2011-2012절기 B형 인플루엔자 감염의 임상 양상

The Clinical Characteristics of Influenza B Infection during the 2011-2012 Influenza Season

  • 김민선 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 성현우 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 배이영 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 한승범 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 정대철 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 강진한 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실)
  • Kim, Min Sun (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Sung, Hyun Woo (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Bae, E Young (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Han, Seung Beom (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Jeong, Dae Chul (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kang, Jin Han (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 투고 : 2012.12.04
  • 심사 : 2013.01.26
  • 발행 : 2013.08.25

초록

목 적 : 국내 B형 인플루엔자의 임상 양상 및 A형 인플루엔자와 비교를 위해 후향적 연구를 시행하였다. 방 법 : 2011-2012 인플루엔자절기에 multiplex PCR로 인플루엔자가 진단된 소아청소년 입원 환자들의 의무 기록 분석으로 B형 인플루엔자의 임상 양상과 함께 같은 기간 A형 인플루엔자와의 차이점을 조사하였다. 결 과 : 연구 기간 동안 진단 된 145명 인플루엔자 환자 중, A형 인플루엔자 66명, B형 인플루엔자 78명이 있었고, 1명은 A, B형 인플루엔자가 동시에 진단되었다. 이들은 기침(88.2%), 콧물(77.1%), 가래(60.4%) 등 호흡기 증상을 호소하며, 하기도 감염(49.3%) 및 상기도 감염(31.9%)으로 진단된 경우가 많았다. B형과 A형 인플루엔자 환자의 주요 증상 및 검사실 소견은 차이가 없었고, A형에 비해 B형 인플루엔자 환자의 입원 전 발열기간이 길었다(3.0일 vs. 2.5일, P=0.043). 결 론 : 임상 양상만으로 B형과 A형 인플루엔자 감별은 제한성이 있고, B형 인플루엔자 환자의 입원 전 발열 기간 3일을 고려한다면 진단 후 치료보다 감염 전 예방이 중요하다.

Purpose: This retrospective study was performed to identify the clinical characteristics of influenza B infection and compare to influenza A infection. Methods: Medical records of patients diagnosed with influenza using a multiplex PCR test, admitted to Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, during the 2011-2012 influenza season were analyzed. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of influenza B patients were investigated and compared with those of influenza A patients. Results: A total of 145 influenza patients were enrolled during this study period. Among these, 66 and 78 patients were diagnosed with influenza A and B, respectively, and 1 patient was diagnosed with co-existing influenza A and B. Cough (88.2%), rhinorrhea (77.1%) and sputum (60.4%) were the most common symptoms among these influenza patients, and most were diagnosed with upper respiratory infection (31.9%) or lower respiratory infection (49.3%). In comparison to influenza A patients, influenza B patients were older ($4.7{\pm}4.1$ years vs. $3.3{\pm}2.5$ years, P=0.016), and the number of fever days before hospitalization were longer (3.0 days vs. 2.5 days, P=0.043). While sore throat (10.3% vs. 1.5%, P=0.039) and vomiting (20.5% vs. 6.1%, P=0.012) were more common in influenza B patients than in influenza A patients, other clinical and laboratory characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: No significant differences in clinical and laboratory perspectives were manifested in influenza A and B infections. Preventive measures should be emphasized over treatment in influenza B due to prolonged fever duration before admission.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Neuzil KM, Mellen BG, Wright PF, Mitchel EF, Jr., Griffin MR. The effect of influenza on hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and courses of antibiotics in children. N Engl J Med 2000;342:225-31. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200001273420401
  2. Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Bridges CB, Cox NJ, et al. Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States. JAMA 2004;292:1333-40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.11.1333
  3. Kang TG, Kim MJ, Kim BG, An HS, Yun HJ, Choi EJ, et al. Comparisons of clinical features among influenza A (H1N1) and seasonal influenza A and B during 2009 to 2010 at a single institution. Pediatr Allergy Respir Dis 2011;21:269-76. https://doi.org/10.7581/pard.2011.21.4.269
  4. Kim SH, Park CH, Huh K, Shim GH, Kim HB, YouSJ, et al. Comparison of clinical manifestation and laboratory findings between H1N1 and influenza B infection. Pediatr Allergy Respir Dis 2012;22:64-70. https://doi.org/10.7581/pard.2012.22.1.64
  5. Ambrose CS, Levin MJ. The rationale for quadrivalent influenza vaccines. Hum vaccin Immunother 2012;8:81-8. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.8.1.17623
  6. Jian JW, Lai CT, Kuo CY, Kuo SH, Hsu LC, Chen PJ, et al. Genetic analysis and evaluation of the reassortment of influenza B viruses isolated in Taiwan during the 2004- 2005 and 2006-2007 epidemics. Virus Res 2008;131:243-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2007.09.014
  7. Rota PA, Wallis TR, Harmon MW, Rota JS, Kendal AP, Nerome K. Cocirculation of two distinct evolutionary lineages of influenza type B virus since 1983. Virology 1990;175:59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(90)90186-U
  8. Roy T, Agrawal AS, Mukherjee A, Mishra AC, Chandha MS, Kaur H, et al. Surveillance and molecular characterization of human influenza B viruses during 2006-2010 revealed co-circulation of Yamagata-like and Victorialike strains in eastern India. Infect Genet Evol 2011;11:1595-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2011.05.022
  9. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korean influenza surveillance report, 2011-2012. Public Health Weekly Report 2012;5:873-81. Available at http://www. cdc.go.kr/CDC/info/CdcKrInfo0301.jsp?menuIds=HO ME001-MNU0004-MNU0036-MNU0037 [accessed on 1 Dec 2012].
  10. Daley AJ, Nallusamy R, Isaacs D. Comparison of influenza A and influenza B virus infection in hospitalized children. J Paediatr Child Health 2000;36:332-5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1754.2000.00533.x
  11. Hite LK, Glezen WP, Demmler GJ, Munoz FM. Medically attended pediatric influenza during the resurgence of the Victoria lineage of influenza B virus. Int J Infect Dis 2007;11:40-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2005.10.008
  12. Peltola V, Ziegler T, Ruuskanen O. Influenza A and B virus infections in children. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:299-305. https://doi.org/10.1086/345909
  13. Belshe RB, Coelingh K, Ambrose CS, Woo JC, Wu X. Efficacy of live attenuated influenza vaccine in children against influenza B viruses by lineage and antigenic similarity. Vaccine 2010;28:2149-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.068
  14. Frey S, Vesikari T, Szymczakiewicz-Multanowska A, Lattanzi M, Izu A, Groth N, et al. Clinical efficacy of cell culture-derived and egg-derived inactivated subunit influenza vaccines in healthy adults. Clin Infect Dis 2010;51:997-1004. https://doi.org/10.1086/656578
  15. Jackson LA, Gaglani MJ, Keyserling HL, Balser J, Bouveret N, Fries L, et al. Safety, efficacy, and immunogeni city of an inactivated influenza vaccine in healthy adults: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial over two influenza seasons. BMC Infect Dis 2010;10:71. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-71
  16. Janjua NZ, Skowronski DM, De Serres G, Dickinson J, Crowcroft NS, Taloy M, et al. Estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness for 2007-2008 from Canada's sentinel surveillance system: cross-protection against major and minor variants. J Infect Dis 2012;205:1858-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jis283
  17. Monto AS, Ohmit SE, Petrie JG, Johnson E, Truscon R, Teich E, et al. Comparative efficacy of inactivated and live attenuated influenza vaccines. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1260-7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0808652
  18. Vesikari T, Fleming DM, Aristegui JF, Vertruyen A, Ashkenazi S, Rappaport R, et al. Safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of cold-adapted influenza vaccine-trivalent against community-acquired, culture-confirmed influenza in young children attending day care. Pediatrics 2006;118:2298-312. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0725
  19. Lim J, Eom CS, Kim KH, Kim S, Cho B. Coverage of influenza vaccination among elderly in South Korea: A population based cross sectional analysis of the season 2004-2005. J Korean Geriatr Soc 2009;13:215-21. https://doi.org/10.4235/jkgs.2009.13.4.215
  20. Kee SY, Cheong HJ, Chun BC, Kim WJ. Influenza vaccination coverage rate and factors associated with vaccination in people with chronic disease. Infect Chemother 2011;43:406-11 https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2011.43.5.406