DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Is the Store-and-Forward Delivery Still the Best in Ad Hoc Networks?

  • Received : 2013.07.09
  • Accepted : 2013.09.04
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

In multihop routed ad hoc networks, the conventional store-and-forward delivery has been used. However, we may ask a question: "Is the store-and-forward delivery still the best?" This paper presents a pipeline-through MAC (PT-MAC) protocol for ad hoc networks, in which nodes have two 3-channel interfaces in order to use limited radio resources efficiently and improve network performance. The proposed protocol reduces end-to-end delay significantly in multihop routed transmission by exploiting a novel pipeline-through technique rather than using the conventional store-and-forward. This results in improved network performance without increasing control overhead. Our extensive performance study shows that the proposed PT-MAC shows 20-40 percent shorter end-to-end delay and 25-55 percent better goodput compared to the IEEE 802.11 DCF with two 3-channel interfaces.

Keywords

References

  1. H. Zhu, G. Cao, "On Improving the Performance of IEEE 802.11 with Relay-Enabled PCF," ACM/Kluwer Mobile Networking and Applications (MONET), Vol. 9, No. 4, pp.423-434, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MONE.0000031608.10301.18
  2. IEEE, "Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Spec," IEEE 802.11 Standard, 1999.
  3. Y. Seok, J. Park, Y. Choi, "Multirate Aware Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks," Proeedings of IEEE Conference on Vehicular Technology, pp. 22-25, 2003.
  4. IEEE WG, "IEEE Std 802.11a-1999, Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control(MAC) and Physical Layer(PHY) specification, Amendment 1: High-speed physical Layer in the 5 GHz band," 1999.
  5. IEEE WG, "IEEE Std 802.11b-1999, Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control(MAC) and Physical Layer(PHY) specification, Higher-speed Physical Layer Extension in the 2.4 GHz band," 1999.
  6. B. Awerbuch, D. Holmer, H. Rubens, "High Throughput Route Selection in Multi-Rate Ad Hoc Wireless Networks," Proceedings of Working Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems (WONS), 2004.
  7. D.S.J. DeCouto, D. Aguayo, J. Bicket, R. Morris, "A High-Throughput Path Metric for Multihop Wireless Routing," Proceedings of ACM Mobicom, pp.134-146, 2003.
  8. A. Kamerman, L. Monteban, "WLAN-II: A High-Performance Wireless LAN for the Unlicensed Band," Bell Labs Technical Journal, Vol. 2, No. 8, pp.118-133, 1997.
  9. G. Holland, N. Vaidya, P. Bahl, "A Rate-Adaptive MAC Protocol for Multihop Wireless Networks," Proceedings of ACM Mobicom, pp.236-251, 2001.
  10. J. Park, H. Shin, S. Moh, "Pipeline-Through Medium Access Control for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks," Proceedings of Int. Conf. on Smart Media and Applications (SMA 2012), pp.A6.1-A6.4, 2012.
  11. B. Sadeghi, V. Kanodia, A. Sabharwal, E. Knightly, "Opportunistic Media Access for Multirate Ad Hoc Networks," Proceedings of ACM Mobicom, pp.24-35, 2002.
  12. J. Gomez, A.T. Campbell, M. Naghshineh, C. Bisdikian, "Conserving Transmission Power in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks," Proceedings of IEEE Int. Conf. on Network Protocols (ICNP), 2001.
  13. H. Zhu, G. Cao, "rDCF: A Relay-Enabled Medium Access Control Protocol for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks," IEEE Trans. on Mobile Computing, Vol. 5, No. 9, pp.1201-1214, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2006.137
  14. The Network Simulator ns-2, http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns, 2011.