Comparison of innerwear color preference among the Korea, China and Hong Kong. Journal of Fashion Business, 16(5), 106-113. https://doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2012.16.5.106
  2. Cho, Y. J. (2005). Segmentation based on perception of somatotype and the relation between clothing evaluative criteria and segmentation. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 43(11), 185-196.
  3. Choi, I. R., & Bang, H. K. (2006). Study on the young women's preference for the apparel design and their somatotype. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 14(3), 381-386.
  4. Choi, J. M., Park, E. H., Shim, K. J., & Kim, I. S. (1998). The attitudes toward underwear, and the wearing & purchase practice of underwear items: Focused on middle school girls and their mothers in Chongju. Journal of Korean Living Science Association, 7(2), 103-112.
  5. Choi, K. E. (2006). The empirical research on underwear products strategies according to consumer's purchasing characteristics of sex. Korean J. of Human Ecology, 9(4), 41-53.
  6. Choi, M. S. (2008). A study on the preferred body shape and the perception between real and ideal body shapes of college students. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 32(3), 443-453. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2008.32.3.443
  7. Chung, O. I. (1993). A comparative study on the actual somatotype and the cognitive somatotype of female college students and high school students. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 31(1), 153-162.
  8. Gu, E. H., & Kweon, S. A. (2010). Relationships between clothing values, wearing behaviors and the attitudes toward underwear for female students. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 19(3), 565-575. https://doi.org/10.5934/KJHE.2010.19.3.565
  9. Hong, E. H., & Suh, M. A. (2008). A study on the sizing system for lower garments according to lower body types of adolescent boys. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 16(6), 1035-1049.
  10. Hong, K. H. (2006). The influence of the sociocultural attitudes towards appearance, BMI and body image on self-esteem. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 30(2), 348-357.
  11. Jun, D. & Park, S. (2009). Comparative analysis of children's clothing evaluative criteria according to groups divided by mother's somatotype & somatotype cognition. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 47(9), 91-99.
  12. Kim, D. H., & Kim, K. H. (2010). The study of satisfaction of somatotype for women in twenties on perceived somatotype, appreciated somatotype by other people, ideal somatotype: Based on the obesity index. Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 16(2), 82-97.
  13. Kim, H. S., & Lee, M. H. (2008). A study on body types of 40s, 50s, 60s of obese women. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 32(4), 618-629. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2008.32.4.618
  14. Kim, J. (2010). Underwear purchase behaviors and attitude by degree of interest in the appearance of males in their 20s-30s. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 34(10), 1647-1657. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2010.34.10.1647
  15. Kim, S. H., & Rhee, E. Y. (2001). Innerwear consumer segmentation according to the shopping orientation. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 39(11), 73-87.
  16. Kim, Y. (2011). The effects of women's attitudes, selection, and wearing experience on purchasing intention of underwears made of smart fibers. Journal of Fashion Business, 15(1), 115-128.
  17. Kim, Y. H., Kweon, S. A., & Kim, E. Y. (2001). Brand preference and evaluation criteria on purchase of underwear among the age of 20's female. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 25(7), 1203-1214.
  18. Kim, Y. W. (1998). The effects of underwear on clothing microclimate, physiological responses, and subjective sensations during summer. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 7(1), 139-146.
  19. Lee, E. J., Oh, H. S., & Suh, Y. H. (2007). The effect of shopping values and VM information on consumer purchase behavior: Basis on a under wear store. Journal of the Korean Society for Clothing Industry, 9(1), 65-71.
  20. Lee, J. S. (2007). Study of real somatotype and perceived body classified by body index of college women. Journal of Fashion Business, 11(5), 100-109.
  21. Lee, J. S., & Lee, J. R. (2008). A study on women's satisfaction with ready-to-wear by body type in twenties to thirties. Journal of Fashion Business, 12(4), 88-98.
  22. Lee, J. S., Seok, H. J., & Im, S. (2009). A comparison study on the body types of Korean women and Korean women residing in Japan: Focusing on women in their forties. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 33(4), 554-562. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2009.33.4.554
  23. Lee, J. Y., & Nam, Y. J. (2004). Comparison of somatotypes from various classification methods: Between 18 and 24 years old Korean women. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing Industry, 6(2), 221-228.
  24. Lee, K. L., & Park, S. H. (2004). Apparel fit by body perception and body satisfaction. Journal of The Korean Society of Costume, 54(1), 69-81.
  25. Lee, S. H., & Cho, K. H. (2010). A study on the aesthetic characteristics and sociocultural meanings of outerization. Journal of Fashion Business, 14(4), 22-40.
  26. Lee, S. R. (1997). The vogue about outwearization of underwear in a tendency to the century-end. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 35, 325-341.
  27. Na, M. H., Kim, M. S., & Jung, B. H. (2002). The wearing effect of sport underwear: Focusing on the change of fat in each body. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 10(6), 735-747.
  28. Oh, H. N. (2004). A study on the relation between clothing evaluative criteria and personality types of female university students. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 42(8), 123-132.
  29. Paik, H. Y., Nam, Y. J., Park, J. K., & Kim, J. Y. (2000). The comparison of somatotype by the body consciousness and physical measurements. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 38(3), 59-70.
  30. Park, J. K., Nam, Y. J., & Choi, K. M. (2004). A comparison of satisfaction for actual body and perceived body between Korean and Japanese female college students. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 28(6), 758-766.
  31. Rhee, J. H. (2007). A study on effects of somatotypes and stress on body cathexis and preferences of clothing Image. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 15(6), 1084-1099.
  32. Shim, J. H. (2006). A comparative study of the middle-aged women's real somatotype and cognitive somatotype. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 30(11), 1507-1518.
  33. Sung, M. J., & Kim, H. E. (2001). Classification of the somatotype by obesity indexes and body cognition of female college students. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing Industry, 3(3), 227-234.
  34. Wee, E. H., & Kwon, Y. M. (2009). A study on school uniform reforming behavior in relation to body Image: In the case of high school girls. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 47(10), 73-85.

피인용 문헌

  1. Body cathexis and Clothing Behavior of Middle-aged Women according to the Depression Level vol.18, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2016.18.2.207
  2. Effects of Fit-Related Factors and Clothing Evaluation Criteria on Clothing Satisfaction vol.25, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2014.25.3.373