한국안광학회지 (Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society)

한국안광학회 (The Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

각막난시와 자세 변화에 의한 토릭소프트렌즈의 축 회전

Axial Rotation of Toric Soft Lens by Corneal Astigmatism and Change of Posture

  • 김소라 (서울과학기술대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 김현선 (서울과학기술대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 정가원 (서울과학기술대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 박형민 (서울과학기술대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 박상희 (가야대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 박미정 (서울과학기술대학교 안경광학과)
  • Kim, So Ra (Dept. of Optometry, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Sun (Dept. of Optometry, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Jung, Ga Won (Dept. of Optometry, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Park, Hyung Min (Dept. of Optometry, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Park, Sang Hee (Dept. of Ophthalmic Optics, Kaya University) ;
  • Park, Mijung (Dept. of Optometry, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2013.11.02
  • 심사 : 2013.12.14
  • 발행 : 2013.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 렌즈 착용자의 자세변화 시 토릭소프트렌즈의 축 회전을 알아보고 각막난시와의 상관관계에 대해 알아보았다. 방법: 직난시를 가진 20대 42안을 대상으로 정자세와 누운 자세에서의 토릭소프트렌즈의 회전 정도와 회전 방향, 회전 속도를 측정하여 각막 난시량에 따라 차이가 있는지를 비교 분석하였다. 결과: 정자세와 누운 자세에서 각각의 축 회전 정도는 처방도수에 따라 유의한 차이가 없었으나, 자세의 변화에 따른 회전 각도는 유의한 차이가 있었다. 정자세에서의 회전은 20안은 코쪽, 22안은 귀쪽으로 회전하였다. 누운 자세에서는 거의 모든 대상안에서 누운 방향으로 회전 되었으며 -0.75 D를 착용한 초기에는 회전 속도가 빨랐던 것에 비해 -1.25 D를 착용할 때는 상대적으로 회전속도가 일정하였다. 누운 자세에서의 회전 각도는 각막 난시량에 따라 유의한 차이를 보였고, 회전 속도 또한 시간의 흐름에 의해서는 유의한 차이를 보인 반면 각막 난시량에 따라서는 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 결론: 토릭소프트렌즈의 축 회전 정도는 자세 변화에 따라 다르게 나타나며, 각막 난시량이 큰 경우 그 정도가 더 크므로 렌즈디자인 개발 시 이에 대해 고려해야 할 것으로 보인다.

Purpose: The present study was conducted to investigate the axial rotations of toric soft lens during the change of lens wearer's posture, and the relationship between its rotation and corneal astigmatism. Methods: The amount, direction, and speed of toric soft contact lens rotation were measured for 42 eyes (aged 20s) with the rule astigmatism in the straight and lying postures, and it compared between their changes according to corneal astigmatism. Results: There was no significant difference in the axial rotation of lens for the astigmatism prescription between the straight and lying postures. However, the rotation angle was significantly different according to the posture of lens wearer. Rotating directions in straight posture were nasal direction for 20 eyes and temporal direction for 22 eyes. In lying posture, lenses of most wearers were rotated to a direction of lying posture, and the initial rotating speed was very fast in initial wearing for -0.75 D toric lenses, but consistency for -1.25 D toric lenses. The rotation angle in lying posture showed significantly different according to the amount of corneal astigmatism, the lens speed was also significantly different according to the wearing time but not the amount of corneal astigmatism. Conclusions: The axial rotation of toric soft lens was different by the lens wearer's posture and its amount was the greater with the higher degree of corneal astigmatism. Thus, these factors should be considered for the development of toric lens design.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Tranoudis IG, Helland M, Efron N, Orihuela GC et al. International Contact Lens Prescribing in 2012: Our 2012 survey of more than 20,000 contact lens fits was undertaken in 36 markets. Contact lens spectrum. 2013;27(1): 31-38.
  2. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG, Helland M, Efron N, Grupcheva CN et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2010: We report on a prospective analysis of more than 24,000 contact lens fits from around the world during 2010. Contact lens spectrum. 2011;25(1):30-30.
  3. Edrington TB. A literature review: The Impact of rotational stabilization methods on toric soft contact lens performance. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2011;34(3):104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2011.02.001
  4. Holden BA. The principles and practice of correcting astigmatism with soft contact lenses. Aust J Optom. 1975;58(8):279-299.
  5. Tan J, Papas E, Carnt N, Jalbert I, Skotnitsky C, Shiobra M et al. Performance standards for toric soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(5):422-428. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e318059063b
  6. Karla Z, The Ocular Examination: Measurements and Findings, 1st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders company, 1997:52- 53.
  7. Brookman KE, Elliott DB. Refractive Management of Ametropia, 1st ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. 1996; 718-719.
  8. Sulley A, Young G, Lorenz KO, Hunt C. Clinical evaluation of fitting toric soft contact lenses to current nonusers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013;(33):94-103.
  9. Young G, McIlraith R, Hunt C. Clinical Evaluation of factors affecting soft toric lens orientation. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(11):1259-1266. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181bc63b4
  10. Hogben CA. A practical and simple equivalent for student's T test of statistical significance. J Lab Clin Med. 1964;64:815-819.
  11. Huck SW, Mclean RA. Using a repeated measures ANOVA to analyze the data from a pretest-posttest design: a potentially confusing task. Psychological Bulletin. 1975;82(4): 511-518 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076767
  12. Driscoll WC. Robustness of the ANOVA and Tukey-kramer statistical tests. Computer & Industrial Engineering. 1996; 31(1-2):265-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-8352(96)00127-1
  13. Harris MG, Decker MR, Funnell JW. Rotation of spherical nonprism and prismballast hydrogel contact lenses on toric corneas. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1977;54(3):149- 152. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197703000-00005
  14. Hanks AJ, Weisbarth RE. Troubleshooting soft toric contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1983;10:305-317.
  15. Yu DS, Moon BY, Son JS. Usefulness of rotation for toric soft lenses using objective refraction. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2011;16(3):265-272.
  16. Kim SY, Lee DY, Lee SH, Kim KK, Song S, Cho HG, Analysis of axial mis-alignment after wearing of toric soft contact lenses. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2010;15(3):213-217.
  17. Tan J, Papas E, Carnt N, Jalbert I, Skotnitsky C, Shiobra M et al. Performance standards for toric soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(5):422-428. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e318059063b
  18. Kim JH, Kang SA. A study on the relationship between the off-axis cylinder and corrected vision of astigmatism. J Korea Oph Opt Soc. 2007;12(3):83-87.
  19. Quinn TG. Soft toric rotation: How much is too much? Contact lens Spectrum. 2009:24(3):48-49.
  20. Szczotka L. New empirical suggestions for prescribing soft toric contact lenses. Optom Manage. 2002;37:99-103.

피인용 문헌

  1. Correlation between Anterior and Posterior Corneal Astigmatism in Total Corneal Astigmatism vol.19, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2014.19.3.377
  2. Change in Axial Rotation of Toric Soft Contact Lens according to Tear Volume vol.20, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2015.20.4.445
  3. A Survey about Wearing Soft Contact Lenses for Astigmatism Correction of The Local College Students, Gyeongsangnam-Do, Korea vol.3, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15205/kschs.2015.3.3.378
  4. Comparison of Corneal Aberration and Contrast Sensitivity for WTR-Astigmatism according to the Prescription Method of Soft Contact Lenses vol.26, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2021.26.3.181